Case law

Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

20 Cal. App. 4th 1002 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1993

Standard of Review The trial court reviews the decision of the Board to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence. (Piano v. State of California ex rel. … (Morton v. Superior Court (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 977, 982 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 533 ]; Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 185 Cal.App.3d at p. 1240 .)

Imperial Termite Control, Inc. v. Structural Pest Control Board

275 Cal. App. 2d 685 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1969

V In addition to the ten-day suspension of their licenses, the *690 registrar of the hoard imposed a requirement on the 'corporate petitioner and its principal officer of an additional bond in the amount of $5,000. 10 The … (Tracy v. Contractors’ State License Board (1965) 63 Cal.2d 598, 601 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 407 P.2d 865 ].)

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. State Board of Equalization

175 Cal. App. 3d 438 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1985

(Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman (1962) 58 Cal.2d 23, 29 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 372 P.2d 649 ].) … (Bott v. American Hydrocarbon Corporation (5th Cir. 1972) 458 F.2d 229, 233 ; City of Burbank v. General Electric Company (9th Cir. 1964) 329 F.2d 825 , 832; 2A Sands, Sutherland Stat.

Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control Board

225 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In Mandel v. … In Sklar v.

American Funeral Concepts v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

136 Cal. App. 3d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1982

(Mount Vernon Memorial Park v. … Trial court review of the board decision is conducted pursuant to the independent judgment standard. (Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors (1939) 13 Cal.2d 75 [ 87 P.2d 848 ].)

Western & Southern Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

4 Cal. App. 3d 21 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1970

The Board merely considers the deduction in computing a figure which may trigger the retaliatory tax.” (Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 63 Cal.2d 222, 231-232 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 869 , 404 P.2d 477 ].) … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 63 Cal.2d 222, 226 .) It is well settled that taxes levied for the purpose of revenue may be changed at any time during the current year. (Fullerton Oil Co. v.

California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board

5 Cal. App. 4th 985 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1992

Background Petitioners brought this original proceeding for a writ of mandate compelling respondent California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to incorporate in the California Occupational Health and Safety … In Mandel v.

American Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

186 Cal. App. 3d 464 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1986

By its 1985 amendments, the Legislature essentially ratified the voluntary recusal policy practiced by the board. (See Hewitt v. … (Carmel Valley View, Ltd. v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 817, 820 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 249 ].)

County of Orange v. State Board of Control

167 Cal. App. 3d 660 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1985

However, the Board stresses the similarity between diversion and probation, arguing both constitute the imposition of a penalty. For this proposition, the Board cites People v. … (See Morse v. Municipal Court (1974) 13 Cal.3d 149, 156 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 529 P.2d 46 ].)

Montalvo v. Madera Unified School District Board of Education

21 Cal. App. 3d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1971

Rickelman (6th Cir. 1971) 441 F.2d 444 ; Stevenson v. Wheeler County Board of Education (S.D. Ga. 1969) 306 F.Supp. 97, 101 ; Jackson v. Dorrier, supra, 424 F.2d 213 ; Brick v. Board of Education, Sch. Dist. … (Goesaert v. Cleary (1948) 335 U.S. 464 [ 93 L.Ed. 163 , 69 S.Ct. 198 ]; Farrell v. Smith, supra, 310 F.Supp. 732, 737 ; Jackson v. Dorrier, supra, 424 F.2d 213, 218 ; Akin v. Board of Education of Riverside etc.

Robert G. Beloud, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

50 Cal. App. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1975

(Bentley v. Industrial Acc. Com., 75 Cal.App.2d 547, 550 [ 171 P.2d 532 ]; cf. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 [ 94 L.Ed. 865 , 872-873, 70 S.Ct. 652 ]; Adams v. … These statements of the Board recite some of the factors or criteria germane to a consideration of the value of an attorney’s service (Bentley v. Industrial Acc.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. App. 3d 374 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1973

The appeals board affirmed. The action of the referee and the board was in direct conflict with our opinion in Daniels v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 504 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 129 ]. … In that case, following our interpretation of Garcia v. Workmen’s Comp.

Hotel Del Coronado Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

15 Cal. App. 3d 612 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1971

(Hetzel v. Franchise Tax Board, 161 Cal.App.2d 224, 229 [ 326 P.2d 611 ].) As such, a tax exemption must be strictly construed against the taxpayer. (Santa Fe Transp. v. … State Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 531, 539 [ 334 P.2d 907 ]; Alalunga Sport Fishers, Inc. v.

City of South San Francisco v. Board of Equalization

232 Cal. App. 4th 707 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2014

State Board of Equalization, A137173 (South San Francisco case), Brisbane v. State Board of Equalization, A137185, and City of Alameda v. … City Petitioners rely on Diebold, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization (1959) 168 Cal.App.2d 628 and Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, but neither case supports City Petitioners’ contention.

California Hospital Ass'n v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

95 Cal. App. 3d 270 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1979

Defendant, California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (hereafter Board), 1 appeals from a summary judgment in declaratory relief in favor of plaintiffs, California Hospital Association and South Coast Community Hospital … (See §§ 1026, 1027; Carleson v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 145, 151-153 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 278 ].) CHA is a nonprofit corporation representing 550 California hospitals.

Rainbow Disposal Co. v. Escondido Mobilehome Rent Review Board

75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 746 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998

(San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. … In Yee v.

California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, & Hearing Officers in State Employment v. Brown

195 Cal. App. 4th 119 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 2011

(Stone Street Capital, LLC v. … (California Teachers Assn. v.

Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors

209 Cal. App. 3d 940 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1989

Both types of actions, however, are within the Board’s power. (Gov. Code, §§ 7910, 25207; Johnston v. City of Claremont, supra, 49 Cal.2d at p. 835 ; Blotter v. Farrell, supra, 42 Cal.2d at p. 811 .) … F. v. Market St. Ry. Co., supra, 9 Cal.2d at pp. 748-749; see also County of Placer v.

Professional Engineers in California Government v. State Personnel Board

114 Cal. App. 3d 101 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1980

Thus, in May v. … complete enforcement of a writ (Molar v.

People v. Brown CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2025

Filed 12/12/25 P. v. … (People v.