Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.97s
Palmieri v. Cal. State Personnel Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2018
Brown) should not have been allowed to testify. She does not challenge the testimony of G. Brown, an ALJ who testified favorably for her. … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-184 [describing the reasons leading to vesting the Board with constitutional protection via an initiative measure]; Professional Engineers in Cal. Government v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPalmieri v. Cal. State Personnel Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2018
Brown) should not have been allowed to testify. She does not challenge the testimony of G. Brown, an ALJ who testified favorably for her. … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-184 [describing the reasons leading to vesting the Board with constitutional protection via an initiative measure]; Professional Engineers in Cal. Government v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLos Angeles Board of Adjusters v. Independent Automatic Sprinkler Co.
121 Cal. App. 279 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1932
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthwest Financial, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
229 Cal. App. 3d 198 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1991
Dist. v. … Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTownsend v. County of Los Angeles
49 Cal. App. 3d 263 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1975
(E.g., Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, 18 Cal.2d 586, 591-592 [ 116 P.2d 593 ]; Gilbaugh v. Bautzer, 3 Cal.App.3d 793, 796 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 806 ]; Brown v. Hanford Elementary Sch. … (See Armstrong v. Howell, supra, 371 F.Supp. 48, 55 .) *270 He mistakenly relies on Cleveland Board of Education v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedPatterson Joint Unified School District v. State Board of Education
244 Cal. App. 2d 921 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1966
City of Taft, 47 Cal.2d 177 [ 302 P.2d 574 ] ; Casmalia School Dist. v. … As said in Chico High School Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCarpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. Jones & Anderson
195 Cal. App. 3d 1221 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1987
(See George Day Const. v. United Broth, of Carpenters (9th Cir. 1984) 722 F.2d 1471, 1477-1479 ; Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736, 739-742 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230, 233-236 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ].) In Holly Sugar Corp. v. … Council of Laborers v.
Cited 2 timesPublished69 Cal. App. 2d 285 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1945
In the second instance, the district attorney stated that the two agents of the State Board of Medical Examiners had learned of the situation when Dr. Levin called them in regard to Mrs. Brown. … Brown was an accomplice, his evidence may be accepted as further corroboration of the *300 testimony of Mrs. Brown (People v. Clapp, 24 Cal.2d 835 [ 151 P.2d 237 ]; People v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedGreat-West Life Assurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization
19 Cal. App. 4th 1553 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1993
The Board focused on the legal fiction created in Metropolitan, of the employer as the agent for the *1559 insurer. The Board discussed the impact of the federal decision in General Motors Corp. v. … (Provience v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedConcord Communities v. City of Concord
91 Cal. App. 4th 1407 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2001
(Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley, supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 168 , italics added; cf. Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, supra, 137 F.2d at p. 665 .) … (Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, supra, 137 F.2d at p. 665 .)
Cited 30 timesPublishedKatenkamp v. Department of Finance
9 Cal. App. 2d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1935
(Frasher v. Rader, 124 Cal. 132 [ 56 Pac. 797 ]; Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].) Petitioner also attacks the constitutionality of the act under which the permits were issued. … S.) 652]), which is limited by section 1074 of the Code of Civil Procedure to an inquiry as to whether “the inferior tribunal, board or officer has regularly pursued the authority of such tribunal, board or officer”.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrancas Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Malibu
41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2006
(See Southern California Edison Co. v. … (Shapiro, supra, 96 Cal.App.4th at p. 917 ; accord, Shapiro v. Board of Directors (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 170, 185 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 826 ].)
Cited 27 timesPublishedLos Angeles Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board
191 Cal. App. 3d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1986
(San Mateo City School Dist. v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (1983) 33 Cal.3d 850, 856 [ 191 Cal.Rptr. 800 , 663 P.2d 523 ].) … (See N.L.R.B. v. North Shore University Hosp. (2d Cir. 1983) 724 F.2d 269 , 273.)
Cited 2 timesPublishedCounty of San Luis Obispo v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 246 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2001
Such problems, however, may be met by the board in determining reasonableness of the delay. . . … In Rhiner v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 1 timesPublished177 Cal. App. 3d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1986
(Weinberg v. Weinberg, supra, 61 Cal.2d at p. 566.) … Also, Harold testified that there was no mention of the option grant before the board acted.
Cited 22 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. State Public Works Board v. Superior Court
91 Cal. App. 3d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1979
The record reveals no other overtures made to the Public Works Board or any statements made by the board concerning future acquisition of Pacific View Estates properties. … In Dahl v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 2013
Filed 10/8/13 Brown v. … Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2)(C); see Vons Companies, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2021
Filed 8/30/21 Horowitz v. … Interest v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 241, 247.) The common fund doctrine was approved by the California Supreme Court in the corporate shareholder context in Fox v. Hale & Norcross S. M.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCalifornia State Automobile Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization
44 Cal. App. 3d 13 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1974
The Board contends, further, that the word “credited” is alternative to and coequal with the word “returned.” In Ind. Indem. Exch. v. … Sims, J., and Brown (H.C.), J., * concurred.
Cited 0 timesPublished17 Cal. App. 3d 807 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1971
. *814 Code, §§ 701-707) were recently rejected by this court (Division Four) in People v. Brown, 13 Cal.App.3d 876 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 904 ]. … People v.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna