Case law

American Assn. of Women v. Board of Trustees

31 Cal. App. 4th 702 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1995

In 1985, the Alameda County Superior Court, in Leticia A. v. … Two), filed its opinion in Regents of University of California v. Superior Court (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 972 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 197 ] (review den.), more commonly referred to as the Bradford decision.

Russel v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees

66 Cal. App. 2d 691 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1944

Browne. … See, also, Lloyd v.

Garland v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

210 Cal. App. 4th 557 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 2012

. §§ 1251 et seq., 1311(a), 1342(a), 1362(7), (12), (14).) 1 In Rapanos v. … See [U.S. v. Rapanos (6th Cir. 2004)] 376 F.3d[ 629,] 639[ vacated and cause remanded sub nom. Rapanos v. United States, supra, 547 U.S. 715 [ 165 L.Ed.2d 159 ]].

National Coach Corp. v. State Board of Control

137 Cal. App. 3d 750 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1982

(E.g., Rowen v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 633 , 641 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 185 ].) *756 National’s second procedural contention that the board was misled concerning its proper role is also unpersuasive. … Crangle v. City Council of Crescent City (1933) 219 Cal. 239 [ 26 P.2d 24 ]; Roscoe v. Goodale (1951) 105 Cal.App.2d 271 [ 232 P.2d 879 ].)

Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. v. Board of Pilot Com.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2015

(Board of Pilot Commissioners v. Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 581 (Pilot Commissioners).) … (Garcia v. Bellflower Unified School Dist. Governing Board, supra, 220 Cal.App.4th 4th at p. 1064.)

Sweeney v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board

California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2021

LLC v. … (Bell v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 629, 636–637.)

Cole v. City of Oakland Residential Rent Arbitration Board

3 Cal. App. 4th 693 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1992

On the other hand, Board administrator Lisa Talley-Brown expressed the view that income derived from rent increases since the petitions were filed was irrelevant, and what was important was the rent roll at the time the landlord … “Courts should let administrative boards and officers work out their problems with as little judicial interference as possible .. . .” ’ ” (Vega v.

B-L Ranch, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

266 Cal. App. 2d 192 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1968

Where the board fails to comply with this section, the court cannot fairly consider the substantive issues raised by the petition for review. (Evans v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … As we pointed out in Holcomb v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

County of San Joaquin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2004

The employer filed a motion for reconsideration, which functions like an appeal to the Board. (See County of Sacramento v. Workers’ Comp. … Many of these decisions summarize the Board’s holding, stating that a writ to the Court of Appeal was denied, and may be cited to show the administrative interpretation of the Board. (Ralphs Grocery Co. v.

People v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 2025

Filed 6/18/25 P. v. … of Parole Hearings (Board) determined that Brown was an OMHD pursuant to the criteria of section 2962.

Piano v. State ex rel. New Motor Vehicle Board

103 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1980

.’” *418 (Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Board, supra, 54 Cal.2d, at p. 529 .) In City & County of S. F. v. … In Jenner v.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. App. 3d 329 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1973

Workmen’s Appeals Board, 258 ACA 589 [ 258 Cal.App.2d 490 ( 65 Cal.Rptr. 835 )], and Fruehauf Corporation vs. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 252 ACA 600 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 718 ] .. . .” … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp App.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

70 Cal. App. 3d 599 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 1977

Hurley had contended, and the Board agreed, that on the authority of Labor Code section 4750, Smith v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1955) 44 Cal.2d 364 [ 282 P.2d 64 ] and Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Ind. Acc. … , Smith v.

Parkmerced Co. v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

215 Cal. App. 3d 490 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1989

(Miller v. Elite Ins. … (Ibid.; see also Schmitt v.

California State Employees' Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board

51 Cal. App. 4th 923 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1996

No. 51 [2 PERC *512107]; see also Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ].) In the landmark decision of Labor Board v. … No. 51 [2 PERC 12107], relying on Labor Board v. Katz, supra, 369 U.S. 736 .) A.

Seacall Development, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 229 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1999

Bank v. … Bank v. Kirk, supra, 259 Cal.App.2d at p. 355 .)

Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of Supervisors

210 Cal. App. 3d 1202 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1989

(See Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 101 Cal. 15, 24 .) In approving the agreement with USC, the Board was not performing that kind of function. … (Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 644, 652 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 620 ]; see also Quinchard v. Board of Trustees (1896) 113 Cal. 664, 671 [ 45 P. 856 ].)

Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

229 Cal. App. 3d 784 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1991

Sales Corp. v. … Dist. v.

County of San Bernardino v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

203 Cal. App. 4th 1469 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 2012

(San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1, 7 [ 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 ].) … Thus, the Board’s erroneous interpretation or application of law is a ground for annulment of its decision. (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

County of San Joaquin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 152 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2006

In reviewing questions of law, we review the Board’s determination de novo. (Smith v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 530, 535-536 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 186 ].) … The County’s claim rests solely on Leeth v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1550 [ 231 Cal.Rptr. 468 ], which it asserts was improperly ignored by the Board.