Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

0.97s

  • Palmieri v. Cal. State Personnel Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2018

    Brown) should not have been allowed to testify. She does not challenge the testimony of G. Brown, an ALJ who testified favorably for her. … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-184 [describing the reasons leading to vesting the Board with constitutional protection via an initiative measure]; Professional Engineers in Cal. Government v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palmieri v. Cal. State Personnel Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2018

    Brown) should not have been allowed to testify. She does not challenge the testimony of G. Brown, an ALJ who testified favorably for her. … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-184 [describing the reasons leading to vesting the Board with constitutional protection via an initiative measure]; Professional Engineers in Cal. Government v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Los Angeles Board of Adjusters v. Independent Automatic Sprinkler Co.

    121 Cal. App. 279 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1932

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northwest Financial, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

    229 Cal. App. 3d 198 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1991

    Dist. v. … Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. County of Los Angeles

    49 Cal. App. 3d 263 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1975

    (E.g., Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, 18 Cal.2d 586, 591-592 [ 116 P.2d 593 ]; Gilbaugh v. Bautzer, 3 Cal.App.3d 793, 796 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 806 ]; Brown v. Hanford Elementary Sch. … (See Armstrong v. Howell, supra, 371 F.Supp. 48, 55 .) *270 He mistakenly relies on Cleveland Board of Education v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Patterson Joint Unified School District v. State Board of Education

    244 Cal. App. 2d 921 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1966

    City of Taft, 47 Cal.2d 177 [ 302 P.2d 574 ] ; Casmalia School Dist. v. … As said in Chico High School Board v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. Jones & Anderson

    195 Cal. App. 3d 1221 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1987

    (See George Day Const. v. United Broth, of Carpenters (9th Cir. 1984) 722 F.2d 1471, 1477-1479 ; Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736, 739-742 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230, 233-236 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ].) In Holly Sugar Corp. v. … Council of Laborers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Pierson

    69 Cal. App. 2d 285 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1945

    In the second instance, the district attorney stated that the two agents of the State Board of Medical Examiners had learned of the situation when Dr. Levin called them in regard to Mrs. Brown. … Brown was an accomplice, his evidence may be accepted as further corroboration of the *300 testimony of Mrs. Brown (People v. Clapp, 24 Cal.2d 835 [ 151 P.2d 237 ]; People v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Great-West Life Assurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    19 Cal. App. 4th 1553 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1993

    The Board focused on the legal fiction created in Metropolitan, of the employer as the agent for the *1559 insurer. The Board discussed the impact of the federal decision in General Motors Corp. v. … (Provience v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Concord Communities v. City of Concord

    91 Cal. App. 4th 1407 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2001

    (Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley, supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 168 , italics added; cf. Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, supra, 137 F.2d at p. 665 .) … (Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, supra, 137 F.2d at p. 665 .)

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Katenkamp v. Department of Finance

    9 Cal. App. 2d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1935

    (Frasher v. Rader, 124 Cal. 132 [ 56 Pac. 797 ]; Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].) Petitioner also attacks the constitutionality of the act under which the permits were issued. … S.) 652]), which is limited by section 1074 of the Code of Civil Procedure to an inquiry as to whether “the inferior tribunal, board or officer has regularly pursued the authority of such tribunal, board or officer”.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Trancas Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Malibu

    41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2006

    (See Southern California Edison Co. v. … (Shapiro, supra, 96 Cal.App.4th at p. 917 ; accord, Shapiro v. Board of Directors (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 170, 185 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 826 ].)

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Los Angeles Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

    191 Cal. App. 3d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1986

    (San Mateo City School Dist. v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (1983) 33 Cal.3d 850, 856 [ 191 Cal.Rptr. 800 , 663 P.2d 523 ].) … (See N.L.R.B. v. North Shore University Hosp. (2d Cir. 1983) 724 F.2d 269 , 273.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • County of San Luis Obispo v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 246 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2001

    Such problems, however, may be met by the board in determining reasonableness of the delay. . . … In Rhiner v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Nelson

    177 Cal. App. 3d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1986

    (Weinberg v. Weinberg, supra, 61 Cal.2d at p. 566.) … Also, Harold testified that there was no mention of the option grant before the board acted.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. State Public Works Board v. Superior Court

    91 Cal. App. 3d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1979

    The record reveals no other overtures made to the Public Works Board or any statements made by the board concerning future acquisition of Pacific View Estates properties. … In Dahl v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Foigelman CA4/3

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 2013

    Filed 10/8/13 Brown v. … Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2)(C); see Vons Companies, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Horowitz v. Brown CA4/3

    California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2021

    Filed 8/30/21 Horowitz v. … Interest v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 241, 247.) The common fund doctrine was approved by the California Supreme Court in the corporate shareholder context in Fox v. Hale & Norcross S. M.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • California State Automobile Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization

    44 Cal. App. 3d 13 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1974

    The Board contends, further, that the word “credited” is alternative to and coequal with the word “returned.” In Ind. Indem. Exch. v. … Sims, J., and Brown (H.C.), J., * concurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. McFarland

    17 Cal. App. 3d 807 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1971

    . *814 Code, §§ 701-707) were recently rejected by this court (Division Four) in People v. Brown, 13 Cal.App.3d 876 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 904 ]. … People v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.