Case law

Lin v. Board of Directors of PrimeCare Medical Network

California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2025

(Smith v. … Co. v.

Rowland School District v. State Board of Education

264 Cal. App. 2d 589 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1968

On August 18 defendant State Board of Education filed its “Return by Way of Demurrer of State Board of Education to Second Amended Complaint.” … We quote from McRae v.

Morro Hills Community Services District v. Board of Supervisors

78 Cal. App. 3d 765 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1978

Dist. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, at p. 72.) … The section clearly applies the substantial evidence standard of both LAFCO and the Board. The rule of Strumsky v.

San Diego Nursery Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

100 Cal. App. 3d 128 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1979

Board, 324 U.S. 793 [ 89 L.Ed. 1372 , 65 S.Ct. 982 ] and Labor Board v. … The foregoing considerations compel our disapproval of the Board’s efforts to proceed on an ad hoc “policy” basis to take unconsented access to the grower’s worksite. Judgment affirmed. Brown (Gerald), P. J., concurred.

Victor Valley Transit Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

83 Cal. App. 4th 1078 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2000

As a creature of the Legislature, the Board has no powers beyond those conferred on it. (State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1942) 20 Cal.2d 264, 266 [ 125 P.2d 42 ]; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Ind. Acc. … Co. v.

Pasha v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

174 Cal. App. 3d 439 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1985

(Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 31 Cal.3d 124, 135 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 732 , 642 P.2d 792 ].) We conclude that the record supports the trial court’s decision. A. Brisson’s Surgery Dr. … (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 198 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ].)

Wolfe v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

124 Cal. App. 3d 703 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1981

(Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819, 828 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ].) … (D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 17 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)

Citizens Against a New Jail v. Board of Supervisors

63 Cal. App. 3d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1976

Hite, 36 Cal.2d 125 [ 222 P.2d 225 ]; Mueller v. Brown, 221 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 474 ]). … Board of Supervisors, 176 Cal. 84 [ 167 P. 514 ] [overruled on other grounds in Simpson v. Hite, supra, at pp. 132-133 ]; see Burdick v.

Board of Education v. Oakland Education Ass'n

112 Cal. App. 3d 503 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1980

Thus, the governing board is not deprived of the power to grant leaves for “other periods of time” in addition to those expressly authorized. … (See Marrujo v. Hunt (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 972 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 220 ].).

Southern California Freight Lines v. State Board of Equalization

72 Cal. App. 2d 26 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1945

More nearly in point are such cases as Buick Motor Co. v. … As in Boessow v.

Babcock-Bucklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

156 Cal. App. 3d 135 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1984

(Webb v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 28 Cal.3d at p. 630, fn. 5 .) … Conclusion The decision of the Board is annulled and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. Franson, Acting P. J., and Hamlin, J., concurred. See Webb v. Workers' Comp.

Bar Master, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

65 Cal. App. 3d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1976

Bar Master, Inc. sued State Board of Equalization (Board) for a refund of use taxes paid by it pursuant to deficiency assessment by the Board following the Board’s denial of claim for refund. … See also Culligan Water Conditionings v.

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

7 Cal. App. 3d 126 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1970

Wallace & Associates, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 271 Cal.App.2d 589 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 749 ]) the appeals board reversed. … The order of the appeals board is annulled. The order of the department is reversed and the proceeding is remanded to the department for fixing of penalty in terms consistent with this opinion. Brown (H.

Dole Bakersfield, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

64 Cal. App. 4th 1273 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1998

(McCarthy v. … In Caesar’s Restaurant v. Ind. Acc.

McNeil's Inc. v. Contractors' State License Board

262 Cal. App. 2d 322 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1968

(Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, 544 [ 110 P.2d 992 ]; Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 229 Cal.App.2d 124, 135 .) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. The opinion in Lundborg v. Director of the Department of Professional etc.

Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors

127 Cal. App. 3d 644 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1982

As stated in People v. … This court concludes the procedures required by law were followed by the Board in designating trauma centers. (Gong v.

Water Users Ass'n v. Board of Directors

34 Cal. App. 3d 131 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1973

Bd. of Supervisors, 43 Cal.App.2d 351 [ 110 P.2d 1076 ]; Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist., 169 F.2d 312 ; May v. Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125 [ 208 P.2d 661 ]; May v. … The district’s board stopped levying assessments to raise bond service costs until forced to resume by a decision of the state Supreme Court in July 1949. (May v. Board of Directors, supra, 34 Cal.2d 125 .)

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

47 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1975

The board erred. … Brown (H. G), J., and Scótt, X, concurred.

Farmers Underwriters Ass'n v. Franchise Tax Board

242 Cal. App. 2d 589 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1966

Proc., § 1858; Burks v. Poppy Constr. Co., 57 Cal.2d 463, 470 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 370 P.2d 313 ].) … Proc., § 1858; Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

Lay v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners

179 Cal. App. 356 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1960

Section 2174 was the subject of construction in the case of Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Calif., 31 Cal.2d 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ]. … It appears from this record that, in view of the provisions of section 2174 when applied to the record made before the board, the board was required to admit Doctor Lay to the examination.