Case law

Hale v. Farrell

115 Cal. App. 3d 164 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1981

Garland (1946) 27 Cal.2d 840 , 851 *167 [ 168 P.2d 5 ]; Childs v. Eltinge (1973) 29 Cal.App.3d 843, 848 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 864 ]; Shuffer v. Board of Trustees (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 208, 217 [ 136 Cal.Rptr. 527 ].) 2. … (See Canales v. City of Alviso (1970) 3 Cal.3d 118, 130 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 474 P.2d 417 ]; Stanson v. Brown (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 812, 814-815 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 862 ].)

People v. Broun

109 Cal. App. 3d 284 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1980

Defendant relies principally on People v. … Brown [íz'c] has been in the county jail several-times.

Barnthouse v. California Steel Buildings Co.

215 Cal. App. 2d 72 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1963

BROWN (R.M.), J. … Plaintiff relies on Stewart v. Cox, 55 Cal.2d 857 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 521 , 362 P.2d 345 ]; Dow v. Holly Manufacturing Co., 49 Cal.2d 720 [ 321 P.2d 736 ]; and Tomchik v.

Griffin v. County of Colusa

44 Cal. App. 2d 915 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1941

(See, also, Atkinson v. Clark, 132 Cal. 476 [ 64 Pac. 769 ].) *923 Appellant refers us to Davie v. Board of Regents, 66 Cal. … That part of the judgment in favor of defendants County of Colusa, the Board of Supervisors, and the Director of the Hospital is affirmed, and that portion of the judgment in favor of Barbara Stevens and Mildred Brown is

Bell v. Camm

10 Cal. App. 388 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1909

(Cook v. Pendergast, 61 Cal. 78 .) *392 The judgment in this action was rendered on the fourth day of May, 1908, and was entered on the thirteenth day of May, 1908. … Brown with, a view to settling the present action now pending out of court,” etc., and . . .

Register Division of Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. County of Orange

158 Cal. App. 3d 893 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1984

While the Brown Act has been interpreted to allow closed sessions for the purpose of confidential attorney-client consultation (Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. … San Gabriel Tribune v.

Mystery Mesa Mission Christian Church, Inc. v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 1

63 Cal. App. 3d 37 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1976

In Jillson v. … A. v. Tax Appeals Bd. No. 2 (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 830 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 469 ], the petitioner was the county, an entity obviously not within the provisions of sertion 5136 et seq. In Midstate Theatres, Inc. v.

Baisley v. Henry

55 Cal. App. 760 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1921

The ordinance declares that the chief of police shall be appointed by the board of trustees upon the nomination of the city manager. … (Brown v. West, 75 N. H. 463 [ 76 Atl. 169 ]; Dobbins v. City of Arcadia, 44 Cal.

Dominguez v. Superior Court

139 Cal. App. 3d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 1983

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. Petitioner, Richard M. Dominguez, is the Superintendent of Banks for the State of California. … Real party argues the ratification by the newly appointed board two weeks later was fully effective. Even a forgery may be ratified, real party tells us (Rakestraw v.

In Re Marriage of Judd

68 Cal. App. 3d 515 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1977

We note further that in Brown, the Supreme Court also stated “[o]ur suggestion in Phillipson v. … However, subsequent to the trial court’s decision, the law on this subject changed with the ruling in In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838 . 2 In Brown, the court overruled its decision in French v.

Alameda County Employees' Ass'n v. County of Alameda

30 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1973

This determination may be made either prior to or at the time the salary ordinance is adopted by the Board. (Walker v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 55 Cal.2d 626, 635; Sanders v. … (City and County of San Francisco v. Boyd, supra, 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 ; Walker v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 55 Cal.2d 626, 639 ; Anderson v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 229 Cal.App.2d 796, 798 ; Carrier v.

San Gabriel Tribune v. Superior Court

143 Cal. App. 3d 762 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1983

This was precisely the type of governmental action that the Brown Act and the Public Disclosure Act were designed to keep open to public scrutiny. National Parks and Conservation Ass’n. v. … The Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq. declares that “[t]he public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business.

City of San Diego v. Van Winkle

69 Cal. App. 2d 237 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1945

(Citing, Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 211 Cal. 304 [ 295 P. 14 ]; Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ]; City of Stockton v. … Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 339, 346 , 25 L.Ed. 676 ; Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 606 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 ; Cummings v. Chicago, 188 U.S. 410, 428 , 23 S.Ct. 472 , 47 L.Ed. 525 ; Lane County v.

Sievers v. Root

10 Cal. App. 337 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1909

(Schaufle v. Doyle, 86 Cal. 107 , [ 24 Pac. 834 ]; Geurkink v. *341 Petaluma, 112 Cal. 310 , [ 44 Pac. 570 ]; Duncan v. Ramish, 142 Cal. 694 , [ 76 Pac. 661 ]; Brown v. … In Brown v. Seattle, 5 Wash. 35 , [ 31 Pac. 313 , 32 Pac. 214 ], the injury threatened was by a cut in the grade of the street adjoining the plaintiff’s lot.

Greer v. Hitchcock

271 Cal. App. 2d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1969

(Paterson v. Board of Trustees, 157 Cal.App.2d 811 [ 321 P.2d 825 ]; see Lemoge Electric v. County of San Mateo, 46 Cal.2d 659 [ 297 P.2d 638 ].) … Brown (H. C.), J., and David, J. pro tem., * concurred. * Retired judge of the superior court sitting under assignment by, the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

Brown v. America's Servicing CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 2013

Filed 10/10/13 Brown v. … On October 10, 2013, this court issued an order severing the instant appeal from plaintiff’s appeal as to the remaining defendants in Brown v. Foigelman, G048422.

People v. Daniels

222 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1963

(Fountain v. State Board of Education, 157 Cal.App.2d 463, 469 [ 320 P.2d 899 ].) There is nothing in the 1961 amendment to Penal Code section 1203.4 which states that that statute has retroactive effect. … It is stated in DiGenova v.

Downey v. Santa Fe Transportation Co.

134 Cal. App. 2d 720 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1955

In Gates v. … In this connection there was evidence that Brown, the foot-board switchman, proceeded about 8 feet in front of the engine as it crossed the highway.

Reyes v. Macy's, Inc.

202 Cal. App. 4th 1119 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 2011

Lexis 88781, p. *14; Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., supra, 197 Cal.App.4th 489 .) … The court in Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., supra, 197 Cal.App.4th 489 pointed out that Quevedo v.

People v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2022

Filed 6/22/22 P. v. … No. 21PT-00562) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County) v. LATION BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.