Case law

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

232 Cal. App. 4th 543 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2014

Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal.4th 593, 610 [ 160 Cal.Rptr.3d 387 , 304 P.3d 1052 ]; see Robert L. v. … (Tapia v.

Hand Rehabilitation Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

34 Cal. App. 4th 1204 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1995

Hand Rehabilitation Center (HRC) and Theodore Hylwa, M.D., petitioned for a writ of review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying their lien claims for medical *1208 costs. … In Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp.

Champion Motorcycles, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

200 Cal. App. 3d 819 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1988

(Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28, 34-35 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 805 , 520 P.2d 29 ].) The Board is of legislative origin. (BMW of North America Inc. v. … The Board cites a number of cases for the proposition that estoppel may be asserted against governmental entities in administrative cases. (Fredrichsen v.

Sonoma State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 2006

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) upheld the decision of the WCJ. … (Oden v. Board of Administration (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 194, 201 [ 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 388 ].)

National Lead Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

251 Cal. App. 2d 673 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1967

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 115 Cal.App.2d 684, 690 [ 252 P.2d 649 ], Under this rule, the board found an estoppel here. … Salsman, J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

Floystrup v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board

219 Cal. App. 3d 1309 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1990

Rent Stabilization Board v. … (McWilliams v. Holton (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 447, 451 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 574 ].) As succinctly stated in Harm v.

Mosser Companies v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

233 Cal. App. 4th 505 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 2015

(Sierra Club v. Superior Court, supra, 57 Cal.4th at p. 166.) … (Elsner v. Uveges (2004) 34 Cal.4th 915, 934, fn. 19.)

Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 587 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2005

We find some instruction in the Board case of Norman v. Workers’ Comp. … The Board’s interpretation of statutes it is charged with applying is entitled to respect. (Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

People v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 2016

Filed 4/21/16 P. v. … VCF282661) v. KRISTIE LYNN BROWN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

Cooley v. State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

141 Cal. App. 2d 293 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1956

Superior Court, 178 Cal. 369, 373 [ 173 P. 588 ] ; Bartlett Frazier Co. v. Hyde, 65 F.2d 350, 352 ; Karr v. Baldwin, 57 F.2d 252, 255 ; Bowles v. … (Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners, 93 Cal.App. 65, 69 [ 268 P. 1073 ] ; Minaker v. Adams, 55 Cal.App. 374, 377 [ 203 P. 806 ].)

Signature Fruit Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 878 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2006

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … (Nabors v. Workers’ Comp.

Tetra Pak, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

234 Cal. App. 3d 1751 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1991

The Board attacks these factual determinations. (See Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co. (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 526, 536 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 278 ] [existence of agency]; Siva v. … Phillips v.

Board of Trustees v. County of Santa Clara

86 Cal. App. 3d 79 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1978

Pearsall v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 311 Ill. 11 [ 142 N.E. 520 ] (lake); Wheaton College v. … In City of Chicago v.

Chrysler Corp. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

199 Cal. App. 2d 683 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1962

Prentice v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review, 161 Pa. Super. 630 [ 56 A.2d 295 ], interprets a Pennsylvania statute similar to the California Act. … But without regard to these factors, the broad application of the rule of agency found in Prentice v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review, 161 Pa.

Hoogasian Flowers, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

23 Cal. App. 4th 1264 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1994

(San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 579 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … (E.g., San Francisco Taypayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 2 Cal.4th 571, 579-580 ; Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 802-803 [ 268 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 789 P.2d 934 ]; Carman v.

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

91 Cal. App. 3d 493 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1979

We conclude that neither of these two differences prevents the board from equitably apportioning the attorneys fee. … “No release of liability or compromise agreement is valid unless approved by the appeals board or referee." (§ 5001.)

Fujitsu IT Holdings, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 473 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 2004

(Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 775 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 624 , 952 P.2d 641 ].) … (Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board (1970) 3 Cal.3d 745, 749-750 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 616 , 478 P.2d 48 ].)

Board of Trustees v. City of Los Angeles

49 Cal. App. 3d 45 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1975

The board appeals. … That case was subsequently disapproved in a case relied on heavily by the board (Hall v.

Permanente Medical Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

171 Cal. App. 3d 1171 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1985

We therefore reverse the Board’s opinion and order. … (See Campbell v. Graham-Armstrong, supra, 9 Cal.3d at p. 490, followed in Elkins v. Derby, supra, 12 Cal.3d at p. 414.) 7 Kaiser’s evidence before the Board on this issue was manifestly insufficient.

Meeks Building Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

207 Cal. App. 4th 219 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 2012

Najjar petitioned the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) for reconsideration of the decision, contending the WCJ had misconstrued section 4656, subdivision (c)(1)’s limitations period. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.