Case law

San Mateo County Harbor District v. Board of Supervisors

273 Cal. App. 2d 165 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1969

The district attorney then advised the commission that if it passed the matter on to the county board of supervisors, it would in effect be indicating that it favored the dissolution of plaintiff district. … “Commissioner Lawson moved approval of the adoption of a resolution referring the matter of the dissolution of the San Mateo County Harbor District to the Board of Supervisors.

Yellow Cab Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

194 Cal. App. 2d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1961

McOmie v. Board of Directors of the Veterans' Home

88 Cal. App. 16 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1927

The prayer of the complaint does not ask for an examination by the board of the claims of plaintiff. Having no right to bring an action in this form it must follow that the judgment, in its present form, is void. … the instant one, they may have been compelled by writ of mandate to act and order the claim paid, and their secretary-treasurer may be directed to pay the same and thus any attempted arbitrary action on the part of this board

Stanton & Sons v. County of Los Angeles

78 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1947

Respondent endeavors to show a similarity of Brown v. Maryland to the case at bar. … The License Cases merely followed Brown v.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 2021

Filed 6/7/21 P. v. … No. 19FE015841) v. STANLEY RAY BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.

French Art Cleaners v. State Board of Dry Cleaners

88 Cal. App. 2d 45 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1948

It appears from the record that acting pursuant to sections 9563-9566 of the Business and Professions Code (Stats. 1945, pp. 2847-8) the defendant and appellant State Board of Dry Cleaners established a minimum price scale … The Supreme Court said in Food & Grocery Bureau v.

Nielsen Freight Lines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

113 Cal. App. 3d 434 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1980

Hegglin v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 4 Cal.3d 162 .) … The rule of Wilkinson v. Workers’ Comp.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2021

No. 17FE017680) v. MARKEES BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. This case arises out of a drive-by shooting in a residential neighborhood in north Sacramento. … A jury found defendant Markees Brown guilty of three counts of willful, deliberate, and premeditated attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187, subd.

Inyo Citizens for Better Planning v. Inyo County Board of Supervisors

180 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2009

(City of Redlands v. … (Bhatt v. State Dept. of Health Services (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 923, 928 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 335 ].) On January 11, 2005, the Board affirmed the Planning Commission’s decision to approve TPM No. 357.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

251 Cal. App. 2d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1967

Pursuant to this opinion, the board awarded the applicant compensation for a permanent disability of 60 percent. … The board denied reconsideration on January 6,1967.

Auerbach v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board No. 2

167 Cal. App. 4th 1428 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 2008

(Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 368, 387 [ 146 Cal.Rptr. 892 ][.])’ (Orinda Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 1145, 1160 [ 227 Cal.Rptr. 688 ].)” (Stolman v. … (Bonnell v. Medical Board (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1264-1265 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 532 , 82 P.3d 740 ].) The Appeals Board’s interpretation is also entitled to considerable deference. (See Los Altos El Granada Investors v.

Coast Elevator Co. v. State Board of Equalization

186 Cal. App. 3d 206 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1986

In determining that Coast was a manufacturer of fixtures, the trial court relied upon Montgomery Elevator Co. v. … (See Wolfe v. Lipsy (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 633, 643-644 [ 209 Cal.Rptr. 801 ].)

San Francisco Fire Fighters, Local 798 v. Retirement Board

143 Cal. App. 3d 604 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1983

The plaintiff sought a peremptory writ to compel the Retirement Board of the San Francisco City and County Employees’ Retirement System (Board) to include roughly three and one-half years Del Bene received disability retirement … (See LePage v. City of Oakland, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 695 ; Neeley v. Board of Retirement (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 815, 822 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 841 ].)

Givoni v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

234 Cal. App. 3d 94 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1991

The Board aptly notes that the use of any rollback date must reflect a fair market value to satisfy the constitutional requirement of due process (Birkenfeld v. … (Vega v. City of West Hollywood (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1342, 1349 [ 273 Cal.Rptr. 243 ].)

Hamilton v. Town of Los Gatos

213 Cal. App. 3d 1050 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1989

We examine the Brown Act first. … The Brown Act The general rule under the Brown Act (the Act) is that all meetings of the legislative body of a local agency shall be open and public. (§ 54953; Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v.

Cod Gas & Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

59 Cal. App. 4th 756 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1997

(See Rider v. County of San Diego (1991) 1 Cal.4th 1, 5 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 490 , 820 P.2d 1000 ] (Rider I); Kuykendall v. … In Rider v.

Davey Tree Surgery Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

167 Cal. App. 3d 1232 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 1985

(Gaehwiler v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd. (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 1041, 1045 [ 191 Cal.Rptr. 336 ] [hereafter *1240 Gaehwiler], citing Newbery Electric Corp. v. … (Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers’ Comp.

National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd. v. State Board of Equalization

90 Cal. App. 3d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1979

NAL and the Board moved for summary judgment and the motion of the Board was granted. … Since tax exemption statutes must be strictly construed against the taxpayer (Garrett Corp. v. State Board of Equal. (1961) 189 Cal.App.2d 504, 509 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 421 ]; Bay Cities Transp. Co. v.

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

91 Cal. App. 3d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1979

Petitioners Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Southern California Permanente Medical Group (Kaiser) contend that the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) erred in equitably charging against its lien for medical services … II In Mann v.

Scheid Vineyards & Management Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

22 Cal. App. 4th 139 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1994

[Wine World, Inc. v. … Norton Co. v.