Case law

Newco Leasing, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

143 Cal. App. 3d 120 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1983

(Union League Club v. Johnson (1941) 18 Cal.2d 275 [115 P.2d425]; Market St. Ry. Co. v. Cal. St. Bd. Equal. (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 87 [ 290 P.2d 20 ].) … The ultimate resolution, however, of whether the Board has correctly interpreted the statutes and its regulations rests with the courts. (Culligan Water Conditioning v.

Department of Public Health v. Board of Supervisors

171 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1959

The answer to this contention, as stated in Town of Meredith v. State Board of Health, 94 N. H. 123 [ 48 A.2d 489, 496 ], is found in Willis v. Wilkins, 92 N. … (State Board of Health v. City of Greenville, 86 Ohio St. 1 [ 98 N.E. 1019 , 1023, Ann.Cas. 1913D 52].) And in Commonwealth v.

Cypress Insurance Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

266 Cal. App. 2d 196 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1968

Faced with this conflict, it was the duty of the board to choose from this mass of evidence that part which seemed most persuasive. (Foster v. Industrial Acc. Com., 136 Cal.App.2d 812 [ 289 P.2d 253 ].) … Our function is limited to a determination of whether there is substantial evidence, whether contradicted or not, to sustain the findings of the board. (Pacific Employers Ins. Group v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

National Convenience Stores v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

121 Cal. App. 3d 420 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1981

Such questions of fact shall include ultimate facts and the findings and conclusions of the appeals board.” … Such finding of course made it possible for the judge and the board to ignore the surveillance films and the force of our opinion in Sully-Miller Contracting v. Workers’ Comp.

J.C. Penney Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

175 Cal. App. 4th 818 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 2009

. *821 Penney), contend that respondent the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) erred in limiting a credit for overpayment of temporary disability indemnity. … (Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 159, 168 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 157 , 666 P.2d 14 ].)

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

248 Cal. App. 4th 349 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2016

413 [municipal code provision that board of permit appeals shall act within specified time held directory, not jurisdictional]; Board of Education v. … Pines v.

County of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1999

In Rhiner v. Workers’ Comp. … Code, § 664; People v. Frye (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1486 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 52 ]; People v. Young (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 171, 186 [ 278 Cal.Rptr. 784 ]) and that the Board considered the totality of the circumstances.

Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

28 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,430 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1981

Squarely in point is Chula Vista Electric Co. v. … Co. v. Cal. St. Bd. Equal. (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 87 [ 290 P.2d 20 ].

Cardinal Distributing Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

159 Cal. App. 3d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1984

(Labor Board v. Katz, supra, 369 U.S. at p. 748 [8 L.Ed.2d at pp. 238-239].) … See also Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, 379 U.S. at pp. 221-224 [13 L.Ed.2d at pp. 244-246], Stewart, J. conc.)

Owen v. Board of Directors of Rosicrucian Fellowship

173 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1959

In Rosicrucian Fellowship v. … In Dyer v.

Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Committee v. Board of Trustees

89 Cal. App. 3d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1979

(See Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Com’n [2d Cir. 1972] 455 F.2d 412 , 420, 421)” is a correct statement of the law but is not applicable to this proceeding. … (See Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 846 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 571 ]; see Ed. Code, § 90420.)

General Accident Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

47 Cal. App. 4th 1141 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1996

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Dental Insurance Consultants, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

1 Cal. App. 4th 343 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1991

(Mole-Richardson Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 889, 894 [ 269 Cal.Rptr. 662 ].) The taxpayer has the burden of showing the Board’s decision was incorrect. (Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. … II The Board argues that the businesses were not functionally integrated as that term was used in F. W. Woolworth Co. v.

City of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

(Biggers v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 431, 435 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 628 ] (hereafter Biggers); Poliak v. Board of Psychology (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 342, 348 [ 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 866 ].) … Charles v. Workers’ Comp.

Brown v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen

13 Cal. App. 537 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1910

Brown, disappeared in October, 1900, and had not been heard from for more than seven years when this action was brought.

County of Tulare v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

170 Cal. App. 3d 1247 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1985

*1249 Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 69 Cal.2d at pp. 819-820.) In Hinojosa v. Workmen’s Comp.

Alameda County Assistant Public Defenders Ass'n v. County of Alameda

33 Cal. App. 3d 825 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1973

In International Assn, of Fire Fighters v. … In Board v.

Southwest Research Institute v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 769 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 2000

(Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 943, 946 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 175 , *708 471 P.2d 975 ]; Empire Star Mines Co. v. Cal. Emp. … Co. v. Industrial Accident Board (1942) 63 Idaho 720 [ 126 P.2d 573, 577 ].) After receiving some training, Yingst worked without any direct supervision in the field.

California School Boards Ass'n v. State Board of Education

186 Cal. App. 4th 1298 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2010

Engelmann v. … (See, e.g., Grier v.

Pacific Western Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

136 Cal. App. 2d 794 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1955

Co. v. McColgan, 68 Cal.App.2d 48 [ 156 P.2d 81 ]. … The by-laws provided that board meetings and stockholders’ meetings were to be held at the New Jersey office.