Case law

Circle K Ranch Corp. v. Board of Sup'rs

94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 97 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 2000

94 Cal.Rptr.2d 97 (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 194 CIRCLE K RANCH CORP., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of the County of Santa Barbara, Defendant and Respondent. No. B124996. … (See Hayward v.

People v. Brown CA2/5

California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2023

Filed 1/11/23 P. v. … (People v. Brown (June 24, 2021, B300869) [nonpub. opn.].) 3 prison sentence he could face if he went to trial and were convicted.

Johnson Rancho County Water District v. State Water Rights Board

235 Cal. App. 2d 863 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1965

Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing Board, 36 Cal.2d 167, 174-175 [ 223 P.2d 1 ].) … (Temescal Water Co. v.

People v. Brown CA6

California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2020

Filed 10/6/20 P. v. … Brown forfeited this issue. (Evid. Code, § 353; People v. Dowl (2013) 57 Cal.4th 1079, 1087.)

People v. Brown CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 2015

Filed 1/9/15 P. v. … (People v. Tuadles (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1777, 1783-1784; See People v. Garcia (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 715, 720; cf. U.S. v. Maynard (2010) 615 F.3d 544, 564 with U.S. v.

People v. Brown CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 2022

Filed 12/21/22 P. v. … (People v.

Natomas Unified School Dist. v. Sac. County Board of Educ.

California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 2023

(See Davis v. … (California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 488, 501; see also Purifoy v.

Mascaro v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 2023

Filed 1/19/23 Mascaro v. … The Mascaros quote from Brown Bark III, L.P. v. Haver (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 809, 820, which states: “Tort and other noncontract claims are not subject to section 1717.”

People v. Morgan

23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 224 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2005

(People v. Nealy, supra, 228 Cal.App.3d at p. 450 .) … Morgan and Brown offer People v. Scalzi (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 901 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 61 ], as a better reasoned case.

South Bay Union School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

228 Cal. App. 3d 502 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1991

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 198 [citations].) … In Labor Board v.

Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 348 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2003

. *1724 The Board is correct in that “earning capacity at the time of injury is the touchstone of average earnings in California.” ( West v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1947) 79 Cal.App.2d 711, 722 [ 180 P.2d 972 ].) … Stentz urges us to affirm the Board’s use of earning capacity and application of section 4453, subdivision (c)(4) to his circumstances. In support, at oral argument he relied on Grossmont Hospital v. Workers’ Comp.

Hugo Neu-Proler International Sales Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

195 Cal. App. 3d 326 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1987

(Anaconda Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 15, 25 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 640 ].) … Forman Co., Inc. v. C.I.R., supra, 453 F.2d at p. 1153 .) We believe that the Board similarly flies from reality, and flees from common sense.

Lake Madrone Water District v. State Water Resources Control Board

209 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1989

(Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 31 Cal.3d 124, 135 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 732 , 642 P.2d 792 ]; Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130, 143, fn. 10 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ].) B. … City Council (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 546, 556 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 812 ]; see EPA v. State Water Resources Control Board (1976) 426 U.S. 200, 205-208 [ 48 L.Ed.2d 578, 583-585 , 96 S.Ct. 2022 ]; United States v.

People v. Brown CA1/5

California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 2023

Filed 1/10/23 P. v. … People v.

Epstein v. BID II

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 2, 2001

The Purpose Behind the Brown Act The Brown Act, the open meeting law applicable here, is intended to ensure the public's right to attend the meetings of public agencies. ( Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. … Therefore, under the Brown Act, as interpreted by us in International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v.

Thomas S. Castle Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

140 Cal. App. 3d 668 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1983

Brown (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 69, 72-73 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 598 ].) Castle Farms urges that this case falls within the exception to this proscription of direct judicial review enunciated in Leedom v. … (Dessert Seed Co. v. Brown, supra, 96 Cal.App.3d at pp. 74-76; United Farm Workers v. Superior Court, supra, 72 Cal.App.3d at p. 275; J.R. Norton Co. v.

Cohan v. City of Thousand Oaks

30 Cal. App. 4th 547 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1994

The Brown Act. … or the appeal board.

Agosto v. Board of Trustees of Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District

189 Cal. App. 4th 330 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 2010

(Agosto v. Board of Trustees of the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College Dist. (July 29, 2008, D051045) [nonpub. opn.].) … After about 30 years of experience with governing board meetings in compliance with the Brown Act, I was very knowledgeable [about] the requirements for and limitations on closed session matters, votes, and reports out in

People v. Brown CA2/4

California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 2014

The trial court denied appellant Robert Lee Brown’s “Petition for Modification of Sentence to Comply with Prison Population Reduction Order on Plata v. Brown.” (See Brown v. Plata (2011) ___ U.S. ___ [131 S. … v.

Santa Clara County District Attorney Investigators Ass'n v. County of Santa Clara

51 Cal. App. 3d 255 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1975

The County of Santa Clara, its board of supervisors, personnel board, and director of personnel (hereinafter collectively referred to as County) appeal from that portion of a judgment, entered after trial by court, prohibiting … In 1963, in Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v.