Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.75s

  • Seguros La Provincial, S.A. v. Fremont Indemnity Co.

    138 Cal. App. 3d 923 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1983

    Section 11580.1, Subdivision (g) 2 Does Not Violate the Public Policy of the State of California Fremont relies on Brown v. … Exchange v. Cocking, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 389; Cooper v. Bray, supra, 21 Cal.3d at 848 ; Newland v. Board of Governors, supra, 19 Cal.3d at p. 711 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Provident Land Corp. v. Provident Irrigation District

    22 Cal. App. 2d 105 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1937

    No showing is made of what is an inadequate consideration, and no showing of any specific acts constituting refusals on the part of the board of directors as herein alleged. As stated in the case of Kelsey v. … In the case of Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Campa

    89 Cal. App. 3d 113 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 2, 1979

    (Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ]; In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 848 .) … (See In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at pp. 851-852.) Her rights are those of an owner, not a creditor. (Phillipson v. Board of Administration, supra, 3 Cal.3d at p. 44 .)

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • City of Santa Clara v. Ivancovich

    47 Cal. App. 2d 502 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1941

    (Manhattan Beach, v. Cortelyou, supra; Diamond Match Co. v. Savercool, 218 Cal. 665 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 783 ] ; Brown v. Bachelder, 214 Cal. 753 [ 7 Pac. (2d) 1027 ]; People v. Bio Nido Co., Inc., 29 Cal. … (Brown v. Bachelder, supra.) Respondents or some of them were parties to a deed inter se, dated March 12, 1937, in which a boundary is given as Alviso Street.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bank of America, N.A. CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 2023

    Filed 6/9/23 Brown v. Bank of America, N.A. … (Brown v. Superior Court (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 1208, 1210‒1211 (Brown); see id.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wells Fargo Bank v. Goldzband

    53 Cal. App. 4th 596 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1997

    The court of common pleas affirmed the board’s decision and the chief of the division of oil and gas appealed the decision with respect to Brown. (Id. at p. 1023.) … (Brown v. State Personnel Board (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d 70, 79 [ 110 P.2d 497 ].)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Larkin v. WCAB

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 2014

    ADJ7191871) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: petition for writ of review. … (Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [48 Cal.Rptr. 609, 409 P.2d 689].)” (Rehman, supra, 178 Cal.App.4th at p. 587.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Inglewood CA2/1

    California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2023

    Filed 5/31/23 Brown v. … The case on which Brown primarily relies in arguing to the contrary, Whitehall v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lehane v. City & County of San Francisco

    30 Cal. App. 3d 1051 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1972

    Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … Street, 367 U.S. 740 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 1141 , 81 S.Ct. 1784 ], and Lathrop v. Donohue, 367 U.S. 820 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 1191 , 81 S.Ct. 1826 ], In Machinists v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re McClendon

    6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 278 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 2003

    The Governor may review decisions of the Board, and affirm, modify, or reverse the Board’s decision on the “basis of the same factors which the parole authority is required to consider.” (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. … Brown, J. did not participate therein.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Holliday v. City of Modesto

    229 Cal. App. 3d 528 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1991

    (Public Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 797, 806-807 [ 213 Cal.Rptr. 491 ].) … In Ford Motor Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Safeway Stores, Inc. v. County of Alameda

    51 Cal. App. 3d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1975

    Com. v. Payne, supra.) Absent contrary indication in a statute, it is presumably intended to operate prospectively and not retroactively (see, e.g., DiGenova v. … Brown (H. G), J., and Scott, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied October 29, 1975, and appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 11, 1975.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Berkeley People's Alliance v. City of Berkeley

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 2026

    BROWN, P. J. WE CONCUR: STREETER, J. CLAY, J. Berkeley City Alliance et al. v. City of Berkeley et al. … Brown Act (the Brown Act; Gov.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California State Employees' Ass'n v. California Public Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration

    113 Cal. App. 4th 137 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 2003

    (People v. Rizo (2000) 22 Cal.4th 681, 685 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 375 , 996 P.2d 27 ].) … (Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 804 [ 268 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 789 P.2d 934 ].)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Host International, Inc. v. County of San Mateo

    35 Cal. App. 3d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1973

    (Roberts v. Graves, 269 Cal.App.2d 410, 418 [ 75 Cal.Rptr. 130 ].) … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ogle v. Eckel

    49 Cal. App. 2d 599 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1942

    App. 446 [ 123 Pac. 350 ]; Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 649 [ 67 Pac. 1082 ] ; Welsh v. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 [ 33 Pac. 66 ]. … (Davis v. County of Los Angeles, 12 Cal. (2d) 412 [ 84 Pac. (2d) 1034 ]; Board of Law Library Trustees of Orange County v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 571, 573 [ 34 Pac. 244 ].)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Aden v. Younger

    57 Cal. App. 3d 662 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1976

    Brown, 9 Cal.3d 199, 202-203 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 137 , 507 P.2d 1345 ]; Jolicoeur v. Mihaly, 5 Cal.3d 565, 570 , fns. 1 & 2 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 697 , 488 P.2d 1 ]; San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. … Johnson, 3 Cal.3d 937, 944 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 309 , 479 P.2d 669 ]; State Board of Equalization v. Watson, 68 Cal.2d 307 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 437 P.2d 761 ]; County of Sacramento v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Service Employees International Union v. Superior Court

    112 Cal. App. 3d 712 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1980

    In general, the Board has exclusive jurisdiction over conduct either protected or prohibited under the NLRA. (Kaplan’s Fruit & Produce Co. v. … (Kaplan’s Fruit & Produce Co., supra, 26 Cal.3d 60, 68-69 ; Auto Workers v. Wisconsin Board (1956) 351 U.S. 266 [ 100 L.Ed. 1162 , 76 S.Ct. 794 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.

    145 Cal. App. 3d 395 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1983

    Romanski and Hession, Creedon, Hamlin, Kelly, Hanson & Brown for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION FEINBERG, J. … Public officials such as judges, policemen, and school teachers fall into such a category." ( Board of Trustees v. Stubblefield (1971) 16 Cal. App.3d 820, 824 [ 94 Cal. Rptr. 318 ]; see also, Titus v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Sechrist v. Municipal Court

    64 Cal. App. 3d 737 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1976

    (City of *746 Knoxville v. Brown (1953) 195 Tenn. 501 [ 260 S.W.2d 264, 269 ].) … (Thomas v. Zoning Board of Adjustment (Tex.Civ.App. 1951) 241 S.W.2d 955, 958-959 .)

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.