Case law

Narvaez v. Board of Police & Fire Commissioners

27 Cal. App. 791 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1915

For the reason stated in the decision filed this day in Humburg v. Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of San Jose et al., (Civ. No. 1313), ante, p. 6, [ 148 Pac. 802 ], the judgment is reversed.

Chaney v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement Board

61 Cal. App. 2d 701 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1943

(Isenberg v. Sherman (1932), 214 Cal. 722, 725 [ 7 P.2d 1006 ]; Durkee v. Garvey (1890), 84 Cal. 590, 591 [ 24 P. 929 ] ; Chapman v. St. … The opinion of this court in Chaney v. L. A. County etc. Retirement Board, 59 Cal.App.2d 413 , did not award respondent costs.

Brown v. Mansueto CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · May 8, 2026

Filed 5/7/26 Brown v. … BROWN, as Trustee, etc., Respondent, G066603 v. (Super. Ct.

Consani v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Safeway Stores, Inc.

227 Cal. App. 3d 12 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1991

Daniels v. Workmen’s Comp. … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp.

Heating Equipment Manufacturing Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

228 Cal. App. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1964

Franchise Tax Board (1962) 203 Cal.App.2d 458 [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 707 ]; Andersen-Carlson Mfg. Co. v. … Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, support such a uniform test.

Visalia School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

40 Cal. App. 4th 1211 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1995

(Klee v. Workers’ Comp. … In Boyd v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Bd. (1991) 56 Cal. Comp.Cases 219, the board approved a compromise and release on January 3, 1985.

Stockwell v. Barnum

7 Cal. App. 413 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1908

Brown and Bettina B. … (Bank v. Stone, 121 Cal. 208 , [ 53 Pac. 634 ].) The making of the sale was not such a corporate act as required formal action of the board of directors.

County of Del Norte v. City of Crescent City

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 179 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1999

Brown Act (Brown Act). (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) … It did not seek a ruling on the purported Brown Act violation. As a general matter a party must adhere on appeal to the theory on which the matter was tried. (Ernst v.

Social Services Union v. Alameda County Training & Employment Board

207 Cal. App. 3d 1458 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1989

Joint Board (1959) 52 Cal.2d 568, 589 [ 343 P.2d 23 ], the trial court compelled arbitration of controversies existing between a union and management. … We reject respondent’s contention that the remedy imposed by the arbitrator was in violation of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

133 Cal. App. 3d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1982

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denied reconsideration of the trial judge’s award of compensability. … Appeals Bd. (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 514, 518-520 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 605 ]; Murphy v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 996, 1002 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 561 ] (per Andreen, J., Brown, P.

Cummings v. California State Teachers' Retirement Board

241 Cal. App. 2d 149 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1966

(Abbott v. City of Los Angeles (1958) 50 Cal.2d 438, 447-455 [ 326 P.2d 484 ]; Allen v. City of Long Beach (1955) 45 Cal.2d 128, 131 [ 287 P.2d 765 ]; Kern v. … (Rose v. State of California (1942) 19 Cal.2d 713, 723-724 [ 123 P.2d 505 ]; and see Bilyeu v. State Employees’ Retirement System (1962) 58 Cal.2d 618, 626 [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 375 P.2d 442 ]; Martin v.

Shubat v. Sutter County Assessment Appeals Board No. 1

13 Cal. App. 4th 794 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1993

Code, § 201; County of Stanislaus v. … In County of Stanislaus v.

Aantex Pest Control Co. v. Structural Pest Control Board

108 Cal. App. 3d 696 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1980

Code, §§ 8647 and 8643), appellant board concluded—inter alia—that grounds for discipline existed resulting in the license revocation. … (Swars v. Council of City of Vallejo (1949) 33 Cal.2d 867, 871-872 [ 206 P.2d 355 ]; Savelli v.

People v. Brown CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 2026

Filed 4/3/26 P. v. … under People v.

State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Stevenson

5 Cal. App. 3d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1970

Bd. v. … Co. v. Neale (1891) 88 Cal. 50, 67 [ 25 P. 977 ]; County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal Dist. (1959) 175 Cal.App.2d 834, 836 [ 1 Cal. Rptr. 60 ] hear, den.; People ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Wks. v.

Martinez v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

206 Cal. App. 3d 1385 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1988

(Bunny’s Waffle Shop v. Cal. Emp. Com., supra, 24 Cal.2d at pp. 742-743.) … (See McKinley v. California Emp. etc. Com. (1949) 34 Cal.2d 239, 243 [ 209 P.2d 602 ].) California should adopt the reasoning of the court in Sunstar Foods, Inc. v.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

8 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1970

Co. v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 807 [ 159 P. 721 ].) … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1936) 12 Cal.App.2d 588, 596 [ 55 P.2d 911 ]; Pruitt v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd., supra.)

GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

1 Cal. App. 4th 827 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1991

(See United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co. (D.D.C. 1982) 552 F.Supp. 131 , affd. sub nom., Maryland v. United States (1983) 460 U.S. 1001 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 472 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 ].) … (Wienholz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1989) 217 Cal.App.3d 1501, 1505 [ 267 Cal.Rptr. 1 ], citations and internal quotation marks omitted; see also Evangelatos v.

General American Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

193 Cal. App. 3d 1175 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1987

(Statewide Homeowners, Inc. v. Williams (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 567, 569-570 , fn. omitted [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 479 ]; see generally San Gabriel Tribune v. … This is not a case where special deference is due because the board has promulgated rules (see Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v.

Royal Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Control

99 Cal. App. 3d 788 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1979

(Ko ehn v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d 109, at p. 117 [ 333 P.2d 125 ].) Even more compelling is the fact the Board of Control need not review claims such as this at all. … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry, 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 602 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 512 ]; Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App.2d 543, 557 [ 314 P.2d 67 ].)