Case law

Griffis v. County of Mono

163 Cal. App. 3d 414 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1985

Brown Act (§ 54950 et seq.) may subject the decisionmakers to criminal liability, the decision is not void. (Rowen v. Santa Clara Unified School Dist. (1981) 121 Cal.App.3d 231, 236 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 292 ]; Greer v. … Aylward v. State Board etc.

Long v. Pinto

126 Cal. App. 3d 946 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1981

Pinto’s letter was sent to prompt board action and was thus part of an official proceeding (King v. Borges (1972) 28 Cal.App.3d 27, 34 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 414 ]). … Proceedings by a private hospital as to the fitness of a staff doctor are reviewable under such a writ (Applebaum v. Board of Directors (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 648, 656 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 831 ]).

Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n v. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

134 Cal. App. 73 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1933

In Jones v. … This court has also spoken to the same effect in Zahn v.

Daugherty v. Board of Trustees of South Bay Union High School District

111 Cal. App. 2d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1952

Proc., § 1085; Sheehan v. Board of Police Comrs., 188 Cal. 525, 535 [ 206 P. 70 ]; Boggs v. Jordan, 204 Cal. 207, 216 [ 267 P. 969 ].) … For cases where the procedure adopted in this litigation was followed see Caminetti v. Board of Trustees, 1 Cal.2d 354 [ 34 P.2d 1021 ], and Comstock v.

Conservatorship of Bryant

45 Cal. App. 4th 117 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1996

(See Charles S. v. Board of Education (1971) 20 Cal. App.3d 83, 95 [ 97 Cal. Rptr. 422 ]; see also People v. Turner (1993) 15 Cal. App.4th 1690, 1698 [ 19 Cal. Rptr.2d 736 ]; People v. Goodloe, supra, 37 Cal. … App.4th at p. 491 ; Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal. App.2d 591, 607 [ 45 Cal. Rptr. 512 ].)

Markus v. Justice's Court

117 Cal. App. 2d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1953

Brown and to kill one ewe and two lambs. Appellant pleaded guilty in the justice’s court and was fined $50 and ordered to pay to Brown the value of the sheep killed. … (People v. Commons, supra; Pipoly v. Benson, supra; Natural Milk Etc. Assn. v. City & County of San Francisco, 20 Cal.2d 101, 109 [ 124 P.2d 25 ]; Ex parte Daniels, 183 Cal. 636, 643 [ 192 P. 442 , 21 A.L.R. 1172 ].)

Brown v. Dept. of Justice CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2024

Filed 6/21/24 Brown v. … (McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 1198, 1217- 1218; see Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection Authority, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 1183.) Brown contends that Ochoa v.

Assn. of Irritated Residents v. Kern County Board etc.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2017

(See California Native Plant Society v. … (City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341, 356.)

City of Santa Cruz v. Santa Cruz City School Board of Education

210 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1989

(Dyna-Med, Inc. v. … (People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1008 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 656 , 741 P.2d 154 ].) Section 53094 is part of a legislative reaction to Hall v.

L.A. v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 2022

Filed 7/20/22 L.A. v. … DISCUSSION L.A.’s petition for a civil harassment restraining order ([L.A.] v. Brown (Super. Ct.

Henneberque v. City of Culver City

147 Cal. App. 3d 250 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1983

(San Leandro Police Officers Assn. v. City of San Leandro (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 553, 558 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 856 ].) … City of Healdsburg (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 444 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 216 ], the court held that the officer’s dis *255 charge without a hearing violated the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov.

Chadock v. Cohn

96 Cal. App. 3d 205 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1979

Discussion We find the applicable law to be set forth in Brown v. … The existence of such need was discussed in Brown v.

Williams v. City of Oakland

30 Cal. App. 3d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1973

(Italics added; Chambreau v. Coughlan, 263 Cal.App.2d 712, 718 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 783 ]; see also Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 217 Cal.App.2d 153, 157 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 761 ]; Wilkins v. … (Brown v. Schroeder, 88 Cal.App. 192, 208 [ 263 P. 325 ].) In reason,, we must apply the same criteria to the Board’s decision on Williams’ application.

Brown v. County of Santa Clara CA6

California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 2025

Filed 4/11/25 Brown v. … Brown also cites Sparrow v.

County of San Diego v. Milotz

119 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 871 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1953

What is said in Galli v. Brown, supra, must be taken in consideration with the facts there involved. … The statement made in Galli v. Brown, supra, cites as supporting authorities County of Santa Barbara v. Janssens, supra, and Merriam v. Board of Supervisors, supra.

Weeks v. Merritt Building & Construction Co.

39 Cal. App. 3d 520 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1974

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … (Barry v. Contractors State License Board (1948) 85 Cal.App.2d 600, 605 [ 193 P.2d 979 ].)

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2022

No. 93F1202) v. OPINION ON TRANSFER CURTIS EDWARD BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. … (People v. Brown (Nov. 16, 2020, 1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 1 C089260) [nonpub. opn.].)

People v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2020

Filed 11/3/20 P. v. … (Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; Arizona v. Fulminante (1991) 499 U.S. 279, 296.)

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

122 Cal. App. 3d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1981

Thus, in Parente v. … In Torres v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev.

Licea v. Brown Sugar CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2023

Filed 1/27/23 Licea v. … (See, e.g., Groves v.