Case law

Placer County Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors

233 Cal. App. 2d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1965

(Hanley v. Murphy, supra, 40 Cal.2d at p. 581 ; O’Neill v. Williams, 53 Cal.App. 1, 4 [ 199 P. 870 ]; Foley v. … The present case has strong parallels to Rains v. County of Contra Costa, supra, 37 Cal.2d 263 . There the board of supervisors removed all physicians from the county civil service and placed them in an exempt status.

Torres v. Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority

89 Cal. App. 3d 545 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1979

(See Merchants Bank v. Escondido Irr. Dist. (1904) 144 Cal. 329, 333 [ 77 P. 937 ].) Such a holding is also in harmony with the intended broad coverage of the Brown Act. … A notice in the nature of an agenda, limited to Board members and requesting newspapers, radio or television stations, is required under the Brown Act for special meetings (Gov.

Whitlow v. State Board of Medical Examiners

128 Cal. App. 2d 671 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1954

(People v. Whitlow, 113 Cal.App.2d 804 [ 249 P.2d 35 ].) Judge Bartlett heard the proceeding in mandamus, made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and rendered judgment. … The membership of the board had changed after the matter had been previously heard, and four members of the board on March 3, 1953, were not on the board in March, 1951.

Union Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

231 Cal. App. 3d 983 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1991

(Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1986) 180 Cal.App.3d 565, 582 [ 225 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. … Oil Co. v. Byram, supra, 25 Cal.2d at p. 362 ; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte, supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at pp. 477-478.)

People v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 2026

Filed 1/9/26 P. v. … BF197977A) v. JIMMY RAY BROWN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

Sierra Club v. Napa County Board of Supervisors

205 Cal. App. 4th 162 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2012

(Hamilton v. … (San Dieguito Partnership v.

Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

227 Cal. App. 4th 1250 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 2014

(Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. … (Ornelas v.

E.L. Yeager Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

145 Cal. App. 4th 922 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 2006

This is because it is well established that any decision of the Board must be supported by substantial evidence. (§ 5952, subd. (d); Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Escobedo v.

Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

89 Cal. App. 3d 30 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1979

State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d 214, at pp. 225, 229 ; Board of Education v. … Board of Trustees (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 681, 688 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 192 ]; Board of Trustees v.

Sullivan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

15 Cal. App. 3d 959 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1971

Sullivan’s claim, based on new and further disability, is timely and the Board’s decision should be annulled. … (Standard Rectifier Corp. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 65 Cal.2d 287, 290 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 100 , 419 P.2d 164 ].) The Board found Sullivan’s claim untimely on grounds he received no benefits from Riverview.

Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

8 Cal. App. 3d 618 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1970

We note, however, the recent decision of our Supreme Court in LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App. … (Smith v. Workmen's Comp. *623 App. Bd. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 588, 592 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 455 P.2d 822 ); Lundberg v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 69 Cal.2d 436, 440 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 445 P.2d 300 ]; Zemke v.

Stewart v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

264 Cal. App. 2d 947 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1968

(Mayfield v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 16 Cal.App.2d 611 [ 61 P.2d 83 ]; Kast v. Miller & Lux, 159 Cal. 723 [ 115 P. 932 ].) … In Schatter v. Industrial Acc. Com., 11 Cal.2d 46 , the court said (pp. 50-51 [ 77 P.2d 836 ]) as quoted in Van Horn v. Industrial Acc.

Board of Supervisors v. De Lisle

160 Cal. App. 2d 599 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1958

In an action by the taxpayer, the order of the board was held to be in excess of jurisdiction and void. The decisions relied upon by appellant do not alter that rule. In one (Buswell v. … (Buswell v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 116 Cal. 351, 354 .) Appellant board cannot assert that respondent’s act in conforming to that plan is invalid. No claim of an aggrieved taxpayer is before us.

Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

168 Cal. App. 4th 696 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2008

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 483, 486, 493 [ 71 Cal.Rptr.3d 724 ] (Zenith); see Vera v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 996, 1000-1001 [ 65 Cal.Rptr.3d 151 ] (Vera).) … We annul the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) and remand the matter for the WCAB to determine whether a treating physician’s report indicated, based on substantial evidence in light of the entire

Western Contracting Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

265 Cal. App. 2d 568 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1968

Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1956) 139 Cal.App.2d 411 [ 294 P.2d 181 ] ; Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization (1958) 157 Cal.App.2d 85 [ 320 P.2d 552 ].)” (Union Oil Co. v. … (Automatic Canteen Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 372, 381 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 848 ]; Standard Register Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 259 Cal.App.2d 125, 130 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 803 ].)

Wheeler v. Board of Medical Examiners

98 Cal. App. 267 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1929

(Schainman v. Kierce, 199 Cal. 249 [ 248 Pac. 905 ].) It follows that the appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

135 Cal. App. 3d 853 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1982

(Petrucci v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 83, 88 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 735 ]; Borror v. Department of Investment (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 531, 540 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 525 ].) … (Meade v. State Collection Agency Board (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 774, 776 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 486 ]; West Coast etc. Co. v. Contractors' etc. Bd. (1945) 72 Cal.App.2d 287, 301-302 [ 164 P.2d 811 ].)

Debtor Reorganizers Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

58 Cal. App. 3d 691 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1976

of Equalization v. … Goggin (9th Cir. 1951) 191 F.2d 726 [ 27 A.L.R.2d 1211 ] [Goggin I] cert. den., 342 U.S. 909 [ 96 L.Ed. 680 , 72 S.Ct. 302 ], and California State Board of Equalization v.

Bowman v. Los Angeles City Board of Education

46 Cal. App. 2d 319 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1941

L. 229; Davis v. County of Los Angeles, 12 Cal. (2d) 412 [ 84 Pac. (2d) 1034 ].) But such power has a logical implication. … board with extensive powers.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 2025

No. 06F02832) v. PHILLIP LAMAR BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. … (See People v. Brown (June 26, 2008, C055179) [nonpub. opn.]