Case law

Department of Public Health v. Board of Supervisors

171 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1959

The answer to this contention, as stated in Town of Meredith v. State Board of Health, 94 N. H. 123 [ 48 A.2d 489, 496 ], is found in Willis v. Wilkins, 92 N. … (State Board of Health v. City of Greenville, 86 Ohio St. 1 [ 98 N.E. 1019 , 1023, Ann.Cas. 1913D 52].) And in Commonwealth v.

National Convenience Stores v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

121 Cal. App. 3d 420 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1981

Such questions of fact shall include ultimate facts and the findings and conclusions of the appeals board.” … Such finding of course made it possible for the judge and the board to ignore the surveillance films and the force of our opinion in Sully-Miller Contracting v. Workers’ Comp.

Beard v. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

111 Cal. App. 559 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1931

portion of section 5 of the act relating to the requirement that the applicant “must have completed a full course of instruction in an embalming school of the Class A type as rated by the Conference of Embalmers examining .boards … A. 249, 77 Pac. 166 ] ; Arwine v. Board of Medical Examiners, 151 Cal. 499 [ 91 Pac. 319 ].)

Board of Trustees v. County of Santa Clara

86 Cal. App. 3d 79 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1978

Pearsall v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 311 Ill. 11 [ 142 N.E. 520 ] (lake); Wheaton College v. … In City of Chicago v.

Modesto Properties Co. v. State Water Rights Board

179 Cal. App. 2d 856 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1960

Chow v. … In the later case of Peabody v.

Fair Employment Practice Commission v. State Personnel Board

117 Cal. App. 3d 322 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1981

(Sierra Club v. City of Hayward * (Cal.App.); Realty Projects, Inc. v. Smith (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 204, 213 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 71 ].) … (Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 551 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Stationary Engineers, Local 39 v. San Juan Suburban Water District

90 Cal. App. 3d 796 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1979

Labor Board (1956) 350 U.S. 270 [ 100 L.Ed. 309 , 76 S.Ct. 349 ]; NLRB v. International Van Lines (1972) 409 U.S. 48 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 201 , 93 S.Ct. 74 ]; N.L.R.B. v. … This shows no lack of good faith since the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act does not so require, but only that the “ultimate determinations are to be made by the governing body itself. . . .” (See Bagley v.

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

91 Cal. App. 3d 493 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1979

We conclude that neither of these two differences prevents the board from equitably apportioning the attorneys fee. … “No release of liability or compromise agreement is valid unless approved by the appeals board or referee." (§ 5001.)

County of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1999

In Rhiner v. Workers’ Comp. … Code, § 664; People v. Frye (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1486 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 52 ]; People v. Young (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 171, 186 [ 278 Cal.Rptr. 784 ]) and that the Board considered the totality of the circumstances.

Arenas v. San Diego County Board of Supervisors

112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 845 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 2001

(Nelson v. Board of Supervisors (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 25, 31 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 305 ].) … (Bernhardt v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 806, 811 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 189 ] [§ 17001 does not permit local exclusion from reach of § 17000].) Disposition The judgment is affirmed. Kremer, P.

Cardinal Distributing Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

159 Cal. App. 3d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1984

(Labor Board v. Katz, supra, 369 U.S. at p. 748 [8 L.Ed.2d at pp. 238-239].) … See also Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, 379 U.S. at pp. 221-224 [13 L.Ed.2d at pp. 244-246], Stewart, J. conc.)

F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

160 Cal. App. 3d 1154 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1984

It was stipulated that the board of directors of Woolworth U.S. … Wool *1160 worth Co. v. Taxation & Revenue Dept. (1982) 458 U.S. 354 [ 73 L.Ed.2d 819 , 102 S.Ct. 3128 ].

Adler v. City Council

184 Cal. App. 2d 763 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1960

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 200 Okla. 285 [ 193 P.2d 291 ]; Ford v. City of Hutchinson, 140 Kan. 307 [ 37 P.2d 39 ]). We think Turk v. … City of Los Angeles, 198 Cal. 308, 326 [ 245 P. 164 ]; Brougher v. Board of Public Works, 205 Cal. 426, 438-439 [ 271 P. 487 ]; Sacramento Paving Co. v.

San Diego Housing Commission v. Public Employment Relations Board

246 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2016

The Public Employment Relations Board (Board) is a quasi- judicial administrative agency modeled after the National Labor Relations Board and administers the Act. (County of Los Angeles v. … The Legislature presumably knew of the Board's practice when it passed AB 646 in 2011.9 (Moore v.

City of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

(Biggers v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 431, 435 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 628 ] (hereafter Biggers); Poliak v. Board of Psychology (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 342, 348 [ 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 866 ].) … Charles v. Workers’ Comp.

Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees

154 Cal. App. 2d 560 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1957

University Board of Trustees, Stanford Uni *564 versity Hospitals, 2 and Dr. Frank Gerbode. The trial court reduced the award to $213,355. … See Dees v.

Capitol Records, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

158 Cal. App. 3d 582 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1984

(Hall v. Franchise Tax Board (1966) 244 Cal.App.2d 843, 848 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 597 ].)” (Honeywell, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 739, 744 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 479 ]; see. Paine v. … State Board of Equal., 189 Cal.App.2d 504 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 421 ]; Abrams v.

Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2003

Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order. … Standard of Review An appellate court is not bound by the Board’s conclusions on questions of law. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp.

County of Tulare v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

170 Cal. App. 3d 1247 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1985

*1249 Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 69 Cal.2d at pp. 819-820.) In Hinojosa v. Workmen’s Comp.

Larson v. Board of Police and Fire Pension Commissioners

71 Cal. App. 2d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1945

Board of Pension Commissioners (1942), 21 Cal.2d 386 [ 132 P.2d 198 ]; Gibson v. City of San Diego (1945), 25 Cal.2d 930 [ 156 P.2d 737 ].) … (Dryden v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1936), 6 Cal.2d 575 [ 59 P.2d 104 ]; Snyder v. City of Alameda (1943), 58 Cal.App.2d 517 [ 136 P.2d 857 ].)