Case law

Department of Justice v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

213 Cal. App. 3d 194 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1989

Where the Board’s order determines a threshold issue, it is subject to appellate review. (Travelers Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. … Thus, under this benefit scheme, the PERS Board, not the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, determines eligibility. (Adduddell v.

Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

42 Cal. App. 4th 1260 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1996

Disposition In Ameri-Medical Corp. et al. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No. … Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No. LBO 218124. Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No.

Hand Rehabilitation Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

34 Cal. App. 4th 1204 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1995

Hand Rehabilitation Center (HRC) and Theodore Hylwa, M.D., petitioned for a writ of review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying their lien claims for medical *1208 costs. … In Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp.

Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

232 Cal. App. 2d 91 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1965

(General Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 111 Cal.App.2d 180 [244 P.2d 427]; Overly Mfg. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 191 Cal.App.2d 20, 30 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 391 ].) … (See e.g., Union Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 60 Cal.2d 441, 446 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ].)

Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

145 Cal. App. 2d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1956

(See Fullerton Oil Co. v. Johnson, 2 Cal.2d 162, 175 [ 39 P.2d 796 ].) … (Spring Valley Co. v. Johnson, 7 Cal.App.2d 258, 261 [ 46 P.2d 294 ]; Carpenter v. Peoples Mutual Life Ins. Co., 10 Cal.2d 299, 303 [ 74 P.2d 508 ].)

Chambers v. Board of Supervisors of Tehama County

57 Cal. App. 401 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1922

(Imperial Water Co. v. Supervisors, 162 Cal. 14 [ 120 Pac. 780 ].) … (Inglin v. Roppin, 156 Cal. 483 [ 105 Pac. 582 ]; Harelson v. South San Joaquin Irr. Dist., 20 Cal. App. 324 [ 128 Pac. 1010 ].)

Duarte & Witting, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 501 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2002

Stewart v. … V.

Sonoma State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 2006

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) upheld the decision of the WCJ. … (Oden v. Board of Administration (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 194, 201 [ 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 388 ].)

Americana Termite Co. v. Structural Pest Control Board

199 Cal. App. 3d 228 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1988

(Bib’le v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1980) 26 Cal.3d 548, 555 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 426 , 606 P.2d 733 ], quoting D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal. 3d 1, 17 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) … Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 392, 410 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 183 , 546 P.2d 687 ].)

San Francisco Fire Fighters v. Board of Supervisors

96 Cal. App. 3d 538 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1979

Instead of curtailing, or abridging, or hampering, the related charter provisions, the MeyersMilias-Brown Act was found to be in aid of them. (See People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., supra, 42 Cal.2d 621, 637 ; Brown v. … (State Board of Education v. Levit, 52 Cal.2d 441, 461 [ 343 P.2d 8 ]; Santa Clara County v. Superior Court, 33 Cal.2d 552, 554 [ 203 P.2d 1 ]; Blanchard v. Hartwell, 131 Cal. 263, 266-267 [ 63 P. 349 ]; Garver v.

People v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 2016

Filed 4/1/16 P. v. … (People v. Clark (2011) 52 Cal.4th 856, 931.)

Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax Board

179 Cal. App. 2d 591 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1960

These cases are Burnham v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 172 Cal.App.2d 438 and Clemens v. Franchise Tax Board (1959), 172 Cal. … The court then distinguished Henley V. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 122 Cal.App.2d 1 , and Burgess v. State, 71 Cal.

Breedlove v. Breedlove

161 Cal. App. 2d 712 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1958

(De Cou v. Howell, 190 Cal. 741, 751 [ 214 P. 444 ].) In Neblett v. … Co. v. Clarita etc.

Stokes v. California Horse Racing Board

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 792 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 2002

Stokes was charged with violating several rules of the California Horse Racing Board (Board). … Moreover, the Board’s interpretation of its own rules is entitled to deference. (See Los Angeles v.

Sonoma Subaru, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

189 Cal. App. 3d 13 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1987

(See Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) Nor can we graft a “good cause” exception onto the 10-day time limit for another reason. … (American Isuzu, supra, at p. 474; Carmel Valley View, Ltd. v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 817, 820 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 249 ].)

Champion Motorcycles, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

200 Cal. App. 3d 819 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1988

(Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28, 34-35 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 805 , 520 P.2d 29 ].) The Board is of legislative origin. (BMW of North America Inc. v. … The Board cites a number of cases for the proposition that estoppel may be asserted against governmental entities in administrative cases. (Fredrichsen v.

San Diego Union v. City Council

146 Cal. App. 3d 947 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 7, 1983

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; California Teachers Assn. v. … (Joiner v. City of Sebastopol (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 799, 804-805 [ 178 Cal.Rptr. 299 ]; Henderson v. Board of Education (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 875, 883 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 568 ]; Worthington v. Unemployment Ins.

Chrysler Corp. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

199 Cal. App. 2d 683 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1962

Prentice v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review, 161 Pa. Super. 630 [ 56 A.2d 295 ], interprets a Pennsylvania statute similar to the California Act. … But without regard to these factors, the broad application of the rule of agency found in Prentice v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review, 161 Pa.

Hoogasian Flowers, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

23 Cal. App. 4th 1264 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1994

(San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 579 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … (E.g., San Francisco Taypayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 2 Cal.4th 571, 579-580 ; Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 802-803 [ 268 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 789 P.2d 934 ]; Carman v.

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

232 Cal. App. 4th 543 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2014

Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal.4th 593, 610 [ 160 Cal.Rptr.3d 387 , 304 P.3d 1052 ]; see Robert L. v. … (Tapia v.