Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.71s
Governing Board of the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District v. Felt
55 Cal. App. 3d 156 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1976
Board of Education, 39 Cal.App.3d 355 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 84 ].) … (Brown v.
Cited 19 timesPublished190 Cal. App. 4th 918 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 2010
(People v. … Appellant’s reliance on People v. Brown (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1489 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 513 ] is unavailing.
Cited 17 timesPublishedWest Hollywood Community Health & Fitness Center v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
232 Cal. App. 4th 12 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 2014
BS135715) v. CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Luis A. Lavin, Judge. … Such reversal was required because the appellate court determined that the worker was an independent contractor, not an employee, as had been determined by the Board. (Id. at p. 711.) Similarly, in Metric Man, Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedStevenson v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System
186 Cal. App. 4th 498 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 2010
(Fukuda v. … Neeley v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 2024
(People v. … (Hoze, supra, 61 Cal.App.5th at p. 313; see Brown v. Plata (2011) 563 U.S. 493, 499–500.) “To further reduce the prison population, a federal court ordered the state to implement what became the Elderly Parole Program.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 2021
Filed 4/13/21 P. v. … (See People v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFlying Dutchman Park, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco
113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 690 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2001
Com. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 720, 725-726 [ 192 P.2d 916 ]; see also Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177, 179 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ].) … At oral argument, Flying Dutchman also relied upon Brown v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedSouthwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
72 Cal. App. 2d 689 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1946
Again, in Johnson v. … Donner, 48 Cal. 369 ; Janes v. Throckmorton, 57 Cal. 368 ; Younger v. Moore, 155 Cal. 767 [ 103 P. 221 ], and Sledge v. Stoltz, 41 Cal.App. 209 [ 182 P. 340 ].
Cited 1 timesPublished209 Cal. App. 4th 530 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 2012
Sess. 2009-2010) Jan. 12, 2009); People v. Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at pp. 317-318; Payton v. Superior Court, supra, 202 Cal.App.4th at p. 1191 .) … (People v. Lara (2012) 54 Cal.4th 896, 899 [ 144 Cal.Rptr.3d 169 , 281 P.3d 72 ]; People v. Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at p. 318, fn. 5; People v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedUnited Farm Workers of America v. Superior Court
72 Cal. App. 3d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1977
BROWN (G. A.), P. J., Concurring and Dissenting. I concur generally in the reasoning and conclusion of the principal opinion. … Lastly, I cannot agree with the implication of the majority opinion that the Agricultural Labor Relations Board is an “expert agency.”
Cited 21 timesPublishedWilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Ass'n
176 Cal. App. 2d 320 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1959
(Wilson v. Board of Re tirement, 167 Cal.App.2d 229 [ 334 P.2d 230 ].) The remittitur provides that respondent recover its costs on appeal. … (Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157 [ 225 P. 783 ].) . . .” (Uhl v. Badaracco, 199 Cal 270 at 284 [ 248 P. 917 ] ; Skelly Estate Co. v.
Cited 19 timesPublished99 Cents Only Stores v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 569 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 2000
Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 217 Cal. 244 ; Longval v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 51 Cal.App.4th at p. 798 .) … In Lee v. Workers' Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMazda Motor of America, Inc. v. California New Motor Vehicle Board
2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 866 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2003
The Board was intended as an industry response to problems with the practices of its members (Toyota of Visalia, Inc. v. … Citing Ray Fladeboe Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2021
Filed 3/18/21 P. v. … Thus, Brown forfeited this contention on appeal. (People v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMorgan, Beauzay, Hammer, Ezgar, Bledsoe & Rucka v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
59 Cal. App. 3d 353 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1976
We agree that the award, measured by the board’s own guidelines, is unreasonable, and that the board abused its discretion in permitting its workers’ compensation judge to employ standards not in conformance with the board … (See Bentley v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1946) 75 Cal.App.2d 547, 549-550 [ 171 P.2d 532 ]; Robert G. Beloud, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 729, 737 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 750 ].)
Cited 3 timesPublishedMumford v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
258 Cal. App. 2d 49 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1968
BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … (Garcia v. Martin, 192 Cal.App.2d 786, 790-791 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 59 ] ; State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court, 5 Cal.App.2d 374, 377 [ 42 P.2d 1076 ].)
Cited 2 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2013
Filed 2/27/13 Beltz v. … (Clark v. Superior Court at p. 53.) Brown here presents only one side of the facts and issues.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDepartment of the California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
33 Cal. App. 4th 1828 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1995
The claimants relied on the Board opinion in Ashman v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd (1987) 52 Cal.Comp.Cases 392, writ denied. … In Massey v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2021
Filed 3/9/21 P. v. … Quiroz identified Brown from a six-pack photographic line up. (People v. Brown (Jan. 19, 2010, B212584) [nonpub. opn.].) B.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished4 Cal. App. 2d 361 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1935
(Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal. App. 100 [ 182 Pac. 316 ]; Olson v. Whitthorne & Swan, 203 Cal. 206 [ 263 Pac. 518 , 58 A. L. R 129].) In Scellars v. Universal Service, 68 Cal. … (Flickenger v. Industrial Acc. Com., 181 Cal. 425 [ 184 Pac. 851 , 19 A. L. R. 1150]; Hedge v. Williams, 131 Cal. 455 [ 63 Pac. 721 , 64 Pac. 106 , 82 Am. St. Rep. 366 ]; Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal.
Cited 18 timesPublished
Ask Donna