Case law

Yosemite Portland Cement Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

59 Cal. App. 2d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1943

Kubach Co. v. McGuire, 199 Cal. 215 [ 248 P. 676 ]; *43 Stern v. City Council of Berkeley, 25 Cal.App. 685 [ 145 P. 167 ]; Taylor v. Cole, 201 Cal. 327 [ 257 P. 40 ]; Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473 [ 279 P. 447 ].) … The board points to a statement appearing in Roth Drug, Inc., v.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2015

Filed 4/27/15 P. v. … No. 12F00019) JACORY BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.

General American Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

193 Cal. App. 3d 1175 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1987

(Statewide Homeowners, Inc. v. Williams (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 567, 569-570 , fn. omitted [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 479 ]; see generally San Gabriel Tribune v. … This is not a case where special deference is due because the board has promulgated rules (see Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v.

People v. Brown CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 2025

Filed 8/22/25 P. v. … (See, e.g., People v.

Scott v. Los Angeles Wholesalers Board of Trade

99 Cal. App. 73 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1929

Schutte & Koerting, Inc. v. Regional Water Quality Control Board

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2007

(c); Bixby v. Pierno, supra, 4 Cal.3d at pp. 137, 143-144; Kazensky v. City of Merced (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 44, 51-52 [ 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 356 ]; Mann v. … (Johnson v.

Tyra v. Board of Police & Fire Pension Commissioners

101 Cal. App. 2d 248 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1950

(Ahern v. S. H. Kress & Co., 97 Cal.App.2d 691, 692 [ 218 P.2d 108 ].) … (Fackrell v. City of San Diego, 26 Cal.2d 196, 207 [ 157 P.2d 625 , 158 A.L.R. 625 ]; Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co., 3 Cal.2d 427, 429 [ 45 P.2d 183 ].)

French Art Cleaners v. State Board of Dry Cleaners

91 Cal. App. 2d 890 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1949

In Kresge Co. v. … See, also, Nebbia v.

GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

1 Cal. App. 4th 827 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1991

(See United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co. (D.D.C. 1982) 552 F.Supp. 131 , affd. sub nom., Maryland v. United States (1983) 460 U.S. 1001 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 472 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 ].) … (Wienholz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1989) 217 Cal.App.3d 1501, 1505 [ 267 Cal.Rptr. 1 ], citations and internal quotation marks omitted; see also Evangelatos v.

Royal Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Control

99 Cal. App. 3d 788 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1979

(Ko ehn v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d 109, at p. 117 [ 333 P.2d 125 ].) Even more compelling is the fact the Board of Control need not review claims such as this at all. … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry, 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 602 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 512 ]; Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App.2d 543, 557 [ 314 P.2d 67 ].)

Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. v. Board of Pilot Com.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2015

(Board of Pilot Commissioners v. Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 581 (Pilot Commissioners).) … (Garcia v. Bellflower Unified School Dist. Governing Board, supra, 220 Cal.App.4th 4th at p. 1064.)

People v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

28 Cal. App. 2d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1938

In April, 1931, pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax Act (Stats, of 1923, p. 572), as amended by the Statutes of 1931, page 107, said Brown and Sullivan applied to the state board of equalization … (First Congregational Church of Christ v. Lowrey, 175 Cal. 124—126 [ 165 Pac. 440 ].)

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

46 Cal. App. 3d 104 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1975

Bd. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 588, 592 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 455 P.2d 822 ]; LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App. … Auto Stores v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 469, 476-477 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 575 , 482 P.2d 199 ]; Cedillo v. Workmen's Comp.

Funeral Directors Ass'n v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

67 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1944

Frederick v. City of San Luis Obispo, 118 Cal. 391, 396 [ P. 661]; Eby v. Board of School Trustees, 87 Cal. 166 [25 \ 240]; Hyatt v. Allen, 54 Cal. 353 ; Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors, 53 Cal. 389 ; Conn v. … Com. v.

Piano v. State ex rel. New Motor Vehicle Board

103 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1980

.’” *418 (Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Board, supra, 54 Cal.2d, at p. 529 .) In City & County of S. F. v. … In Jenner v.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. App. 3d 329 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1973

Workmen’s Appeals Board, 258 ACA 589 [ 258 Cal.App.2d 490 ( 65 Cal.Rptr. 835 )], and Fruehauf Corporation vs. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 252 ACA 600 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 718 ] .. . .” … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp App.

W. M. Lyles Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 3d 132 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1969

The appeals board denied reconsideration. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Orange County Employees' Ass'n v. Board of Administration

39 Cal. App. 3d 825 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1974

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … (Phillipson v. Board of Administration, supra, 3 Cal.3d 32, 45, fn. 13 .) *828 The board argues the change in eligibility requirements cuts off Candella’s pension, citing Amundsen v.

Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of Supervisors

210 Cal. App. 3d 1202 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1989

(See Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 101 Cal. 15, 24 .) In approving the agreement with USC, the Board was not performing that kind of function. … (Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 644, 652 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 620 ]; see also Quinchard v. Board of Trustees (1896) 113 Cal. 664, 671 [ 45 P. 856 ].)

California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control Board

90 Cal. App. 3d 816 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1979

(See, e.g., Tartar v. The Spring Creek Water and Mining Co. (1855) 5 Cal. 395—use of a water wheel to power a mill; Simons v. … (See Hunter v. United States (9th Cir. 1967) 388 F.2d 148 .) Although the concept or doctrine of appropriative rights to water was first recognized by the courts (e.g., Irwin v.