Case law

City of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

(Biggers v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 431, 435 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 628 ] (hereafter Biggers); Poliak v. Board of Psychology (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 342, 348 [ 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 866 ].) … Charles v. Workers’ Comp.

County of Tulare v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

170 Cal. App. 3d 1247 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1985

*1249 Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 69 Cal.2d at pp. 819-820.) In Hinojosa v. Workmen’s Comp.

Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2003

Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order. … Standard of Review An appellate court is not bound by the Board’s conclusions on questions of law. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp.

Stockton Kenworth, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

157 Cal. App. 3d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1984

(See Culligan Water Conditioning v. State Bd. of Equalization (1976) 17 Cal.3d 86, 92-93 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 550 P.2d 593 ]; Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. … It is equally established, *338 however, that a board or commission may not adopt rules “which abridge, enlarge, extend or modify the statute creating the right.” (Am. Distilling Co. v. St.

Schoenberg v. County of Los Angeles Assessment Appeals Board

179 Cal. App. 4th 1347 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 2009

The court relied on Little v. … Moore v.

Northwest Energetic Services, LLC v. California Franchise Tax Board

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 642 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 2008

(Weekes v. … Woosley v.

Pacific Western Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

136 Cal. App. 2d 794 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1955

Co. v. McColgan, 68 Cal.App.2d 48 [ 156 P.2d 81 ]. … The by-laws provided that board meetings and stockholders’ meetings were to be held at the New Jersey office.

Superior Care Facilities v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

27 Cal. App. 4th 1015 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1994

Com’n v. … Code, § 12970); the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, §§ 3514.5, 3563.3); Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Lab. Code, § 1160.3) and various other statutory provisions (Gov.

Alameda County Assistant Public Defenders Ass'n v. County of Alameda

33 Cal. App. 3d 825 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1973

In International Assn, of Fire Fighters v. … In Board v.

Chaney v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement Board

59 Cal. App. 2d 413 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1943

(Vanderbilt v. All Persons, 163 Cal. 507, 513 [ 126 P. 158 ]; O’Dea v. Cook, 176 Cal. 659, 662 [ 169 P. 366 ]; see also Sweesy v. Los Angeles etc., Retirement Board, 17 Cal.2d 356, 361 [ 110 P.2d 37 ].) … (See Sweesy v. Los Angeles etc., Retirement Board, supra, 161 et seq.)

Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. Contractors' State License Board

41 Cal. App. 4th 1592 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1996

(Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 518, 525 [ 262 Cal.Rptr. 803 ].) These questions of law are subject to independent review on appeal. (Board of Retirement v. … To determine whether rule 834(b) falls within Board’s delegated power, we must decide whether Board reasonably interpreted the legislative mandate. (Hartzell v.

Security-First National Bank v. Board of Supervisors

135 Cal. App. 208 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1933

In Garvin v. … v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

148 Cal. App. 2d 299 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1957

They cite Kirk v. … They also cite People v.

Citroen Cars Corp. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

107 Cal. App. 3d 945 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1980

out of their employment or its termination. 6 Such an interpretation of a vested right to receive payments ignores the discussion of this issue in Powell v. … Hereafter Appeals Board. Hereafter Claimants. Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, subdivision (c); Bixby v.

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

79 Cal. App. 3d 615 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1978

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, upon petitioner’s request for reconsideration of the findings and award, upheld the decision of the administrative law judge and cited Dowden v. Industrial Acc. … (Abron v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 232, 238 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 778 ].) In Dowden v. Industrial Acc.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

88 Cal. App. 3d 43 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1979

(Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 10 Cal.3d 222, 230 ; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 .)

City of Oakland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

271 Cal. App. 2d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1969

(Fraide) 63 Cal.2d 242 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 404 P.2d 801 ]; Stafford v. Los Angeles etc. Retirement Board, 42 Cal.2d 795 [ 270 P.2d 12 ]; Lyons v. Hoover, 41 Cal. 2d 145 [ 258 P.2d 4 ]; Healy v. Industrial Acc. … (See Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 55 Cal.2d 867 , 875 *560 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 513 , 362 P.2d 337 ].)

American Hospital Supply Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

169 Cal. App. 3d 1088 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1985

(Estate of Simpson (1954) 43 Cal.2d 594, 602 [ 275 P.2d 467 , 47 A.L.R.2d 991 ]; Sutter Hospital v. City of Sacramento (1952) 39 Cal.2d 33, 39 [ 244 P.2d 390 ]; Hotel Del Coronado Corp. v. … (International Business Machines v. State Bd. of Equalization (1980) 26 Cal. 3d 923, 930-931 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 782 , 609 P.2d 1 ]; Rivera v. City of Fresno (1971) 6 Cal.3d 132, 140 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 281 , 490 P.2d 793 ].)

Cozens v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals Board

52 Cal. App. 3d 21 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 1975

Lake v. Civil Service Commission (1975) 47 Cal.App.3d 224, 228 [ 120 Cal.Rptr. 452 ]; Wingfield v. … The Board must still exercise judicial discretion, as explained in Brown v.

Julian Volunteer Fire Co. Assn. v. Julian-Cuyamaca Fire etc. CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2021

Brown Act (Brown Act)) when its board of directors (Board) first voted to begin the dissolution process. (Gov. … (Brown v. State Personnel Board (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 1162.) LAFCO and County met their burden on this element. The prejudice is obvious from the record.