Case law

City National Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 2007

Relying upon State Bd. of Equalization v. … (See Schatz v.

Lin v. Medical Board of California

52 Cal. App. 4th 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1997

(In re Ross (1937) 8 Cal.2d 608, 609 [ 67 P.2d 94 , 110 A.L.R. 217 ]; Lee v. … (a); see Asdourian v. Araj (1985) 38 Cal.3d 276, 289, fn. 8 [ 211 Cal.Rptr. 703 , 696 P.2d 95 ].) The advice to get board approval to change their names was, however, correct.

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

6 Cal. App. 3d 149 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1970

Franchise Tax Board, supra, 246 Cal.App.2d 812, 819 . See also, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 69 Cal.2d 506, 512; El Dorado Oil Works v. … (See RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 246 Cal.App.2d 812, 820 ; and Richfield Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 169 Cal.App.2d 331, 337 .)

Furtado v. Sierra Community College

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 589 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1998

Contending the board’s procedures had violated the Brown Act, Furtado filed a petition for writ of mandate. … Discussion The facts in this matter are undisputed; the issue on appeal is whether the actions taken violated the Brown Act. (Gov. Code, § 54953 et seq.) 1 Accordingly, our review is de novo. (See Bullock v.

People v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 2025

Filed 9/5/25 P. v. … Brown may not be recharged or retried on that charge. (See Tibbs v. Florida (1982) 457 U.S. 31, 41–42; Burks v. United States (1978) 437 U.S. 1, 10–18; People v.

California State Employees' Ass'n v. State Personnel Board

178 Cal. App. 3d 372 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1986

(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. … (See Central Manufacturing District, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1960) 176 Cal.App.2d 850, 857 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 733 ]; 9 Witkin, op. cit. supra, § 249, pp. 255-256.)

Sabath v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

67 Cal. App. 4th 286 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1998

The CHP petitioned for reconsideration by the Board. … Appeals Bd. (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 953 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 466 ]; Dept. of Motor Vehicles v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1947) 78 Cal.App.2d 626 [ 178 P.2d 43 ] (DMV); Edgar v. Workers’ Comp.

Filipino Accountants' Ass'n v. State Board of Accountancy

155 Cal. App. 3d 1023 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1984

Interest v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 241, 246 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 766 ].) … Accordingly, we entertain the Board’s appeal. n We first examine the federal Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Awards Act. “In Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.

Cal-American Income Property Fund VII v. Brown Development Corp.

138 Cal. App. 3d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1982

(See Turner v. Superior Court (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 804, 815-816 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 475 ]; Morand v. Superior Court (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 347, 351 [ 113 Cal. Rptr. 281 ]; Nulaid Farmers Assn. v. … (Lesser & Son v. Seymour (1950) 35 *275 Cal.2d 494, 503-504 [ 218 P.2d 536 ]; People v. Riverside University, supra, 35 Cal.App.3d at p. 582 .)

Carmel Valley View, Ltd. v. Board of Supervisors

58 Cal. App. 3d 817 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1976

Respondent appealed to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors. Following a public hearing, the board denied the appeal. … County of Inyo v.

Rohrback v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

144 Cal. App. 3d 896 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1983

(Kerley v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … We reject petitioner’s second argument, that the board erred in incorporating by reference the findings of the worker’s compensation judge as the board’s own. (See, e.g., Gaiera v. Workmen’s Comp.

Gurule v. Board of Pension Commissioners

126 Cal. App. 3d 523 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1981

Issue on Appeal The court arrived at its decision by applying the law as stated in Gelman v. … (See Dillard v. City of Los Angeles (1942) 20 Cal.2d 599 [ 127 P.2d 917 ]; Bradley v. City of Los Angeles (1942) 55 Cal.App.2d 592 [ 131 P.2d 391 ]; Faber v.

Zenith Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 380 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2006

(PM & R Associates v. Workers’ Comp. … The Board also concluded that Zenith waived the issue by not raising it; however, this alleged failure did not obviate the lien claimants’ burden of proof. (See Kunz v.

Myers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 120 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1971

Writs of review thereafter issued on four consolidated cases, one of which was petitioner’s, and subsequently the court in Nelsen v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. … fault was fashioned by the courts, and that no amount was due and unpaid until after the board’s decision following remittitur. 1 *123 In Myers v.

Beverly Hilton Hotel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

176 Cal. App. 4th 1597 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 2009

v. … The term “ghost statute” was used by the Board in Godinez v.

Feldman v. Sacramento Board of Realtors, Inc.

119 Cal. App. 3d 739 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1981

V., Inc. v. … In United States v.

County of Kern v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

200 Cal. App. 4th 509 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2011

Indeed, the Court of Appeal in Machado v. … of supervisors or governing board resolution requirement.

Harris Transportation Co. v. Air Resources Board

32 Cal. App. 4th 1472 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1995

(Morton v. Board of Registered Nursing (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1560, 1566, fn. 5 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 502 ].) … In People v.

Wood v. Board of Fire Commissioners

50 Cal. App. 593 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1920

This is an original proceeding for a writ of prohibition against the board of fire commissioners of the city of Los Angeles.

County of Alameda v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

213 Cal. App. 4th 278 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2013

.) *282 Knittel disputed the County’s interpretation of the law and requested a hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). … (See Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp.