Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court

    48 Cal. App. 4th 1489 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1996

    (A.F. of L. v. Labor Board (1940) 308 U.S. 401 [ 84 L.Ed. 347 , 60 S.Ct. 300 ]; Boire v. Greyhound Corp. (1964) 376 U.S. 473 [11 *1498 L.Ed.2d 849, 84 S.Ct. 894 ].) … The Leedom v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nick Hagopian Drywall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    204 Cal. App. 3d 767 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1988

    In Blew v. … Hagopian relies on an unpublished Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board decision, Zagainoff v. Smyth (1987) OAK 134259, 15 Cal. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

    47 Cal. App. 3d 360 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1975

    Department appealed, and in the case of California v. … (Crownover v. Musick, supra, pp. 417-418 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors

    166 Cal. App. 2d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1958

    City of Los Angeles, 6 Cal.2d 405 at 407 [ 57 P.2d 1323 ]; Vernon v. Board of Supervisors, 142 Cal. 513 at 516 [ 76 P. 253 ].) … We think this is emphasized by the fact that the cases of Wight v. Davidson, supra, and Walker v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wings West Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    187 Cal. App. 3d 1047 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1986

    The Board reversed the WCJ, relying on the decision of this court (Div. One) in Industrial Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 243 Cal.App.2d 700 . … The Board distinguished two of its own decisions 4 on which the WCJ relied. In Union Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    39 Cal. App. 3d 765 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1974

    In Hospital Service of California v. … (Santa Fe Transp. v. State Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 531, 539 [ 334 P.2d 907 ]; Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, 153 Cal.App.2d 673, 680 [ 315 P.2d 394 ].)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • California Department of Corrections v. State Personnel Board

    18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 390 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 2004

    CDC cites Nakamura v. … (Kim v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Butte View Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    95 Cal. App. 3d 961 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1979

    Y. v. N.L.R.B. (2d Cir. 1977) 555 F.2d 304 , 305. (In accord see National Labor Relations Board v. Carpenters Union, Local 180 (9th Cir. 1970) 433 F.2d 934, 935 ; N.L.R.B. v. … Brown & Root, Inc. (8th Cir. 1963) 311 F.2d 447, 452 .)) We have reviewed the formula used by the board. Charles Nakatani, one of the owners of petitioner, testified at the hearing.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Mickelson Concrete Co. v. Contractors' State License Board

    95 Cal. App. 3d 631 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1979

    (Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners (1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 564, 577-578 [ 146 Cal.Rptr. 653 ].) … Code, § 7, subd. 1; Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 709, 713 [ 218 P.2d 569 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State Compensation Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    29 Cal. App. 3d 902 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1973

    (Garzoli v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 2 Cal.3d at p. 505.) *907 In Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … The decision of the board is annulled, and the cause is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Taylor, P. J., and Rouse, J., concurred.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • County of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 2000

    (Bemer v. … Burrows v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Trabue Pittman Corp. v. Board of Supervisors

    49 Cal. App. 2d 463 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • County of Sonoma v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    222 Cal. App. 3d 1133 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1990

    (County of Madera v. … (County of Madera v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Western Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    99 Cal. App. 3d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1979

    (Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 69 Cal.2d 436, 439 .. . .) This rule is binding upon the board and this court. (Id. at p. 439.)’ (Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 2000

    (CCH) ¶ 401-797, p. 25,755; see, e.g., Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. … Although the courts “bear ultimate responsibility for construing the statute, we accord great respect to the Board’s interpretation.” (City of Gilroy v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Pulaski v. California Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board

    90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1999

    The Board’s position is not aided by California Lab. Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Stds. Bd., supra, 221 Cal.App.3d 1547 . … (United States v. Brown (1907) 206 U.S. 240, 244 [ 27 S.Ct. 620, 621 , 51 L.Ed. 1046, 1047 ].)

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • United Farm Workers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    41 Cal. App. 4th 303 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1995

    (See Malibu Committee for Incorporation v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 397, 410 [ 271 Cal.Rptr. 505 ], review den.; Mir v. … (United Farm Workers v. *311 Agricultural Labor Relations Board (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 347, 349 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 437 ]; accord, Harry Carian Sales v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Inyo Development Co. v. Board of Supervisors

    15 Cal. App. 387 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1911

    Thereupon, the board, after considering the evidence, appointed three viewers, one *389 of whom was a surveyor, to view and survey the proposed new road and to submit to the board an estimate of the cost of the opening thereof … Plaintiff thereupon sought by a writ of review to have the action of said board annulled, claiming that the record disclosed a want of jurisdiction in said board to make its orders opening said road and awarding said damages

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barclays Bank International Limited v. Franchise Tax Board

    10 Cal. App. 4th 1742 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1992

    Franchise Tax Bd. v. Superior Court (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 526, 545-546 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 695 ]; Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177, 179-180 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ]; see also California v. … (See Grayned v. City of Rockford, supra, 408 U.S. at p. 108; Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d at p. 231, fn. 30 ; Fisher v. City of Berkeley, supra, 37 Cal.3d at p. 702 .)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    136 Cal. App. 2d 577 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1955

    Spaulding & Bros. v. Edwards, 262 U.S. 66 [ 43 S.Ct. 485 , 67 L.Ed. 865 ]; and to Richfield Oil Corp. v. … A. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.