Case law

Noack v. Zellerbach

11 Cal. App. 2d 186 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 1936

The above rule was applied in Booth v. Lloyd, 33 Fed. 593 , and in Mister v. Brown, 59 Fed. 909 , to situations arising out of facts very similar to those of the instant case. … Brown, supra, was a libel in admiralty against the Maryland board of public works and a deputy commander of a state fishing sloop for the death of the master of an oyster-dredging schooner, who, when fleeing to escape arrest

K. C. Working Chemical Co. v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance

82 Cal. App. 2d 120 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1947

Fred Brown was the clerk of Edward Brown & Sons, agents of Agricul *133 tural Insurance Company, with authority to accept business and issue cover notes but not to make out or sign policies. … Brown here [pointing to a person in the courtroom] was at his desk putting his things away, that is, Mr.

Mary's Kitchen v. City of Orange

California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 2023

Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.; Brown Act). Plaintiff Mary’s Kitchen provides homeless services in the City of Orange. … (City of Cotati v.

Sinaiko v. Superior Court

19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 371 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2004

(Brown v. … Again, the cases cited by the Board bear no resemblance to the matter at hand. In both Saad v. City of Berkeley (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1206 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 95 ] (Saad) and Desmond v.

Shaver v. Shaver

107 Cal. App. 3d 788 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1980

Co. v. County of L.A. (1960) 54 Cal.2d 450, 459 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 24 , 353 P.2d 736 ]). In Neel v. … But such rights still must be ad *794 judicated pursuant to the rule applicable in 1967, as laid down in Brown.

Long Beach Firemen's Credit Union v. Franchise Tax Board

128 Cal. App. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1982

(Woodland Production Credit Assn. v. Franchise Tax Board (1964) 225 Cal.App.2d 293, 300, fn. 3 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 231 ].) … (Woodland Production Credit Assn. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 225 Cal.App.2d at pp. 298-299.)

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

123 Cal. Rptr. 2d 278 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2002

(Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. … (Walsh v. Kirby, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 106 .) C.

Morse v. San Diego High School Board of Education

34 Cal. App. 134 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1917

As to whether there was a conspiracy among the members of the board of education is wholly immaterial, in view of the authority of the board to dispense with the services of any teacher at the end of any school year without … Any rule governing a subcommittee of the board of education certainly would not have the effect to qualify the authority of the board itself as given by the statute.

Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization

232 Cal. App. 3d 1048 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1991

Mission Pak Co. v. … Brown, p. 2; June 23, 1959, InterDepartmental Communication from the Dept, of Finance to Governor Brown; and Bill Mem. dated July 14, 1959, from Julian Beck to Governor Brown, all regarding Assem.

Southern California Edison Co. v. State Water Resources Control Board

116 Cal. App. 3d 751 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1981

Company and the trial court each rely on dicta in Appalachian Power Co. v. … (See Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28, 29 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 805 , 520 P.2d 29 ].) The regional board’s order is ólearly insufficient in this respect.

J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

162 Cal. App. 3d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1984

Courts may not substitute their judgment for that of the Board on matters within the Board’s discretion. (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Ins. … Appeals Bd. (1981) 29 Cal.3d 101, 111 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 194 , 624 P.2d 244 ], Montebello Rose Co. v.

County of San Luis Obispo v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 690 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2005

The court is not bound by the WCAB’s conclusions of law and it is for the court “to decide whether the facts found by the Board constitute a violation of section 132a.” (Barns v. Workers’ Comp. … This standard is not met “ ‘by simply isolating evidence which supports the board and ignoring other relevant facts of record which rebut or explain that evidence.’ ” (Western Electric Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 579 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 2001

County v. Board of Supervisors (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1332, 1336 , [ 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 ]) (hereafter FUTURE) quoting from Corona-Norco Unified School Dist. v. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 564 .)

Ratchford v. County of Sonoma

22 Cal. App. 3d 1056 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1972

Significantly in Brown v. … In Brown v.

A. S. Schulman Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization

49 Cal. App. 3d 180 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1975

The trial court concluded that under King v. State Bd. of Equalization, 22 Cal.App.3d 1006 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 802 ], and Ruling No. 11 of the Board (Cal. Admin. … (See Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. Cal. Emp. Com., 24 Cal.2d 753, 757-758 [ 151 P.2d 233 , 155 A.L.R. 405 ]; Nelson v. Dean, 27 Cal.2d 873, 875 [ 168 P.2d 16 , 168 A.L.R. 467 ]; Coan v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

131 Cal. App. 2d 638 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1955

The tax was levied by defendant Board upon plaintiff for storage and use in California of certain items of tangible personal property hereinafter set forth. … The Legislature, in section 6366, has specifically exempted ‘aircraft’ from the tax levied by defendant Board herein.

Santa Monica Community College District v. Public Employment Relations Board

112 Cal. App. 3d 684 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1980

(Coleman v. Miller (1939) 307 U.S. 433 [ 83 L.Ed. 1385 , 59 S.Ct. 972 ,. 122 A.L.R. 695 ]; Williams v. Mayor (1933) 289 U.S. 36 [ 77 L.Ed. 1015 , 53 S.Ct. 431 ]; Trenton v. … The decision of the Public Employment Relations Board is affirmed. Stephens, Acting P. J., and Hastings, J., concurred.

People v. Brown CA2/5

California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2015

Filed 8/7/15 P. v. … (People v. Brown (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1, 6-7 (Brown).)

Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations Board

220 Cal. App. 3d 346 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1990

The Board cites British Auto Parts, Inc. v. N. L. R. … V.

People v. Brown CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 2015

Filed 8/12/15 P. v. … (People v.