Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.75s
Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 789 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2005
(Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 793 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 624 , 952 P.2d 641 ].) … Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 102, 109 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 674 , 577 P.2d 1014 ]; see Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819, 831 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ]; see Callet v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2024
Filed 10/1/24 P. v. … (People v. Brown (Mar. 9, 2021, B303601) [nonpub. opn.] (Brown II).)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCarl Joseph Maggio, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
154 Cal. App. 3d 40 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1984
General counsel of the Board has the burden of proving unlawful conduct (Rivcom Corp. v. … The consolidated case, Vessey & Company, Inc. v. A.L.R.B., is remanded to the Board for consideration of the striking employees’ reinstatement rights as economic strikers. Brown (Gerald), P. J., concurred.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIndependent Energy Producers Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization
22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 562 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 2004
Again, per the declaration of Andrew Brown, and Exhibit B thereto, at least 21 of 43 companies have [Department of Water Resources] contracts.” … V.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCentral Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control Board
17 Cal. App. 4th 621 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1993
(State of South Dakota v. Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 777 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 576 P.2d 473 ].) “. . . … (State of South Dakota v. Brown, supra, 20 Cal.3d at p. 777.) B. The statute as interpreted by the Board does not violate equal protection.
Cited 39 timesPublishedAkin v. Board of Education of Riverside Unified School District
262 Cal. App. 2d 161 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1968
(See Finot v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 250 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 520 ].) … (Finot v. Pasadena City Board of Education, supra; see also Blackwell v. Issaquena County Board of Education, 363 F.2d 749 ; cf. Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744 .)
Cited 20 timesPublishedMorgan v. City of Los Angeles Board of Pension Commissioners
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 468 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2000
Board of Education (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 729, 733 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 924 ].) … We agree with the board’s interpretation.
Cited 34 timesPublishedPhilips & Ober Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization
231 Cal. App. 3d 723 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1991
(Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ]; see also Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280 [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ].) … (Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 60 Cal.2d at 181 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
19 Cal. App. 4th 1645 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1993
We shall affirm the Board’s decision denying reconsideration. … In Gonzalez v. Workmen’s Comp.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Protective Ass'n v. Board of Police Commissioners
14 Cal. App. 249 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1910
making it entirely discretionary with the board of police commissioners, and there being nothing to show that it was the duty of such board of police commissioners to issue such permit, and the writ of mandate being a prerogative … writ, which issues only in cases where it is made the duty of any inferior tribunal, board, or person, by reason of their office, to do some act, and there being no such duty imposed upon this board, the judgment is affirmed
Cited 1 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 2016
Filed 2/29/16 P. v. … (People v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 2016
Filed 2/29/16 P. v. … (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 553; People v. Samayoa (1997) 15 Cal.4th 795, 841.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 2016
Filed 3/10/16 P. v. … BA430468) v. KENYON BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. THE COURT:* A jury convicted Kenyon Brown (defendant) of selling cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSan Juan Teachers Ass'n v. San Juan Unified School District
44 Cal. App. 3d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1974
(Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].) … Under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, “the employer is required to make counter-proposals” (East Bay Mun. Employees Union v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedKim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & California Compensation Insurance
87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 382 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1999
’ ” (Avalon Bay Foods v. … (Arlington Heights v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
119 Cal. App. 3d 193 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1981
(Litzmann v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 203, 204 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 731 ]; Nat. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1943) 58 Cal.App.2d 508, 509 [ 136 P.2d 815 ]; Laue v. Workers’ Comp. … (See Alford v. Industrial Accident Com. (1946) 28 Cal.2d 198, 199-201 [ 169 P.2d 641 ]; Nat. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, 58 Cal.App.2d at p. 509 ; Neal v. Industrial Acc.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSan Carlos School District v. State Board of Education
258 Cal. App. 2d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1968
(See Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429 [ 96 L.Ed. 475 , 72 S.Ct. 394 ]; Tileston v. Ullman, 318 U.S. 44 [ 87 L.Ed. 603 , 63 S.Ct. 493 ]; County of Ventura v. Southern Cal. … Dist. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCalifornia-Western States Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization
151 Cal. App. 2d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1957
Cited 1 timesPublishedJeffer, Mangels & Butler v. Glickman
234 Cal. App. 3d 1432 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1991
As the Supreme Court noted in Brown v. … (Brown v. Colm, supra, 11 Cal.3d at pp. 645-646.)
Cited 12 timesPublishedSan Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.
86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 473 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1999
Handlery Hotel, Inc., 1 appeals a judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 631.8 in favor of San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) in a condemnation proceeding where the trial court held Handlery … (San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Holding Co. (June 18, 1988) D027841, D028679 [nonpub. opn.].)
Cited 49 timesPublished
Ask Donna