Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.11s
Spreckels v. City & County of San Francisco
76 Cal. App. 267 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1926
Co. v. Wannamaker & Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 [ 90 S. W. 737, 743 ].) … Where fair and impartial minds may draw different conclusions from the evidence though there be no conflict therein, the conclusions drawn by the trial court must be sustained on appeal (Kelly v. Brown, 2 Cal.
Cited 10 timesPublishedTahoe Keys Property Owners' Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control Board
23 Cal. App. 4th 1459 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1994
The new legislation retained from prior law the concept of enforcement of water quality objectives through nine regional boards, but gave the regional boards and the State Water Resources Control Board greater powers and … (IT Corp. v. County of Imperial, supra, 35 Cal.3d at p. 69 ; Camp v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d at p. 357 .)
Cited 28 timesPublishedBrown v. Mid-Century Ins. CA2/7
215 Cal. App. 4th 841 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 2013
Filed 4/2/13 Brown v. Mid-Century Ins. … Co. v.
Cited 19 timesUnpublishedTex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
135 Cal. App. 3d 906 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1982
Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. Petitioner, Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. … Heinz Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBonzi v. People ex rel. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
216 Cal. App. 4th 1085 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2013
While the account is not a payment to the Board, and in fact the Board does not have an interest in or claim to this money, it must be maintained in the account. … In Wood v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2014
Filed 1/22/14 P. v. … (People v. Rodriguez (1990) 51 Cal.3d 437, 439.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFrench v. Board of Education of Santa Monica Unified School District
265 Cal. App. 2d 955 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1968
Although an offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted, but not afterwards, (Sherman v. Board of Trustees, 9 Cal.App.2d 262, 266 [ 49 P.2d 350 ] ; Shade v. … (Drennen v. Star Paving Co., supra.) The judgment is affirmed. Herndon, J., and Fleming, J., concurred.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCounty of Orange v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board No. 1
13 Cal. App. 4th 524 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1993
(Trailer Train Co. v. … Co. v. County of Orange (1985) 187 Cal.App.3d 1141, 1147 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 233 ].) The selection of a particular method of valuation from among the valid methods rests in the Board’s discretion. (Trailer Train Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDa Vinci Group v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
5 Cal. App. 4th 24 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1992
(Barnes v. Chamberlain (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 762, 767 [ 195 Cal.Rptr. 417 ].) “The construction of a municipal ordinance is governed by the same rules as the construction of statutes.” (City of Los Angeles v. … Da Vinci claims the board’s rules impermissibly expand the scope of the Ordinance (Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com., supra, 43 Cal.3d at p. 1389 ) and its live-work policy directly conflicts with it.
Cited 21 timesPublishedAss'n of Graduate Student Employees v. Public Employment Relations Board
6 Cal. App. 4th 1133 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1992
In Regents of University of California v. … Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWilliam Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
163 Cal. App. 3d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1984
{Continental Insurance Company v. N.L.R.B., supra, 495 F.2d at p. 48 .) As was said in Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. … {Labor Board v. Insurance Agents (1960) 361 U.S. 477 [ 4 L.Ed.2d 454 , 80 S.Ct. 419 ].)
Cited 5 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2022
Filed 6/21/22 Cockren v. … (Ike v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMola Development Corp. v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board No. 2
95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 546 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2000
(See Westling v. … In Westling v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedFarnham v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
60 Cal. App. 4th 69 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1997
of the Board” of Sequoia. … Joseph Brown and Mr. E. R. Whitehurst, both members of Sequoia’s Board.”
Cited 30 timesPublishedMalibu Committee for Inc. v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
222 Cal. App. 3d 397 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1990
(County of Sacramento v. Hickman (1967) 66 Cal.2d 841, 849, fn. 6 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 428 P.2d 593 ].) Further, a construction rendering statutory language surplusage is to be avoided. (Brown v. … (Stillwell v. State Bar (1946) 29 Cal.2d 119, 123 [ 173 P.2d 313 ].) However, terms and conditions, as used in the Act, is not a term of art with a particularized legal meaning. (See Sun’n Sand, Inc. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2013
Filed 12/20/13 P. v. … We granted Brown permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSteve P. Rados, Inc. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board
89 Cal. App. 3d 590 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1979
By some of its arguments and its citation to Drysdale v. … (See Bixby v. Pierno, supra, 4 Cal.3d at p. 149, incl. fn. 22; see also Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners, 7 Cal.3d 64, 76 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ]; cf. Lewin v. St.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRedwood Coast Watersheds Alliance v. State Board of Forestry & Fire Protection
83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 24 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1999
City of Hayward (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1716, 1723 [ 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 752 ]; Cook v. Craig (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 773 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 712 ]; Davis v. Superior Court (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 1054 [ 215 Cal.Rptr. 721 ]; Newland v. … Kizer (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 647 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 450 ]; Sklar v. Franchise Tax Board (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 616 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 42 ].) Appellants respond that the cases cited by RCWA are unavailing (see, e.g., Newland v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedRegents of the University of California v. State Board of Equalization
73 Cal. App. 3d 660 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1977
(Kaiser v. Hopkins (1936) 6 Cal.2d 537, 538-539 [ 58 P.2d 1278 ]; Fields v. Eu (1976) 18 Cal.3d 322, 327 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 367 , 556 P.2d 729 ]; Pitts v. Reagan (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 112, 118 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 27 ].) … (Fellowship of Humanity v. Co. of Alameda (1957) 153 Cal.App.2d 673, 680-681 [ 315 P.2d 394 ]; Westminister Memorial Park v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 2021
Filed 9/27/21 P. v. … (People v. Brown (March 8, 2016, B255316) [nonpub. opn.].)
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna