Case law

Daggett v. State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

44 Cal. App. 2d 742 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1941

(Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal. (2d) 534 [ 110 Pac. (2d) 992 ].) … This conclusion puts an end to our inquiry regarding the sufficiency of the evidence on the appeal (Drummey v.

Chico Unified School District v. Board of Supervisors

3 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1970

As stated in Butler v. Compton Jr. … See also Butler v. Compton Jr.

Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

60 Cal. App. 3d 283 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1976

The board *286 disallowed both refunds. Diamond agreed that any refund returned to it would be refunded to Crocker pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 6054.5 and Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. … State Board of Equalization, 58 Cal.2d 252 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 589 , 373 P.2d 637 ]. In reversing our decision, the United States Supreme Court reiterated the controlling nature of its 1968 decision in Agricultural Bank v.

Travis v. Board of Trustees of California State University

73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 854 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2008

(See Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988, 992 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 431 ] [Brown Act’s personnel exception includes the power to both consider and act in closed session].) … In Duval v.

West Foods, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

96 Cal. App. 3d 653 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1979

The Board then appealed to us. Since there is no conflict as to the facts and the only issue is the application of 1262, we are not bound by the trial court’s determination. (Shoban v. … (See Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board (1963) 59 Cal.2d 73 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 878 , 378 P.2d 102 ], for the rule that voluntaiy unemployment terminates benefit eligibility.)

State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Whitlow

243 Cal. App. 2d 490 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1966

People v. Peninsula Title Guar. … (People v.

Oduyale v. California State Board of Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal · Oct 15, 2019

(Cassidy v. … Given the Board's directive to make public safety paramount (see Griffiths v.

Co-Operative Junk Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners

38 Cal. App. 676 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1918

As authority for this rule, they rely upon such cases as Henry v. Barton, 107 Cal. 535 , [ 40 Pac. 798 ]. There a judgment was affirmed which awarded a writ of mandate requiring the issuance of a retail liquor license. … (Goytino v. McAleer, 4 Cal. App. 655 , [ 88 Pac. 991 ].)

General Motors Corp. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

253 Cal. App. 2d 540 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1967

(See Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308, 309 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Ashdown v. State of California, 135 Cal.App.2d 291, 299 [ 287 P.2d 176 ]; Administrative Mandamus (Cont. Ed. … J., and Brown (H.C.), J., concurred.

Santa Barbara Optical Co. v. State Board of Equalization

47 Cal. App. 3d 244 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1975

It also cites Bozaich v. … (Daar v. Yellow Cab Co., supra, at p. 704; Vasquez v.

Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2002

(Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc. (1985) 40 Cal.3d 488, 492, fn. 2 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 818 , 709 P.2d 837 ].) … (Cockerell v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. (1954) 42 Cal.2d 284, 291-292 [ 267 P.2d 16 ]; Sunburst Bank v. Executive Life Ins. Co. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1156, 1164 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 734 ].)

General Dynamics Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 907 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1999

This case involves the effect of a compromise and release signed by real party in interest, Florence V. … Relying on General Foundry Service v. Workers Comp.

Douglas Aircraft Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

180 Cal. App. 2d 636 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1960

(Myerson v. Board of Review, supra [N.J. App.Div.], 43 N.J. Super. 196 [ 128 A.2d 15 ]; Campbell Soup Co. v. Board of Review [N.J. Supreme Court], 13 N.J. 431 [ 100 A.2d 287 ]; Smith v. … Subsequently in Myerson v. Board of Review (N.J. App. Div.), supra, 43 N.J.

Touche Ross & Co. v. State Board of Equalization

203 Cal. App. 3d 1057 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1988

The Board invokes the rule that tax exemptions are to be strictly construed against the taxpayer. (Santa Fe Transp. v. State Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 531, 539 [ 334 P.2d 907 ]; Standard Oil Co. v. … (Ho tel Del Coronado Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 612, 619-620 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 456 ].)

City of Oakland v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

61 Cal. App. 3d 254 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1976

F. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 771 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 429 ]. … F. v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare Board

229 Cal. App. 2d 762 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1964

(County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare Board, 199 Cal.App.2d 468 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 573 ].) … Hearings were held before a referee of the board and the referee prepared a proposed decision which was later adopted by the board.

Johar v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 2022

v. … (Robles v. Employment Development Dept. (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1029, 1036; Robles v. Employment Development Dept. (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 530, 547, 549; Brown, supra, 20 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1114–1115.)

Savage Plumbing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

131 Cal. App. 3d 517 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1982

Neither Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 69 Cal.2d 399 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 678 , 445 P.2d 294 ], nor Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. In *525 dustrial Acc. … Thus, the Board was required to apportion liability for the cost of treatment between Wroten’s injuries. *526 Wroten’s reliance upon Zenith Insurance Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

164 Cal. App. 3d 526 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1985

State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 27 Cal.3d 277, 283-284 ; Horack v. Franchise Tax Board (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 363, 370 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; United States Steel Corp. v. … Co. v. California State Board of Equalization, supra, 137 Cal.App.2d 87 , 100: ‘. . .

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 568 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2007

As Echeverría acknowledges, in reviewing the Board’s decision, we must determine whether in view of the entire record substantial evidence supported the Board’s findings. (Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. … (Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 69 Cal.2d 399, 407 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 678 , 445 P.2d 294 ].) In this case, the Board read Dr.