Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.45s

  • People v. Brown CA2/2

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2022

    NA109769) v. BERNARD BROWN, JR., Defendant and Appellant. THE COURT: Bernard Brown, Jr. appeals the judgment following resentencing on remittitur. … (People v. Brown (Aug. 24, 2020, B295442) [nonpub. opn.].)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Briney v. Santa Ana High School District

    131 Cal. App. 357 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1933

    Respondent relies upon section 1962 of the Code of Civil Procedure, section 1635 of the Civil Code, McCormick Lumber Co. v. Highland School Dist., 26 Cal. App. 641 [ 147 Pac. 1183, 1184 ], Brown v. … (Goldsmith v. Board, of Education, 63 Cal. App. 141 [ 218 Pac. 296 ]; Anderson v. Scranton, 111 Cal. App. 322 [ 295 Pac. 544 ] ; Morris v. Board of Education, 119 Cal. App. 750 [ 7 Pac. (2d) 364 ]; Saxton v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Jevne

    56 Cal. App. 3d 860 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1976

    Sandy, Robert Thomas, Walter Brown and Ed Wells (hereafter generally county building inspectors). … In Heyer v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Berkeley Police Ass'n v. City of Berkeley

    167 Cal. App. 4th 385 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 2008

    (See Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 233-235 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 ] (Brown).) … In any event, the issue of whether section 832.7 supersedes local laws creating citizen police review boards was addressed by the California Supreme Court in Dibb v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Broney v. California Commision on Teacher Credentialing

    184 Cal. App. 4th 462 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 2010

    (Finnerty v. Board of Registered Nursing (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 219, 227 [ 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 364 ].) We review questions of law de novo. (Bostean v. … (Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners (1976) 16 Cal.3d 762, 767 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 462 , 548 P.2d 1134 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Beecham v. Burns

    34 Cal. App. 754 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1917

    In McKinnell v. … In People v. Brown, 3 Cal.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Healdsburg

    57 Cal. App. 3d 444 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1976

    Board of Supervisors, supra at p. 782; Ball v. City Council, supra at p. 141 ; Humbert v. Castro Valley County Fire Protection Dist. (1963) 214 Cal.App.2d 1, 13 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 158 ]; Cozzolino v. … Board of Supervisors, supra at p. 778; Bagley v. Washington Township Hospital Dist. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 499, 503-505 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 401 , 421 P.2d 409 ]; Rosenfield v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc., 36 Cal. 3d 171 (1984)Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Los Angeles County v. Commission on Professional Competence

    61 Cal. App. 3d 664 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1976

    Section 13405 is in pari materia with section 13403 (Board of Trustees v. … Dist. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rios v. Bennett

    88 Cal. App. 2d 919 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1948

    The rule as stated in Sanker v. … (Watkins v. Nutting, 17 Cal.2d 490, 495 [ 110 P.2d 384 ]; Brannock, v. Bromley, 30 Cal.App.2d 516, 524 [ 86 P.2d 1062 ].) In Foti v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Griswold v. County of San Diego

    32 Cal. App. 3d 56 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1973

    (Legislature v. Reinecke, 6 Cal.3d 595, 598 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 481 , 492 P.2d 385 ]; Silver v. Brown, 63 Cal.2d 270, 280 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. Respondents’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 28, 1973. 1 People ex rel. Snowball v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Carbonie

    48 Cal. App. 3d 679 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1975

    (See People v. Vann, 12 Cal.3d 220, 225 [ 115 Cal. … [a] This column indicates the amount of time one must serve even if the judge or parole board finds mitigating circumstances.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • H.K.H. Co. v. Superior Court

    95 Cal. App. 3d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1979

    (Garrett v. Superior Court, 11 Cal.3d 245, 248 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 520 P.2d 968 ]; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.3d 259, 266 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 231 , 551 P.2d 847 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Staniforth, J., concurred.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Pilatti

    96 Cal. App. 3d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1979

    In California a spouse’s claim of ownership does not constitute assignment, attachment or alienation (Phillipson v. Board of Administration, 3 Cal.3d 32 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ]). … Board of Administration, supra, 3 Cal.3d 32 ; In re Marriage of Sommers, supra, 53 Cal.App.3d 509 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gwinn v. Goldman

    57 Cal. App. 2d 393 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1943

    Proc.; Board of Public Service Commrs, v. Spear, 65 Cal.App. 214 [ 223 P. 423 ] ; Alden v. Mayfield, 33 Cal.App. 724 [ 166 P. 382 ]; Vatuone v. Cannobio, 4 Cal.App. 422 [ 88 P. 374 ] ; 12 Cal.Jur. 629, see. 32.) … The case of Field v. Walton, 94 Cal.App. 596 [ 271 P. 500 ], and San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Saville

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 2024

    (Towns v. … Brown, Bradford D. Brown, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Freeman Mathis & Gary, Albert K. Alikin, Christian E. Foy Nagy, and Christopher J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hood v. Melrose

    24 Cal. App. 355 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1914

    (Tucker v. Justice’s Court, 120 Cal. 512 , [ 52 Pac. 808 ] ; Grant v. Justice’s Court, 1 Cal. App. 383 , [ 82 Pac. 263 ]; Bennett v. Wallace, 43 *361 Cal. 25; Wittman v. … Neither can the case of Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473 , [ 120 Am. St.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • County of Alameda v. Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn., Inc.

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2024

    Brown (1995) 9 Cal. 4th 688, 695, 711 (Rossi).) … Brown (2017) 3 Cal.5th 808, 828 (Briggs).) There are two tests for measuring compliance with the single-subject rule. (One Technologies, LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Hornbrook Community Services Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2019

    While a finding of prejudice is required before nullifying the Board’s action (San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. … “[T]he Brown Act is a remedial statute that must be construed liberally so as to accomplish its purpose.” (Epstein v. Hollywood Entertainment Dist. II Business Improvement Dist. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 862, 869.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tidewater Oil Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    67 Cal. App. 3d 950 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1977

    v. … (Estate of Baldwin, 21 Cal.2d 586, 591 [ 134 P.2d 259 ]; Brown v. Sweet, 95 Cal.App. 117, 124 [ 272 P. 614 ].)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Department of Personnel Administration v. Superior Court

    5 Cal. App. 4th 155 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1992

    (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 177 .) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 178 , italics added.)

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human ResourcesCited 44 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.