Case law

Sunnyside Nurseries, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

93 Cal. App. 3d 922 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1979

The burden of proof rested upon the Union and the Board to establish that Ms. Coyt’s employment was improperly terminated. (Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 536 F.2d 461, 464 ; N.L.R.B. v. … (Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co., 344 U.S. 344, 346 [ 97 L.Ed. 377, 381 , 73 S.Ct. 287 ].)

Epstein v. Hollywood Entertainment District II Business Improvement District

104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 857 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 2001

The POA’s Board of Directors Is a Legislative Body Within the Meaning of the Brown Act a. … Therefore, under the Brown Act, as interpreted by us in International Longshoremen’s, supra, 69 Cal.App.4th 287 , the POA’s board of directors, vis-a-vis BID I, was subject to the Brown Act, because the board was a legislative

Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization

109 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1952

In the case of Sharon v. … Com., 28 Cal.2d 33, 48 [ 168 P.2d 686 ]; Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 31 Cal.2d 833 [ 192 P.2d 929 ] ; Waterbury Sav. Bank v. Danaher, 128 Conn. 78 [ 20 A.2d 455 ].) In the Waterbury Sav.

El Camino Land Corp. v. Board of Supervisors

43 Cal. App. 2d 351 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 1941

In the case of Clough v. Baber, 38 Cal. … (Duncan Townsite Co. v. Lane, 245 U. S. 308 [38 Sup. Ct. 99, 62 L. Ed. 309 ]; Hutchison v. Reclamation Dist. No. 1619, supra; [ 81 Cal.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2025

Filed 12/11/25 P. v. … No. 24FE004159) v. KEVIN TYRONE BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.

Lukin v. State Board of Equalization

120 Cal. App. 2d 261 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1953

and wine licenses. ’ ’ In support of this contention appellants cite such cases as Johnstone v. … In support thereof appellants cite City of San Diego v. State Board of Equalization, 82 Cal.App.2d 453 [ 186 P.2d 166 ], which, like John *265 stone v.

Williams v. San Francisco Board of Permit Appeals

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 565 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1999

of Permit Appeals (Board). … Public Benefit v.

Crees v. California State Board of Medical Examiners

213 Cal. App. 2d 195 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1963

(Wilson v. Board of Retirement, 156 Cal.App.2d 195, 201 [ 319 P.2d 426 ].) … (People v. Mangiagli, supra; Duskin v. State Board of Dry Cleaners, 58 Cal.2d 155 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 404 , 373 P.2d 468 ].)

Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners

47 Cal. App. 793 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1920

THE COURT. [1] The facts in this case are identical with those set forth in the case of Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners, ante, p. 29, [ 190 Pac. 51 ], and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Baias v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

217 Cal. App. 3d 790 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1990

The Smith reasoning was reiterated as settled law in Dahlbeck v. Industrial Acc. … (Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 650 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 540 ]; State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Corsinotti) (1961) 196 Cal.App.2d 10 [ 16 Cal.Rptr. 323 ]; see Cal.

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

33 Cal. App. 4th 1242 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1995

(Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board (1970) 3 Cal.3d 745, 749 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 616 , 478 P.2d 48 ].) … (Allied-Signal v. Director, Tax.

Anaheim General Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 3d 468 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1970

The Board issued its Opinion and Order Denying Reconsideration. … In Pruitt v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. State Board of Equalization

204 Cal. App. 3d 1269 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1988

In Lemon v. … “Failure to exhaust administrative remedies before the *1291 Board is a jurisdictional procedural defect which bars court action contesting imposition of tax. [Citations.]” (Duffy v.

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

247 Cal. App. 4th 284 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016

No. 13CECG03374) v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al., Defendants and Respondents. … Proc., § 906.; see, e.g., Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666; Sanborn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. (1940) 42 Cal.App.2d 99, 105.)

Mak v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board

240 Cal. App. 4th 60 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 2015

(Action Apartment Assn., Inc. v. … Borello & Sons, Inc. v.

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

181 Cal. App. 4th 752 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2010

The stipulation was entered as an order by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). … (See Ferdig v.

First City Bank v. Franchise Tax Board

70 Cal. App. 3d 444 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1977

. * Plaintiff First City Bank (hereinafter First City) appeals from a summary judgment denying its claim for a $4,999 tax refund paid to respondent Franchise Tax Board (hereinafter Board). … Corp. v.

Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry

68 Cal. App. 2d 440 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1945

In October, 1938, the plaintiff was charged before the defendant board with violations of sections 3098 and 3125 of the Business and Professions Code. … (Laisne v. California St. Bd. of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ].)

Derrick v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

159 Cal. App. 3d 451 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1984

. 1 We agree and direct the Board to modify the award accordingly. … Fund v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 133 , 138-139 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 410 ]; see generally 1 Herlick, Cal. Workers’ Compensation Law (3d ed. 1984) § 4.18 et seq., p. 88 et seq.; Cal.

Bates v. State Board of Equalization

275 Cal. App. 2d 388 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1969

(Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 25 Cal.2d 918, 921 [156 P.2d 1] ; Michels v. Watson, 229 Cal.App.2d 404, 409 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 464 ].) … (County of Sacramento v. Hickman, supra, 66 Cal.2d at p. 848 .)