Case law

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Hargreaves

36 Cal. App. 2d 338 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1939

Brown the loan was approved by the loan committee and the board of directors of the First National Bank of Beverly Hills. Although the other directors were not aware of the fact, Mr. … Brown. His conviction was affirmed by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals (Hargreaves v.

Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Ex Rel. State Reclamation Board v. Reed

217 Cal. App. 2d 611 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1963

Water Co. *613 v. Edmands, 188 Cal. 344 [ 205 P. 445 ]; City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber etc. Co., 172 Cal. 332 [ 156 P. 468 , Ann.Cas. 1917E 259]; San Joaquin etc. Irr. Co. v. … (See also Collier v. Merced Irr. Dist., 213 Cal. 554 [ 2 P.2d 790 ].) This rule is applicable to costs after a successful appeal by the condemner. (City of Stockton v.

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS, ETC. v. Schwarzenegger

174 Cal. App. 4th 424 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 2009

Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] ( Pacific Legal Foundation ) perceived a conflict between the mandate imposed upon the State Personnel Board (SPB) to enforce a civil service system "based … Fund v.

Plenger v. Alza Corp.

11 Cal. App. 4th 349 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1992

Grimes, a board certified gynecologist. Dr. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 44 Cal.3d 1049, 1062 .)

People v. Martin

140 Cal. App. 2d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1956

An examination of the car disclosed marijuana debris on both the front and back floor boards, and on the rear floor board there was a burnt marijuana cigarette about %" in length, and brown “roll your own” cigarette papers … (People v. Martin, 46 Cal.2d 106 [ 293 P.2d 52 ]; People v. Blodgett, 46 Cal.2d 114 [ 293 P.2d 57 ]; People v. Rios, 46 Cal.2d 297 [ 294 P.2d 39 ].)

American Federation of Teachers v. San Lorenzo Unified School District

276 Cal. App. 2d 132 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1969

However, the court in Beverly Hills Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied October 16, 1969. 1 Now Education Code section 13443 (see Parker v. Board of Trustees, 242 Cal.App.2d 614 at p. 617 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 653 ]).

Markus v. Justice's Court

117 Cal. App. 2d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1953

Brown and to kill one ewe and two lambs. Appellant pleaded guilty in the justice’s court and was fined $50 and ordered to pay to Brown the value of the sheep killed. … (People v. Commons, supra; Pipoly v. Benson, supra; Natural Milk Etc. Assn. v. City & County of San Francisco, 20 Cal.2d 101, 109 [ 124 P.2d 25 ]; Ex parte Daniels, 183 Cal. 636, 643 [ 192 P. 442 , 21 A.L.R. 1172 ].)

Certificated Employees Council v. Monterey Peninsula Unified School District

42 Cal. App. 3d 328 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1974

The basic rule is that sections of the Education Code bearing on the same subject must be read and construed together where possible (Brown v. Bozeman, 138 Cal.App. 133 [ 32 P.2d 168 ]; see County of Placer v. … City of Monrovia, 24 Cal.App.3d 289 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 78 ], interpreted substantially identical language in the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, §§ 3500-3501), which amended and expanded the George Brown Act (Gov.

Marino v. City of Los Angeles

34 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1973

(Cadilla v. Board of Medical Examiners, 26 Cal.App.3d 961, 966 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 455 ]; Nightingale v. State Personnel Board, 7 Cal.3d 507, 515 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 498 P.2d 1006 ]; Harris v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. … (Brown v. Gordon, 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 667 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].)

Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital Center

234 Cal. App. 2d 377 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1965

radiologists selected by the board. … “In executing said contract of August 27, 1959, with defendants Boice, Jones and Brown, it was the judgment of the Board of Directors of the Hospital Center that the contract was in the best interests of the public and of

Williams v. City of Oakland

30 Cal. App. 3d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1973

(Italics added; Chambreau v. Coughlan, 263 Cal.App.2d 712, 718 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 783 ]; see also Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 217 Cal.App.2d 153, 157 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 761 ]; Wilkins v. … (Brown v. Schroeder, 88 Cal.App. 192, 208 [ 263 P. 325 ].) In reason,, we must apply the same criteria to the Board’s decision on Williams’ application.

JMS Air Conditioning etc. v. Santa Monica Community College Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 2019

The District is an educational institution, and the primary purpose of its governing board is thus to educate—not to referee construction disputes. (See Doe v. … Hearing Officer JMS argues the substitution hearing did not constitute a fair trial because Brown, rather than the District governing board, conducted the hearing.

Elcome v. Chin

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 631 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 2003

(Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 826 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 ] (Brown).) … [Citation.]’ ” (Hanson v.

State Personnel Bd. v. DPA

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 278 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 2003

VII, § 3; Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 184, 197-198, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Gee v. California State Personnel Bd. (1970) 5 Cal.App.3d 713, 717 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 762 ; Department of Parks & Recreation v. … v.

Porter v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System

222 Cal. App. 4th 335 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2013

(Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Retirement (1997) 16 Cal.4th 483, 490.) 2. … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 725; see also Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

Henneberque v. City of Culver City

147 Cal. App. 3d 250 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1983

(San Leandro Police Officers Assn. v. City of San Leandro (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 553, 558 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 856 ].) … City of Healdsburg (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 444 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 216 ], the court held that the officer’s dis *255 charge without a hearing violated the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov.

In Re Marriage of Emmett

109 Cal. App. 3d 753 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 1980

To the contrary, the Supreme Court in Brown specifically stated in its footnote at page 848 of 15 Cal.3d as follows: “Our suggestion in Phillipson v. … This conclusion is apparent from the above quoted language of Brown.

International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Oakland

174 Cal. App. 3d 687 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1985

However, all proceedings and actions were stayed pending decisions in San Francisco Fire Fighters, Local 798 v. Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco and The People ex rel. … San Francisco Fire Fighters v. Board of Supervisors (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 538 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 145 ], hearing denied in Supreme Court November 8, 1979.

Rossi v. Rossi

134 Cal. App. 2d 639 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1955

At a meeting of the board of directors held on April 26, 1954, three of the directors—Louis Ferrari, Elios P. Anderlini, and Joseph A. Brown all tendered their resignations which were forthwith accepted. … This conclusion is supported by Sonnicksen v. Sonnicksen, 45 Cal.App.2d 46, 52 [ 113 P.2d 495 ], No other question requires discussion. Order affirmed. Dooling, J., and Kaufman, J., concurred.

Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n v. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

134 Cal. App. 73 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1933

In Jones v. … This court has also spoken to the same effect in Zahn v.