Case law

Carson Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board

37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 768 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 2006

(See Carson Mobilehome Park Owners’ Assn. v. … (See Carroll v.

Kane v. County of San Diego

2 Cal. App. 3d 550 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1969

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. Plaintiff sued San Diego County in negligence and conversion for destroying his interest in 28 greyhounds at the county’s Vista Animal Shelter October 29, 1963. … Code, § 3336; Crofoot Lbr., Inc. v. Ford, 191 Cal.App.2d 238, 248 [12 *553 Cal.Rptr. 639]; Murphy v. Wilson, 153 Cal.App.2d 132, 136 [ 314 P.2d 507 ]).

Craig Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

51 Cal. App. 3d 909 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1975

This grant of immunity from taxation was first considered by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. The State of Maryland (1827) 25 U.S. … The court also reiterated the “original package” doctrine enunciated in Brown v.

Pomatto v. Sarten

214 Cal. App. 2d 747 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1963

Brown’s original attorneys referred the complaint to Attorney Catalano with authorization of Brown, but Brown did not know what the attorneys did with the complaint. … Board of Retirement, 183 Cal.App.2d 289, 302-303 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 608 ], the court said: “While there is authority for appellate courts to make findings of fact under proper circumstances (Code Civ.

City of Palo Alto v. Public Employment Relations Board

5 Cal. App. 5th 1235 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 2016

(Board of Education v. … (Monarch Cablevision, Inc. v. City Council (1966) 239 Cal.App.2d 206, 211; Board of Supervisors v. California Highway Commission (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 952, 961-962.)

Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors

168 Cal. App. 2d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1959

168 Cal.App.2d 559 (1959) JACKSON & PERKINS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. STANISLAUS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 9515. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. … Brown and Brown, Brown & Bacon for Appellant. Frederick W. Reyland, Jr., County Counsel, David G. Dunford, Assistant County Counsel, Clayton M. Ham, Deputy County Counsel, J. F.

Noel v. Lewis

35 Cal. App. 658 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1917

(Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 649 , [ 67 Pac. 1082 ]; Stevens v. Truman, 127 Cal. 155 , [ 59 Pac. 397 ].) … (Nicholl v. Koster, 157 Cal. 416 , [ 108 Pac. 302 ].)

In Re Circosta

219 Cal. App. 2d 777 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1963

(Hotaling v. … [Citations.] ” (O’Brien v. Appling (1955) 133 Cal.App.2d 40, 42 [ 283 P.2d 289 ].) As the court stated in Brown v.

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District v. Feinberg

37 Cal. App. 3d 920 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1974

It has long been recognized that a particular act or omission may constitute all thtefe of the grounds of dismissal here charged (Board of Education v. … Dist. v. De Caristo, 33 Cal.App.2d 666, 674 [ 92 P.2d 668 ], decided under a predecessor statute). Judgment reversed. Brown (H. C.), J., and Devine, J., * concurred.

Baychester Shopping Center, Inc. v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

165 Cal. App. 4th 1000 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 2008

Co. v. … (Gilbert v.

County of Madera v. Superior Court

39 Cal. App. 3d 665 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1974

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 256 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

California Alliance for Utility Safety & Education v. City of San Diego

56 Cal. App. 4th 1024 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1997

(Alameda County Land Use Assn. v. City of Hayward, supra, 38 Cal.App.4th at p. 1723 .) In Alameda County Land Use Assn. v. … (See § 54956.9; Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 813, 824-825 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 342 ].)

Hernandez v. Town of Apple Valley

7 Cal. App. 5th 194 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2017

v. … (Ketchum v.

Jones Lumber Co. v. Del Norte County

251 Cal. App. 2d 645 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1967

Oil Co. v. Byram, supra; Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. … Salsman, J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred. Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 28, 1967.

Rodenberger v. Frederickson

111 Cal. App. 2d 139 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1952

(Devens v. Goldberg, 33 Cal.2d 173, 178 [ 199 P.2d 943 ].) As is said in Spore v. … (Couch v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 80 Cal.App.2d 857, 867 [ 183 P.2d 91 ] ; Brown v. Boehm, 78 Cal.App.2d 595 [ 178 P.2d 49 ].) As is said in Zibbell v. Southern Pac.

MacLeod v. Long

110 Cal. App. 334 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1930

Plaintiff argues that the activities of the board of public utilities are proprietary and not governmental in their nature and hence that the powers of the board should not be strictly construed. … In support of this contention he cites Brown v. Board of Education, 103 Cal. 531, 534, 535 [ 37 Pac. 503 ], Morgan v. Board of Education, 136 Cal. 245, 246 [ 68 Pac. 703 ], and Doland v.

Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services v. Willeta W.

25 Cal. App. 4th 1205 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1994

W.’s progress in board and care; and providing referrals as needed to the foster mother. … (Cynthia D. v. Superior Court, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 256.)

Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1991

(See Free v. Bland (1962) 369 U.S. 663, 666, 668 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 180, 183-184 , 82 S.Ct. 1089 ]; Fisher v. City of Berkeley (1984) 37 Cal.3d 644, 655 [ 209 Cal.Rptr. 682 , 693 P.2d 261 ].) … Accordingly, *1544 Board’s action was dismissed as moot. (City of Santa Monica v. Pierce (9th Cir. 1984) Dock. No. 83-6369 [nonpub. opn.].)

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

75 Cal. App. 3d 192 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1977

The board agreed, granted reconsideration, and awarded Hart the sum of $2,383.38 as a penalty assessment against Fidelity. The board in its decision relied on Adams v. Workers’ Comp. … (Kerley v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 223, 227 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 192 , 481 P.2d 200 ].)

Fett v. Medical Board of California

245 Cal. App. 4th 211 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 2016

Filed 2/3/16 Fett v. … (Evans v.