Case law

Jey Lyang Yu v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 4th 286 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1992

(See, e.g., Tokaji v. State Board of Equalization (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 612, 615-616 [ 67 P.2d 1082 ]; Empire Vintage Co. v. Collins (1940) 40 Cal.App.2d 612, 617 [ 105 P.2d 391 ].) … State Board of Equalization (1953) 40 Cal.2d 772 [ 256 P.2d 1 ]; Kirby v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Board, supra, 7 Cal.3d 433 .)

Holland Furnace Co. v. State Board of Equalization

177 Cal. App. 2d 672 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1960

The petition for redetermination was considered and treated by the board as a claim for refund. … The Legislature has provided a means whereby this question can be decided and, if the board did err, the taxpayer can get back (that is, obtain a “refund”) whatever additional amount he may have paid by reason of the board

MCI Airsignal, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

1 Cal. App. 4th 1527 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1991

(See also City of Gilroy v. … In White v.

City of Sacramento v. State Water Resources Control Board

2 Cal. App. 4th 960 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1992

(Citizens Task Force on Sohio v. Board of Harbor Comrs. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 812, 814 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 591 P.2d 1236 ].) … (Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Com. v. Board of Trustees (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 274, 292 [ 152 Cal.Rptr. 585 ].) Upon reversal of the judgment, Connelly and SEHC are no longer prevailing parties. (See Bullock v.

California Farm Bureau Federation v. California Wildlife Conservation Board

49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 169 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2006

(Compare McQueen v. … Board of Directors (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1143-1147 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 439 ], [notice of exemption improperly used, incomplete and misleading] (McQueen), disapproved on other grounds in Western States Petroleum Assn. v.

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Exeter Packers, Inc.

184 Cal. App. 3d 483 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1986

(Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. v. … (See Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. v. Richard A.

Koop v. Structural Pest Control Board

276 Cal. App. 2d 249 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1969

(Tracy v. Contractors’ State License Board, 63 Cal.2d 598, 601 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 407 P.2d 865 ].) … See Imperial Termite Control, Inc. v.

California State Employees' Ass'n v. State Personnel Board

41 Cal. App. 4th 793 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1995

(California State Employees' Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 372, 377, 381-382 [ 223 Cal.Rptr. 826 ].) … (Hale v. Morgan (1978) 22 Cal.3d 388, 394 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 375 , 584 P.2d 512 ].)

Board of Fire Commissioners of the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District v. Board of Supervisors

144 Cal. App. 2d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1956

Board of Supervisors, supra. ) While the writ of certiorari is discretionary it will be granted where the board has exceeded its powers. (Birch v. Board of Supervisors, supra.) … (Marsh v. Superior Court, 88 Cal. 595 [ 26 P. 962 ]; Faulkner v.

Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

46 Cal. App. 3d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1975

(Marchica v. State Board of Equalization, 107 Cal.App.2d 501, 513 [ 237 P.2d 725 ].) Because the facts are undisputed, only the problem of applying the sales tax statute to the facts remains. (See King v. … (b); Banken v. State Board of Equalization, 79 Cal.App.2d *273 572 [ 180 P.2d 400 ]) and that amounts received from more than one source may be included in gross receipts (see Anders v.

Governing Board of Oakdale Union School District v. Seaman

28 Cal. App. 3d 77 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1972

(Board of Education v. Mathews, supra, 149 Cal.App.2d 265, 272 .) … (Board of Education v. Mathews, supra, 149 Cal.App.2d 265, 272 .) 1 See Bekiaris v. Board of Education, 6 Cal.3d 575, 588 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ].

California School Employees Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

144 Cal. App. 3d 392 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1983

(See, e.g., Board of Education v. Jack M. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 691, 697 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 566 P.2d 602 ]; Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854, 859 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 760 ].) … (Walker v. City of San Gabriel (1942) 20 Cal.2d 879, 881 [ 129 P.2d 349 , 142 A.L.R. 1383 ]; Layton v. Merit System Commission (1976) 60 Cal.App.3d 58, 67 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 318 ].)

City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control Board

38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 2006

V APA Requirements Lastly, the Cities contend the trial court erred by finding the Water Boards did not violate the APA. … (Pronsolino v.

Oakland Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

120 Cal. App. 3d 1007 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1981

B. (6th Cir. 1963) 325 F.2d 746 [ 2 A.L.R.3d 868 ], relying on National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Allison Co. (6th Cir. 1948) 165 F.2d 766 [ 3 A.L.R.2d 990 ]. … U., Local 425 v. N. L. R. B. (D.C.

Knudsen Dairy Products Co. v. State Board of Equalization

12 Cal. App. 3d 47 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1970

In People v. … In People v.

Applebaum v. Board of Directors of Barton Memorial Hospital

104 Cal. App. 3d 648 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1980

The factor most often considered destructive of administrative board impartiality is bias arising from pecuniary interests of board members. (See American Motors Sales Corp. v. … Board of Trustees (1964) 61 Cal.2d 93 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 194 , 389 P.2d 722 ]. But see Abrams v. Jones (1922) 35 Idaho 532 [ 207 P. 724 ]; State v. Kelly (1960) 145 W.Va. 70 [ 112 S.E.2d 641 ].)

Ford v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals Board

30 Cal. App. 3d 494 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1973

(Mills v. State Bar, 6 Cal.2d 565, 567 [ 58 P.2d 1273 ].) … (People v. Youngs, 23 Cal.App.3d 180, 188 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 101 ]; People v. Vickers, 8 Cal.3d 451, 458-461 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 305 , 503 P.2d 313 ]; see also, Morrissey v.

City of San Joaquin v. State Board of Equalization

9 Cal. App. 3d 365 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1970

The Board relies on Bell v. Bank of Perris, 52 Cal.App.2d 66 [ 125 P.2d 829 ], and General Elec. Co. v. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 111 Cal.App.2d 180 , the evidence that a turbine generator became a fixture upon installation was overwhelming.

San Joaquin County Employees' Ass'n v. County of San Joaquin

39 Cal. App. 3d 83 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 1974

(Mantzoros v. State Bd. of Equalization (1948) 87 Cal.App.2d 140 [ 196 P.2d 657 ]; 3 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (7th ed. 1960) p. 1825.) These opinions (23 Ops. … Entirely apart from the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the above-quoted constitutional and statutory grants of power do not carry with them any limitations of power so as to deprive the board of supervisors of

California School Boards Ass'n v. State Board of Education

191 Cal. App. 4th 530 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 2010

The State Board has authority to “fill up the *559 details” by defining the meaning of the phrase “substantially rent free” in section 47613. (Marshall v. … (See Weber, Lipshie & Co. v. Christian (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 645, 658-659 [ 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 677 ]; see also Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ].)