Case law

Napa Union High School District v. Board of Supervisors

54 Cal. App. 326 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1921

(Gibson v. Board of Supervisors, 80 Cal. 359 , [ 22 Pac. 225 ].) … (Bernardo v. Rue, 26 Cal. *332 App. 108, [ 146 Pac. 79 ].)

Adamek & Dessert, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

178 Cal. App. 3d 970 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1986

(See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v. All Brand Printing Corp. (2d Cir. 1979) 594 F.2d 926, 929 ; Franks Bros. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1944) 321 U.S. 702, 705-706 [ 88 L.Ed. 1020, 1023-1024 , 64 S.Ct. 817 ].) … relies on Yamada Brothers v.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

8 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1970

Co. v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 807 [ 159 P. 721 ].) … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1936) 12 Cal.App.2d 588, 596 [ 55 P.2d 911 ]; Pruitt v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd., supra.)

Eisenberg's White House, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

72 Cal. App. 2d 8 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1945

In Weco-Products Co. v. … Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., 240 U.S. 342 [ 36 S.Ct. 370 , 60 L.Ed. 679 ], and Tanner v.

Caressa Camille, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 2002

Its decisions, however, are subject to administrative review by the board and a final order of the board is, in turn, subject to judicial review.” (Walsh v. … Co. v.

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

236 Cal. App. 2d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1965

Prom the leading ease of Campbell Soup Co. v. Board of Review etc. … (Campbell Soup Co. v. Board of Review etc. Dept. of Labor & Industry, supra, 100 A.2d 287, 289 ; Myerson v. Board of Review etc. Dept. of Labor & Industry, supra, 128 A.2d 15, 17 .)

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

99 Cal. App. 3d 647 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1979

These principles, when applied, require reconsideration by the Board. Guided by the teaching of Hale v. … Expert testimony is not conclusive upon the judge or the Board. The Board may and should consider all of the evidence tending to throw light on the issue. (Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

226 Cal. App. 3d 1288 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1991

(Yellow) and Golden Eagle Insurance Co. challenge a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) holding that Yellow was the employer, for workers’ compensation purposes, of applicant Richard Edwinson, a cabdriver … The Board denied reconsideration. Yellow and its compensation insurer brought this proceeding for a writ of review. 1 II.

Mercury Casualty Co. v. State Board of Equalization

141 Cal. App. 3d 43 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1983

The case replied on by the trial court and the board is not helpful. In Allstate Ins. Co. v. … The Supreme Court has, by its order of February 16, 1983, returned the case to us “for reconsideration in the light of Metropolitan Life v.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

26 Cal. App. 3d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1972

In Boyd v. … Kidder was followed in City of Palo Alto v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Gaudin) 232 Cal.App.2d 305, 313 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 822 ], Pennington v. Workmen’s Comp.

County of Nevada v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

223 Cal. App. 4th 579 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2014

ADJ8213231) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and DAVID LADE, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: Petition for writ of review. Decision annulled. … Relying on Johnson v.

Vial v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

75 Cal. App. 3d 997 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1977

Next, Brennan v. … Steel v. Occupational S. and H.

Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 2002

And Justice Brown opined that a single level of scrutiny—heightened scrutiny—applies in all regulatory takings cases. … (Hensler v. City of Glendale, supra, 8 Cal.4th atp. 16 .) The Board’s expertise is of no assistance here. Further, the Board is not likely to resolve the dispute in a manner that makes judicial review unnecessary.

State Employee's Retirement System v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

267 Cal. App. 2d 611 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1968

A referee of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board awarded the death benefit to the widow of June B. McNerney, finding that Mr. McNerney’s death was work-connected. The board denied reconsideration. … (Turner v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 442, 448-449 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 825 ]; Bussa v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 259 Cal.App.2d at pp. 265-266; see also State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Morro Hills Community Services District v. Board of Supervisors

78 Cal. App. 3d 765 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1978

Dist. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, at p. 72.) … The section clearly applies the substantial evidence standard of both LAFCO and the Board. The rule of Strumsky v.

San Diego Nursery Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

100 Cal. App. 3d 128 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1979

Board, 324 U.S. 793 [ 89 L.Ed. 1372 , 65 S.Ct. 982 ] and Labor Board v. … The foregoing considerations compel our disapproval of the Board’s efforts to proceed on an ad hoc “policy” basis to take unconsented access to the grower’s worksite. Judgment affirmed. Brown (Gerald), P. J., concurred.

Martinez v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

206 Cal. App. 3d 1385 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1988

(Id., pp. 1525-1526, citing Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board, supra, 59 Cal.2d 73 .) Whether a trade dispute exists depends on the facts of each case. (Isobe v. Unemployment Ins. … Appeals Board, supra, 59 Cal.2d 77 .)

California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

89 Cal. App. 4th 1201 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 2001

Under Labor Code section 5800, “[a]ll awards of the appeals board for compensation . . . shall carry interest at the same rate as judgments in civil actions . . . .” (Soto v. Workers’ Comp. … (See Moulton v. Workers ’ Comp.

Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Superior Court

73 Cal. App. 3d 860 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1977

. *862 Facts Petitioner, the Board of Medical Quality Assurance of the State of California (Board), filed an accusation against real party in interest Fred A. … The motion of Board for order that the deposition not be taken was heard June 27, 1977, and was denied the same day.

Water Users Ass'n v. Board of Directors

34 Cal. App. 3d 131 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1973

Bd. of Supervisors, 43 Cal.App.2d 351 [ 110 P.2d 1076 ]; Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist., 169 F.2d 312 ; May v. Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125 [ 208 P.2d 661 ]; May v. … The district’s board stopped levying assessments to raise bond service costs until forced to resume by a decision of the state Supreme Court in July 1949. (May v. Board of Directors, supra, 34 Cal.2d 125 .)