Case law

Gillespie v. San Francisco Public Library Commission

67 Cal. App. 4th 1165 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1998

The Commission’s closed session was thus permissible under both the Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance. Though no California cases address this particular issue, a similar situation was presented in Gramling v. … [Citation.]’ ” (People v. Loeun, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 9 , quoting Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315, 323 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 613 , 807 P.2d 455 ].)

City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

119 Cal. App. 3d 355 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1981

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. … (See City of Fresno v. WCAB (Burks) (1980) 45 Cal.Comp.Cases 812.)

Berkeley Police Assn. v. City of Berkeley

76 Cal. App. 3d 931 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1977

The validity of the ordinance was upheld in Brown v. … Appellants assert this constituted a violation of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, specifically Government Code section 3505, 1 which provides in pertinent part: “The governing body of a public agency, or such boards, *936 commissions

University Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

179 Cal. App. 3d 796 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1986

Its function was similar to other occupational licensing boards. (Chevrolet Motor Division v. … The Board also points to the Nissan court’s remand “for further proceedings before a Board acting without the participation of the new motor vehicle dealer members” as further support. (Nissan Motor Corp. v.

People v. Brown CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 2026

But I think that matters of rehabilitation are better handled by an institution like the parole board.” … (People v. Kipp (1998) 18 Cal.4th 349, 377.) And Brown’s argument lacks merit.

People v. Heddens

12 Cal. App. 2d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1936

Brown appeals, contending that the facts alleged in the indictment do not constitute a public offense. … (People v. Scofield, 203 Cal. 703 [ 265 Pac. 914 ]; People v. Bill, 140 Cal. App. 389 [ 35 Pac. (2d) 645 ]; People v. Peck, 43 Cal. App. 638 [ 185 Pac. 881 ]; People v. Wagner, 65 Cal. App. 704 [ 225 Pac. 464 ].)

City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

88 Cal. App. 3d 19 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1978

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … (Coltharp) supra, 35 Cal.App.3d 329 , and by the appeals board in Ferguson v. City of Oxnard, 35 Cal. Comp. Cases 452 (appeals board en banc opinion, 1970).

Tyra v. Board of Police and Fire Pension Commissioners

71 Cal. App. 2d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1945

By his petition for a writ of mandate the plaintiff sought to compel the defendant, Board of Police and Pire Commissioners, to retire him from active service in the fire department and to award him a pension under the provisions … For a determination of that question see Larson v. Board of Police *55 & Fire Pension Commissioners et al., post, p. 60 [ 162 P.2d 33 ], filed this date. The judgment is reversed. Shinn, Acting P.

Faber v. Board of Pension Commissioners of Los Angeles

56 Cal. App. 2d 825 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1943

Defendants and appellants are the Board of Pension Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles and certain individuals who constitute the board. … As we understand the findings in our case they purport to decide the same questions of fact that were held in Baker v. Board of Fire P. F.

Stress Care, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

26 Cal. App. 4th 909 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1994

Moradi and Stress Care to pay a $1,000 civil penalty to respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) and recommended that the Board institute contempt proceedings against Dr. Moradi and Stress Care. … (Ornelas v. Randolph (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1095, 1101 [ 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 594 , 847 P.2d 560 ].)

Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

20 Cal. App. 4th 1002 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1993

Standard of Review The trial court reviews the decision of the Board to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence. (Piano v. State of California ex rel. … (Morton v. Superior Court (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 977, 982 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 533 ]; Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 185 Cal.App.3d at p. 1240 .)

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

221 Cal. App. 3d 198 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1990

Industry Assn. v. Governing Board, supra, 206 Cal.App.3d at pp. 236-237.) … v.

Imperial Termite Control, Inc. v. Structural Pest Control Board

275 Cal. App. 2d 685 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1969

V In addition to the ten-day suspension of their licenses, the *690 registrar of the hoard imposed a requirement on the 'corporate petitioner and its principal officer of an additional bond in the amount of $5,000. 10 The … (Tracy v. Contractors’ State License Board (1965) 63 Cal.2d 598, 601 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 407 P.2d 865 ].)

Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control Board

225 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In Mandel v. … In Sklar v.

California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board

5 Cal. App. 4th 985 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1992

Background Petitioners brought this original proceeding for a writ of mandate compelling respondent California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to incorporate in the California Occupational Health and Safety … In Mandel v.

Purdue Frederick Co. v. State Board of Equalization

218 Cal. App. 3d 1021 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1990

The Board appeals. … Accordingly, the Board’s interpretation of section 6369 and regulation 1591, which is functionally identical to the statute, is subject to broad judicial review. (Wallace Berrie & Co. v.

McFarland Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

228 Cal. App. 3d 166 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1991

(Grimsley v. Board of Trustees (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 1440 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 85 ].) Such a disposition would violate the well-established principle that for every wrong there is a remedy. (Civ. Code, § 3523.) … (b); Grimsley v. Board of Trustees, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d 1440 ; Mt. San Antonio College Faculty Assn. v. Board of Trustees (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 27, 34-35 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 810 ]; San Diego Comm.

Framingham Acceptance Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

191 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1987

Where the Board has interpreted a statute which it is charged with enforcing its construction is entitled to great weight and respect unless shown to be clearly erroneous. (International Business Machines v. … (Santa FeTransp. v. State Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 531, 539 [ 334 P.2d 907 ]; Standard Oil Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1974) 39 Cal.App. 3d 765, 769 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 571 ].)

Montalvo v. Madera Unified School District Board of Education

21 Cal. App. 3d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1971

Rickelman (6th Cir. 1971) 441 F.2d 444 ; Stevenson v. Wheeler County Board of Education (S.D. Ga. 1969) 306 F.Supp. 97, 101 ; Jackson v. Dorrier, supra, 424 F.2d 213 ; Brick v. Board of Education, Sch. Dist. … (Goesaert v. Cleary (1948) 335 U.S. 464 [ 93 L.Ed. 163 , 69 S.Ct. 198 ]; Farrell v. Smith, supra, 310 F.Supp. 732, 737 ; Jackson v. Dorrier, supra, 424 F.2d 213, 218 ; Akin v. Board of Education of Riverside etc.

Robert G. Beloud, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

50 Cal. App. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1975

(Bentley v. Industrial Acc. Com., 75 Cal.App.2d 547, 550 [ 171 P.2d 532 ]; cf. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 [ 94 L.Ed. 865 , 872-873, 70 S.Ct. 652 ]; Adams v. … These statements of the Board recite some of the factors or criteria germane to a consideration of the value of an attorney’s service (Bentley v. Industrial Acc.