Case law

People v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 2025

Filed 9/24/25 P. v. … BA290213-01) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County) v. FREDERICO BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.

People v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2023

Filed 4/26/23 P. v. … (See also People v. Lamoureux (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 241, 263.)

Lay v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners

179 Cal. App. 356 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1960

Section 2174 was the subject of construction in the case of Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Calif., 31 Cal.2d 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ]. … It appears from this record that, in view of the provisions of section 2174 when applied to the record made before the board, the board was required to admit Doctor Lay to the examination.

Lewis-Westco & Co. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

136 Cal. App. 3d 829 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1982

Brown (1943) 317 U.S. 341 [ 87 L.Ed. 315 , 63 S.Ct. 307 ], or by reason of the application of the Twenty-first Amendment. (See Rice v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. … (California Liquor Dealers v. Midcal Aluminum, supra, 445 U.S. 97, 104, 106 [ 63 L.Ed.2d 233, 242, 243-244 ] [quoting Parker v. Brown, supra, 317 U.S. at p. 351 ( 87 L.Ed. at p. 326 )].)

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. App. 3d 812 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1969

(De Luna v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 199 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 421 ]; Miller v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 490 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 835 ].) … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 266 Cal.App.2d 196 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].)

Kading v. Willis

135 Cal. App. 2d 82 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1955

Willis therefore had no way of knowing whether a child rode on the running board from Kading’s to Brown’s, or whether one was still there when he stopped for the Brown delivery, but he was sure that all of them got off the … Although the boys were on the running board at Kading’s and had insisted on riding up to Brown’s, leaving the truck only *91 upon Willis’ command, and although David was so close when he came out of Brown’s that he ordered

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

245 Cal. App. 4th 1021 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2016

ADJ7167413, Petitioner, ADJ7167333) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD et al., Respondents. … Co. v. Industrial Accident Com. (1965) 63 Cal.2d 60, 62, fn. 1; Colonial Ins. Co. v. Industrial Accident Com. (1946) 29 Cal.2d 79, 82; see General Accident Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

208 Cal. App. 3d 914 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1989

(Nuelle v. Workers’ Comp. … (Taylor v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 95 Cal.App.3d 139 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 906 ].)

DuRoss v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2015

Filed 6/29/15 DuRoss v. … BROWN, JR., AS GOVERNOR, ETC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

People v. Brown CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 2025

Filed 8/18/25 P. v. … (People v. Brown (Nov. 3, 2020, B291733) opn. on rehg. [nonpub. opn.] 2020 WL 6439959.)

Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

203 Cal. App. 4th 739 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 2012

(Woods v. Superior Court (1981) 28 Cal.3d 668, 678 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 484 , 620 P.2d 1032 ]; see also Ocean Park Associates v. … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 445 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ].)

Anderson-Cottonwood Disposal Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

135 Cal. App. 3d 326 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1982

Since the employer is not a joint tortfeasor, Witt v. Jackson does not apply. (Ruiz, at pp. 469-470.) The board properly declined to apply Ruiz for it is no longer the law. … We assume arguendo the identical issue of employer negligence was presented in Webb’s civil action and the board proceedings. (See Jackson v.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

204 Cal. App. 4th 766 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2012

We therefore annul the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) and remand with instructions to deny Garcia’s claim for psychiatric injury. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The facts are not disputed. … Guarantee Assn. v. Workers’ Comp.

Schutte & Koerting, Inc. v. Regional Water Quality Control Board

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2007

(c); Bixby v. Pierno, supra, 4 Cal.3d at pp. 137, 143-144; Kazensky v. City of Merced (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 44, 51-52 [ 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 356 ]; Mann v. … (Johnson v.

Teichert Construction v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 833 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2006

Where, as here, we review the interpretation of a regulation by the board charged with enforcing the regulation, we must respect the subject matter expertise of the board. (Lusardi Construction Co. v. … (Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor Vehicles, supra, 32 Cal.3d at pp. 368-369.) In contrast, the Board’s interpretation of the regulation is reasonable.

3 Stonedeggs, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal · May 10, 2024

ADJ14015513) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD AND BRADEN NANEZ, Respondents. … In contrast, the Board in Norman v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1997) 62 Cal.Comp.Cases 87 [1997 Cal.Wrk.Comp.

Rich Vision Centers, Inc. v. Board of Medical Examiners

144 Cal. App. 3d 110 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1983

Deukmejian v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 150, 157 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 624 P.2d 1206 ].) … (Ibid.; D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 14-15 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

153 Cal. App. 4th 524 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 18, 2007

Guarantee Assn. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (Weitzman), 1 and California Ins. Guarantee Assn. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. … The arbitrator granted CIGA’s petition, but the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) granted reconsideration to SCIF.

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

46 Cal. App. 3d 104 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1975

Bd. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 588, 592 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 455 P.2d 822 ]; LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App. … Auto Stores v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 469, 476-477 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 575 , 482 P.2d 199 ]; Cedillo v. Workmen's Comp.

Funeral Directors Ass'n v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

67 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1944

Frederick v. City of San Luis Obispo, 118 Cal. 391, 396 [ P. 661]; Eby v. Board of School Trustees, 87 Cal. 166 [25 \ 240]; Hyatt v. Allen, 54 Cal. 353 ; Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors, 53 Cal. 389 ; Conn v. … Com. v.