Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.43s

  • Lehmann v. Los Angeles City Board of Education

    154 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1957

    The first ground, elaborately argued in the briefs, has been waived by defendants since the decision in Porter v. … Defendants rely upon a well settled rule which we had occasion to state in Nutter v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Esquivel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    178 Cal. App. 4th 330 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 2009

    .”]; Ginns v. … (Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Taiheiyo Cement U.S.A., Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    204 Cal. App. 4th 254 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2012

    In Krumpotich v. … (Shoemaker v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State Board of Equalization v. Balboa Insurance

    89 Cal. App. 3d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1978

    In Bloom v. … (People v. United States Fire Ins. Co., supra, 61 Cal.App.3d at p. 235 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Commission on Professional Competence

    102 Cal. App. 3d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1980

    State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ]). Our high court in Board of Education v. … The appellant teacher in Board of Education v. Jack M., supra, 19 Cal. 3d 691 , was arrested for an alleged homosexual solicitation in a public restroom.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims Board

    239 Cal. App. 4th 1400 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2015

    Standard of Review The Board's ruling on a claim for compensation is subject to writ review under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. (See Tennison v. … Whether the Board's findings support the legal conclusions upon which it arrived at its ultimate determination presents a question of law. (JKH Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners

    48 Cal. App. 2d 682 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1941

    (Pennie v. Reis, 80 Cal. 266 [ 22 Pac. 176 ].) … It left the administration of the act to the “board -of police commissioners” or to a special commission of three of which the “chief of police” was one.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Torres v. Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority

    89 Cal. App. 3d 545 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1979

    (See Merchants Bank v. Escondido Irr. Dist. (1904) 144 Cal. 329, 333 [ 77 P. 937 ].) Such a holding is also in harmony with the intended broad coverage of the Brown Act. … A notice in the nature of an agenda, limited to Board members and requesting newspapers, radio or television stations, is required under the Brown Act for special meetings (Gov.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Whitlow v. State Board of Medical Examiners

    128 Cal. App. 2d 671 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1954

    (People v. Whitlow, 113 Cal.App.2d 804 [ 249 P.2d 35 ].) Judge Bartlett heard the proceeding in mandamus, made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and rendered judgment. … The membership of the board had changed after the matter had been previously heard, and four members of the board on March 3, 1953, were not on the board in March, 1951.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Union Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

    231 Cal. App. 3d 983 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1991

    (Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1986) 180 Cal.App.3d 565, 582 [ 225 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. … Oil Co. v. Byram, supra, 25 Cal.2d at p. 362 ; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte, supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at pp. 477-478.)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 2026

    Filed 1/9/26 P. v. … BF197977A) v. JIMMY RAY BROWN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sierra Club v. Napa County Board of Supervisors

    205 Cal. App. 4th 162 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2012

    (Hamilton v. … (San Dieguito Partnership v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    180 Cal. App. 3d 565 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1986

    Bk. v. … (Miller v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

    227 Cal. App. 4th 1250 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 2014

    (Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. … (Ornelas v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Newsham v. Board of Permit Appeals

    46 Cal. App. 4th 930 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1996

    (See Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 714-715 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ] [initiative measure may be amended or repealed only by the electorate].) … (Harman v. City and County of San Francisco (1972) 7 Cal.3d 150, 161 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 880 , 496 P.2d 1248 ]; Stuart v. Civil Service Com. (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 201, 206 [ 219 Cal.Rptr. 770 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    11 Cal. App. 5th 109 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2017

    ADJ8701916) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CHRISTOPHER RICE, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of review. … (Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 540 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 2001

    (Telles) petitions this court by a writ of review challenging the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB or Board). … “Because the issue here is the applicability of section 5502, subdivision (d)(3) and the Board’s duty to develop the record, this court applies a de novo standard of review.” (Kuykendall v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Placer County Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors

    233 Cal. App. 2d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1965

    (Hanley v. Murphy, supra, 40 Cal.2d at p. 581 ; O’Neill v. Williams, 53 Cal.App. 1, 4 [ 199 P. 870 ]; Foley v. … The present case has strong parallels to Rains v. County of Contra Costa, supra, 37 Cal.2d 263 . There the board of supervisors removed all physicians from the county civil service and placed them in an exempt status.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Haldeman v. Franchise Tax Board

    141 Cal. App. 3d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1983

    Haldeman filed a “Complaint for Refund of Personal Income Taxes” for the years 1974, 1975 and 1976 against the Franchise Tax Board (hereafter Board). … (See Commissioner v. Tellier (1966) 383 U.S. 687, 689 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 185 , 86 S.Ct. 1118 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • County of Alameda v. State Board of Control

    14 Cal. App. 4th 1096 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1993

    (See, e.g., People v. Blankenship (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 992 [ 262 Cal.Rptr. 141 ]; People v. … In County of San Diego v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.