Case law

People v. Brown CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2020

Filed 8/25/20 P. v. … Brown’s case was final some two decades ago. Accordingly, he is ineligible for relief under SB 1391. (Cf. People v.

Stillman v. Board of Retirement of the Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

198 Cal. App. 4th 1355 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2011

Judgment was entered in favor of respondent board of retirement (the Board), the governing body of FCERA. … Stillman requested a hearing before the Board.

Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Assn. v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 2021

(Mackey v. Board of Trustees of California State University, supra, 31 Cal.App.5th at p. 657.) … (See D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1 (D’Amico); see Ahn v. Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc. (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 133, 136 [referring to “D’Amico rule”].)

Nemecek & Cole v. Horn

208 Cal. App. 4th 641 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 2012

The arbitrator is of counsel at Brown, White & Newhouse (BWN), a private law firm that has represented clients in the area of legal malpractice defense. Relying on Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. … (Staples v.

Bryce v. Superior Court

205 Cal. App. 3d 671 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1988

XII, § 6), the Agricultural Relations Board (Cal. Const., art. XIV, § 1), the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (Cal. Const., art. XX, § 22), and the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Cal. Const., art. … (People v. Tenorio (1970) 3 Cal.3d 89, 94 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 249 , 473 P.2d 993 ].) In Gray v.

Merced County v. Kong-Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 2021

(Paxton v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 553, 559; Poncio v. … at p. 433; see Levingston v. Retirement Board (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 996, 1000 [trial court independently reviews the administrative record and may reweigh the evidence].)

In Re Circosta

219 Cal. App. 2d 777 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1963

(Hotaling v. … [Citations.] ” (O’Brien v. Appling (1955) 133 Cal.App.2d 40, 42 [ 283 P.2d 289 ].) As the court stated in Brown v.

Alpha Standard Investment Co. v. County of Los Angeles

118 Cal. App. 3d 185 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1981

[Citing United States v. Brown (1965) 381 U.S. 437 ( 14 L.Ed.2d 484 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 ).] … Indeed, just three Terms later, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 , 388 n. 30, (1968), which, like Brown, was also written by Mr.

Service Employees International Union, Local 390/400 v. Board of Supervisors

180 Cal. App. 3d 1179 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1986

The board has thus interpreted “one year of continuous service” for vacation purposes to mean 2,080 hours, which calculates out one year as comprising 40 hours per week for 52 weeks. … Under the authority expressly given to the board of supervisors by section 8.440, subdivision (g) of the charter to “administer, interpret and regulate” the board has selected a fair, evenhanded vacation formula totally consistent

People v. Brown CA2/2

California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 2020

Filed 8/24/20 P. v. … NA109769) v. BERNARD BROWN, JR., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James D. Otto, Judge.

Morell v. Board of Ret. of the Orange County Employees' Ret. etc.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2024

No. 22STCP02345) v. BOARD OF RETIREMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Appellant. … Instead, citing Ransome- Crummey Co. v.

County of San Diego v. Stiles

268 Cal. App. 2d 261 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1968

Their function is limited to a review of the decision of the administrative board in the premises (Bank of America v. Mundo, supra, 37 Cal.2d 1, 5 ). … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

Mealing v. Diane Harkey for Board of Equalization 2014

California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 2016

Mealing alleged Diane was running for a seat on the California State Board of Equalization and formed the Campaign to manage her run for office. … (Greb v. Diamond Internat. Corp. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 243, 247, fn. 3; Finton Construction, Inc. v. Bidna & Keyes, APLC (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 200, 204-205; see Cal.

Outudoor Resorte/Palm Springs Owners' Ass'n v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

224 Cal. App. 3d 696 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1990

(People v. Hill (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 525, 533, fn. 4 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 99 ].) … In Gamm v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 129 Cal.App.3d 34, 37-38 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 23 ], the statute at issue explicitly stated the punitive consequence of the agency’s failure to act.

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 854 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 2002

(Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (1970) 2 Cal.3d 85, 94-95 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 113 , 465 P.2d 1 ].) On appeal, we apply the same standard of review as the Board. … (Provigo Corp. v.

Jacobs v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 1222

49 Cal. App. 3d 959 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1975

The following day he sent a similar letter to the local union’s executive board. … Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage etc.

City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

36 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1973

The most recent case in this area is Garietz v. … (Healy v. Industrial Acc. Com., 41 Cal.2d 118, 122 [ 258 P.2d 1 ].) The order is annulled and the matter is remanded to respondent board for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Governing Board of Ripon Unified School District v. Commission on Professional Competence

177 Cal. App. 4th 1379 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2009

Johnson v. Board of Education (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 593, 600-601 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 885 ].) . . . … (Board of Education v. Round Valley Teachers Assn. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 269, 283 [ 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 115 , 914 P.2d 193 ].)

City and County of San Francisco v. Pace

60 Cal. App. 3d 906 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1976

(See City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.2d 236, 247-252 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 347 P.2d 294 ]; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 23 Cal. 2d 303, 313-315 ; Board of Permit Appeals v. … (Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ]; In re Ricky H., 2 Cal.3d 513, 522 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 76 , 468 P.2d 204 ].)

Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors

168 Cal. App. 2d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1959

168 Cal.App.2d 559 (1959) JACKSON & PERKINS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. STANISLAUS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 9515. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. … Brown and Brown, Brown & Bacon for Appellant. Frederick W. Reyland, Jr., County Counsel, David G. Dunford, Assistant County Counsel, Clayton M. Ham, Deputy County Counsel, J. F.