Case law

City of Commerce v. State Board of Equalization

205 Cal. App. 2d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1962

The State Board and the County take the position that the City did not contract with the State Board until February 15, 1960, and in any event, under the provisions of article V, paragraph B, of the sales tax contract, the … (State Board of Education v. Levit, 52 Cal.2d 441, 458 [ 343 P.2d 8 ].)

California Teachers Assn. v. Board of Trustees

132 Cal. App. 3d 32 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1982

In Degener v. … (Rutherford v. Board of Trustees, supra, 64 Cal.App.3d 167, 178-179 .)

Cal-Metal Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

161 Cal. App. 3d 759 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1984

The Board determined the amount of sale subject to taxation was $1,056,070, as to which the Board imposed a tax of $62,814.24 plus interest in the amount of $6,132.93. 1 *763 On February 10, 1981, the Board issued a notice … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization (1959) 51 Cal. 2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; King v. State Bd. of Equalization (1972) 22 Cal.App.3d 1006, 1012 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 802 ].)

Wang v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

225 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1990

Wang appealed the ALJ’s decision to the Board. … (Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1980) 26 Cal.3d 770, 782 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 619 , 608 P.2d 707 ]; Lacy v. California Unemployment Ins.

Kilpatrick's Bakeries, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

77 Cal. App. 3d 539 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1978

Thus, the Inyo case is not nearly so persuasive as subsequent cases dealing with board decisions. The respondents also rely on Sierra Club v. … (Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 65 Cal.App.3d 723 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 588 ].)

General Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization

111 Cal. App. 2d 180 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1952

Co. v. Barber Asphalt Pav. … (American Optical Co. v. Nudelman, 370 Ill. 627 [ 19 N.E.2d 582 ].) California specifically refused to follow the Illinois rule in Kamp v.

Mashburn v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

132 Cal. App. 2d 126 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1955

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) *134 Appellant relies upon Aetna Bldg. Maintenance Co., Inc. v. … (See also Daggett v. State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 44 Cal.App. 2d 742 [ 112 P.2d 956 ].)

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 708 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2005

The district attorney had conducted an investigation into whether the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors (Board) violated the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) … . *1107 Register Div. of Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v.

Henry H. v. Board of Pension Commissioners

149 Cal. App. 3d 965 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1983

State Board of Edu *976 cation (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ] [school teacher]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 68 Cal.2d 67 [medical doctor]; Hallinan v. … (See, e.g., Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d at pp. 220-229; Board of Education v. Jack M. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 691, 696-697 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 566 P.2d 602 ], and cases cited at p. 702, fn. 6.)

Frito Co. v. State Board of Equalization

192 Cal. App. 2d 331 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1961

Another auditor for defendant board testified, as follows: He audited plaintiff’s books and records. … ‘Transfer of possession’ . . . includes only transactions found by the board to be in lieu of a transfer of title, exchange, or barter.”

American Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education

77 Cal. App. 3d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1977

Appellants, relying on Kamin v. Governing Board, 72 Cal.App.3d 1014 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 853 ], contend that this part of the holding should be affirmed. … Appellants rely on Coffey v.

RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

246 Cal. App. 2d 812 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1966

(Superior Oil Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal. 2d 406 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 545 , 386 P.2d 33 ]; see also Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 417, 425 [ 34 Cal. … (See Richfield Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 169 Cal.App.2d 331, 337 [ 337 P.2d 237 ].)

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

149 Cal. App. 3d 571 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1983

The issue is whether the board properly applied the standard set forth in former subdivision (h) of Labor Code section 3600. 1 *574 In Ezzy v. Workers’ Comp. … (Ezzy v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 146 Cal.App.3d at p. 260 .)

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

40 Cal. App. 3d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1974

(Brown v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 20 Cal.App.3d 903 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 96 ].) … (See *409 Brown v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra.) Where the employer is liable for all or a portion of the disability, the Fund is not also liable. (Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp.

Applied Materials v. Workers' Comp Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 2021

ADJ1351389) Petitioners, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and D.C., Respondents. … ADJ7168611, Petitioner, ADJ7183596) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and D.C., Respondents.

Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

232 Cal. App. 2d 91 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1965

(General Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 111 Cal.App.2d 180 [244 P.2d 427]; Overly Mfg. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 191 Cal.App.2d 20, 30 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 391 ].) … (See e.g., Union Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 60 Cal.2d 441, 446 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ].)

Chambers v. Board of Supervisors of Tehama County

57 Cal. App. 401 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1922

(Imperial Water Co. v. Supervisors, 162 Cal. 14 [ 120 Pac. 780 ].) … (Inglin v. Roppin, 156 Cal. 483 [ 105 Pac. 582 ]; Harelson v. South San Joaquin Irr. Dist., 20 Cal. App. 324 [ 128 Pac. 1010 ].)

Ukegawa Brothers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

212 Cal. App. 3d 1314 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1989

(Minifie v. Rowley, 187 Cal. 481, 487 [ 202 Pac. 673 ].) … In the case of Clark v.

Do It Urself Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & Berns

7 Cal. App. 4th 27 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 1992

Rosenthal (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 96, 114 [ 260 Cal.Rptr. 369 ]; Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 771 , 789 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 499 ]; Weil & Brown, Cal. … (Barnes v. Blue Haven Pools (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 123, 127 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 444 ]; see also Weil & Brown, Cal.

Sacramento Newspaper Guild Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors

255 Cal. App. 2d 51 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 1967

The injunction was sought to enforce the Brown Act (Gov. … (Myers v. English, 9 Cal. 341, 349 .) The statutory policy announced in the Brown Act is not to be thwarted by closed sessions whose sole excuse is that a lawsuit exists.