Case law

Save Our Skyline v. Board of Permit Appeals

60 Cal. App. 3d 512 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1976

I, §§ 8, 14; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 23 Cal.2d 303, 323 .)” … Lindell Co. v.

California State Automobile Ass'n v. Franchise Tax Board

191 Cal. App. 3d 1253 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1987

Trimont Land Co. v. Truckee Sanitary Dist. (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 330, 354 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 568 ]; Union Oil Associates v. Johnson (1935) 2 Cal.2d 727, 735 [ 43 P.2d 291 , 98 A.L.R. 1499 .) … (Fuentes v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 1, 7 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 673 , 547 P.2d 449 ]; In re White (1969) 1 Cal.3d 207, 212 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 460 P.2d 980 ]; People v.

Northstar at Tahoe v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

42 Cal. App. 4th 1481 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1996

J., and Brown, J., concurred. 1 The bunkhouse rule predated Labor Code section 3352, subdivision (f), which was introduced as Senate Bill No. 548 in 1975. (See, e.g., Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. … Kaiser Steel Corp. (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 658, 661 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 497 ] [same].) 2 Since the Board’s decision is erroneous as a matter of law on the undisputed facts, we shall annul its decision. (See Perez v.

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors

41 Cal. App. 4th 1363 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1996

A county board of retirement does not act as an agent for the county, but as an independent entity established pursuant to CERL. (Traub v. … Guelfi v.

Brown v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

160 Cal. App. 2d 842 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1958

The appellant is Lúcele Brown, a sister of the predeceased wife of the testator and the respondent is Mildred Lucille Brown Popp, a niece of the said predeceased wife. … of Ohio, and nephews John Henry Brown of Ohio, Wendell Brown of Los Angeles and Morris Swan of Temple City, California, share and share alike.”

Land v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 2023

Land, in turn, partially appealed the new decision to the Board on the ground the ALJ had failed to award interest. The Board ruled that under American Federation of Labor v. Unemployment Ins. … The trial court denied Land’s motion for a supplemental writ and awarded interest directly, pursuant to AFL and Brown v. California Unemployment Ins.

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

73 Cal. App. 2d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1946

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the State Board of Equalization in a suit to recover taxes paid under protest. … (See, also, Flynn v. San Francisco, 18 Cal.2d 210 [ 115 P.2d 3 ] ; Edward Brown & Sons v. McColgan, 53 Cal. App.2d 504 [ 128 P.2d 186 ].)

Nestlé Ice Cream Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 340 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2007

The Board is without jurisdiction to grant an untimely petition. (Scott v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 979, 984 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 267 ].) … Even if we accord “great weight” to the Board’s application of the statutes governing the timing of a petition for reconsideration (see Rea v. Workers’ Comp.

Toyota of Visalia, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

188 Cal. App. 3d 872 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1987

*876 Opinion BROWN (G.A.), P. J. On petition of Toyota of Visalia, Inc. … State Personnel Bd. (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 904, 921 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 396 ]; Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 666-667 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].)

Morrison v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 453 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 2003

Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq., Brown Act.) discussed in part II below. 3 Schmitt v. City of Rialto (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 494, 500 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 788 ]. 4 Guymon v. … Zolin (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 147, 152 [ 51 Cal.Rptr.2d 420 ]. 7 Guymon v. Board of Accountancy, supra, 55 Cal.App.3d at page 1016 . 8 Yellen v.

Orange County Water District v. Public Employment Relations Board

8 Cal. App. 5th 52 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2017

V. … In Harris v.

Aetna Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

11 Cal. App. 4th 1207 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1992

The trial court entered judgment for respondent State Board of Equalization (the Board), from which Aetna appeals, contending that it was unlawfully taxed on premiums it never received. I. … Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1982) 32 Cal.3d 649 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 578 , 652 P.2d 426 ] (hereafter Metropolitan) controlled the case and entered judgment in favor of the Board. 1 II.

Action Trailer Sales, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

54 Cal. App. 3d 125 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1975

As was said in Henry’s Restaurants of Pomona, Inc. v. … ‘If reasonable minds may well be divided as to the wisdom of an administrative board’s action, its action is conclusive.’ (Rible v. Hughes, supra, at p. 445 .)”

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

145 Cal. App. 3d 480 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1983

As discussed by the Supreme Court in City of Torrance v. Workers’ Comp. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

70 Cal. App. 3d 457 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1977

Stores v. McColgan, supra, at p. 481; Superior Oil Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 406, 412 . . ..)” (Italics added.) … Thus, as to the Board, the determination excluding the net income from the other metals is the law of the case (Gore v. Bingaman, 20 Cal.2d 118, 122-124 [ 124 P.2d 17 ]; Pillsbury v.

City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control Board

191 Cal. App. 4th 156 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 2010

In County of Los Angeles v. … (Pronsolino v.

California State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. App. 4th 1819 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 1993

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) found no merit in either and denied the petition. We agree with the second theory, however. … At issue in Hoppmann v. Workers’ Comp.

California Licensed Foresters Ass'n v. State Board of Forestry

30 Cal. App. 4th 562 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1994

(Marini v. Municipal Court (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 829, 837 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 465 ].) The Board contends none of the prerequisites to an award of attorney fees is satisfied here. … (Henneberque v.

Department of Education v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

14 Cal. App. 4th 1348 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1993

Co. v. … (See Rumbaugh v. Workers’ Comp.

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

112 Cal. App. 4th 358 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2003

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) refused to give CIGA an $85,000 credit for the underinsured motorist benefits Mangum had received because it found “no statutory provision” for such a credit. … (See Orosco v.