Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.71s

  • Sacramento Newspaper Guild Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors

    255 Cal. App. 2d 51 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 1967

    The injunction was sought to enforce the Brown Act (Gov. … (Myers v. English, 9 Cal. 341, 349 .) The statutory policy announced in the Brown Act is not to be thwarted by closed sessions whose sole excuse is that a lawsuit exists.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bell v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA CTY.

    23 Cal. App. 4th 1695 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1994

    (Mooney v. Pickett, supra, 4 Cal.3d at p. 679; accord, Whitfield v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 227 Cal.App.3d 451, 457 .) … A petition for a rehearing was denied May 2, 1994. 1 Respondents are petitioners in three cases consolidated by the superior court: Bell v. Board of Supervisors, Beal v. Board of Supervisors, and Burks v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United Teachers of Ukiah v. Board of Education

    201 Cal. App. 3d 632 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1988

    Similarly, Mayer v. Board of Trustees, supra, 106 Cal.App.3d 476 , provides no support for appellants’ hiring practices. … We of course recognize that a board may impose a uniform salary cut on all teachers within a particular rating. (Aebli, supra, 62 Cal.App.2d at p. 758 .) Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    40 Cal. App. 3d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1974

    (Brown v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 20 Cal.App.3d 903 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 96 ].) … (See *409 Brown v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra.) Where the employer is liable for all or a portion of the disability, the Fund is not also liable. (Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of Los Angeles v. Board of Supervisors

    108 Cal. App. 655 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1930

    Co. v. … In State Land Settlement Board v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court

    15 Cal. App. 4th 749 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1993

    In Labor Board v. … The ALRB has the authority to seek compliance from the primary wrongdoer, its alter ego, successors or assigns, (see Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board (1945) 324 U.S. 9, 14-15 [ 89 L.Ed. 661, 666-667 , 65 S.Ct. 478 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Overly Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    191 Cal. App. 2d 20 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1961

    (Everly v. Creech, 139 Cal.App.2d 651, 657 [ 294 P.2d 109 ]; Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.

    137 Cal. App. 414 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1934

    This is a companion case to Jenkins v. Board of Civil Service Commission, (Civil No. 9356) ante, p. 410 [ 30 P.2d 606 ], the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2024

    Filed 11/25/24 P. v. … Brown (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1361 (Brown I); People v. Brown (July 21, 1991, F013833) [nonpub. opn.] (Brown II); and People v. Brown (June 14, 1993, F017595) [nonpub. opn.] (Brown III).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ukegawa Brothers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    212 Cal. App. 3d 1314 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1989

    (Minifie v. Rowley, 187 Cal. 481, 487 [ 202 Pac. 673 ].) … In the case of Clark v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • San Francisco Fire Fighters v. Board of Supervisors

    96 Cal. App. 3d 538 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1979

    Instead of curtailing, or abridging, or hampering, the related charter provisions, the MeyersMilias-Brown Act was found to be in aid of them. (See People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., supra, 42 Cal.2d 621, 637 ; Brown v. … (State Board of Education v. Levit, 52 Cal.2d 441, 461 [ 343 P.2d 8 ]; Santa Clara County v. Superior Court, 33 Cal.2d 552, 554 [ 203 P.2d 1 ]; Blanchard v. Hartwell, 131 Cal. 263, 266-267 [ 63 P. 349 ]; Garver v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Governing Board of Nicasio School District v. Brennan

    18 Cal. App. 3d 396 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1971

    Appellate has cited Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, 68 Cal. 2d 67 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]. … (See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 [ 20 L.Ed. 2d 811 , 88 S.Ct 1731 ].)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of Anaheim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    128 Cal. App. 3d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1982

    Code, § 5908.5; Goytia v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Johnson v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 964, 973 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 202 , 471 P.2d 1002 ], quoting from Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

    34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 874 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 2005

    (Jim Beam) appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) in a tax refund action. … (Hoechst Celanese Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Abatti Produce, Inc.

    168 Cal. App. 3d 504 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1985

    Brown (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 69 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 598 ].) In California Coastal Farms, Inc. v. … Brown (Gerald), P.

    Disapproved in part by Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc., 43 Cal. 3d 696 (1987)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    42 Cal. App. 4th 1260 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1996

    Disposition In Ameri-Medical Corp. et al. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No. … Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No. LBO 218124. Ameri-Medical Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, WCAB No.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Stokes v. California Horse Racing Board

    119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 792 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 2002

    Stokes was charged with violating several rules of the California Horse Racing Board (Board). … Moreover, the Board’s interpretation of its own rules is entitled to deference. (See Los Angeles v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

    25 Cal. App. 3d 331 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1972

    We delineated the scope of our review in this regard in Covert v. … (Calhoun v. Superior Court, 46 Cal.2d 18, 31 [ 291 P.2d 474 ]; Lorenson v. Superior Court, 35 Cal.2d 49, 59-61 [ 216 P.2d 859 ]; People v. Rehman, 253 Cal.App.2d 119, 150-154 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 65 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    178 Cal. App. 3d 1016 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1986

    Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … The Board agreed. When an administrative body construes a statute, we take as our guide the principle we enunciated in People ex. rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

    145 Cal. App. 2d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1956

    (See Fullerton Oil Co. v. Johnson, 2 Cal.2d 162, 175 [ 39 P.2d 796 ].) … (Spring Valley Co. v. Johnson, 7 Cal.App.2d 258, 261 [ 46 P.2d 294 ]; Carpenter v. Peoples Mutual Life Ins. Co., 10 Cal.2d 299, 303 [ 74 P.2d 508 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.