Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.51s
Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court
48 Cal. App. 4th 1489 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1996
(A.F. of L. v. Labor Board (1940) 308 U.S. 401 [ 84 L.Ed. 347 , 60 S.Ct. 300 ]; Boire v. Greyhound Corp. (1964) 376 U.S. 473 [11 *1498 L.Ed.2d 849, 84 S.Ct. 894 ].) … The Leedom v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNick Hagopian Drywall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
204 Cal. App. 3d 767 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1988
In Blew v. … Hagopian relies on an unpublished Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board decision, Zagainoff v. Smyth (1987) OAK 134259, 15 Cal. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 8 timesPublishedKirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
47 Cal. App. 3d 360 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1975
Department appealed, and in the case of California v. … (Crownover v. Musick, supra, pp. 417-418 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedFirestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors
166 Cal. App. 2d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1958
City of Los Angeles, 6 Cal.2d 405 at 407 [ 57 P.2d 1323 ]; Vernon v. Board of Supervisors, 142 Cal. 513 at 516 [ 76 P. 253 ].) … We think this is emphasized by the fact that the cases of Wight v. Davidson, supra, and Walker v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWings West Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
187 Cal. App. 3d 1047 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1986
The Board reversed the WCJ, relying on the decision of this court (Div. One) in Industrial Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 243 Cal.App.2d 700 . … The Board distinguished two of its own decisions 4 on which the WCJ relied. In Union Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
Cited 15 timesPublishedStandard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization
39 Cal. App. 3d 765 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1974
In Hospital Service of California v. … (Santa Fe Transp. v. State Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 531, 539 [ 334 P.2d 907 ]; Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, 153 Cal.App.2d 673, 680 [ 315 P.2d 394 ].)
Cited 14 timesPublishedCalifornia Department of Corrections v. State Personnel Board
18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 390 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 2004
CDC cites Nakamura v. … (Kim v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedButte View Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
95 Cal. App. 3d 961 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1979
Y. v. N.L.R.B. (2d Cir. 1977) 555 F.2d 304 , 305. (In accord see National Labor Relations Board v. Carpenters Union, Local 180 (9th Cir. 1970) 433 F.2d 934, 935 ; N.L.R.B. v. … Brown & Root, Inc. (8th Cir. 1963) 311 F.2d 447, 452 .)) We have reviewed the formula used by the board. Charles Nakatani, one of the owners of petitioner, testified at the hearing.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMickelson Concrete Co. v. Contractors' State License Board
95 Cal. App. 3d 631 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1979
(Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners (1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 564, 577-578 [ 146 Cal.Rptr. 653 ].) … Code, § 7, subd. 1; Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 709, 713 [ 218 P.2d 569 ].)
Cited 11 timesPublishedState Compensation Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
29 Cal. App. 3d 902 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1973
(Garzoli v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 2 Cal.3d at p. 505.) *907 In Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … The decision of the board is annulled, and the cause is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Taylor, P. J., and Rouse, J., concurred.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCounty of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 2000
(Bemer v. … Burrows v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedTrabue Pittman Corp. v. Board of Supervisors
49 Cal. App. 2d 463 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1942
Cited 0 timesPublishedCounty of Sonoma v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
222 Cal. App. 3d 1133 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1990
(County of Madera v. … (County of Madera v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedWestern Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
99 Cal. App. 3d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1979
(Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 69 Cal.2d 436, 439 .. . .) This rule is binding upon the board and this court. (Id. at p. 439.)’ (Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCiticorp North America, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 2000
(CCH) ¶ 401-797, p. 25,755; see, e.g., Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. … Although the courts “bear ultimate responsibility for construing the statute, we accord great respect to the Board’s interpretation.” (City of Gilroy v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedPulaski v. California Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board
90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1999
The Board’s position is not aided by California Lab. Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Stds. Bd., supra, 221 Cal.App.3d 1547 . … (United States v. Brown (1907) 206 U.S. 240, 244 [ 27 S.Ct. 620, 621 , 51 L.Ed. 1046, 1047 ].)
Cited 22 timesPublishedUnited Farm Workers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
41 Cal. App. 4th 303 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1995
(See Malibu Committee for Incorporation v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 397, 410 [ 271 Cal.Rptr. 505 ], review den.; Mir v. … (United Farm Workers v. *311 Agricultural Labor Relations Board (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 347, 349 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 437 ]; accord, Harry Carian Sales v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedInyo Development Co. v. Board of Supervisors
15 Cal. App. 387 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1911
Thereupon, the board, after considering the evidence, appointed three viewers, one *389 of whom was a surveyor, to view and survey the proposed new road and to submit to the board an estimate of the cost of the opening thereof … Plaintiff thereupon sought by a writ of review to have the action of said board annulled, claiming that the record disclosed a want of jurisdiction in said board to make its orders opening said road and awarding said damages
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarclays Bank International Limited v. Franchise Tax Board
10 Cal. App. 4th 1742 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1992
Franchise Tax Bd. v. Superior Court (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 526, 545-546 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 695 ]; Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177, 179-180 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ]; see also California v. … (See Grayned v. City of Rockford, supra, 408 U.S. at p. 108; Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d at p. 231, fn. 30 ; Fisher v. City of Berkeley, supra, 37 Cal.3d at p. 702 .)
Cited 14 timesPublishedMatson Navigation Co. v. State Board of Equalization
136 Cal. App. 2d 577 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1955
Spaulding & Bros. v. Edwards, 262 U.S. 66 [ 43 S.Ct. 485 , 67 L.Ed. 865 ]; and to Richfield Oil Corp. v. … A. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna