Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

4.30s

  • Griswold v. Mt. Diablo Unified School District

    63 Cal. App. 3d 648 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1976

    In Savoy Club v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 12 Cal.App.3d 1034, 1042 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 198 ], the court quoted Jenner v. … (Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 1, 5 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Kawano, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    106 Cal. App. 3d 937 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1980

    In National Labor Relations Board v. Anchor Rome Mills, supra, 228 F.2d 775 , the Board had found a discriminatory failure to reemploy 35 former strikers. … That question rests in the Board’s area of expertise (Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Bd., supra, 340 U.S. 474 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lax v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

    116 Cal. App. 3d 669 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1981

    (Christensen v. Orr (1969) 275 Cal.App.2d 12 [ 79 Cal.Rptr. 656 ]; Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 709 [ 218 P.2d 569 ].) … (Petrucci v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 83 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 735 ], hg. den.; Shakin v. Board of Medical Examiners (1967). 254 Cal.App.2d 102, 110 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 274 , 23 A.L.R.3d 1398 ], hg. den.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Board of Parole Hearings

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 2022

    (Rauber v. Herman (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 942, 947 (Rauber); County of Sutter v. Board of Administration (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 1288, 1293.) … Disagreeing with our conclusion, the Office observes that Marsy’s Law authorized the San Diego District Attorney to petition for writ of mandate on behalf of the People in Santos v. Brown (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 398.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacific Bell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    186 Cal. App. 3d 1603 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1986

    In Shaw v. … (See Wood v. Brown (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 232, 235, fn. 2 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 63 ]; Jackson v. Hayakawa (9th Cir. 1982) 682 F.2d 1344 , 1347.) Contrary to Pacific Bell’s contention, Amato v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization

    109 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1952

    In the case of Sharon v. … Com., 28 Cal.2d 33, 48 [ 168 P.2d 686 ]; Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 31 Cal.2d 833 [ 192 P.2d 929 ] ; Waterbury Sav. Bank v. Danaher, 128 Conn. 78 [ 20 A.2d 455 ].) In the Waterbury Sav.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Coast Elevator Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    44 Cal. App. 3d 576 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1975

    (a); Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … If so, the remedy is in the Legislature or with the Board, not with this court. As was said in Cowart v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • City of Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    11 Cal. App. 5th 109 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2017

    ADJ8701916) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CHRISTOPHER RICE, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of review. … (Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bassett-McGregor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    205 Cal. App. 3d 1102 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1988

    On review, a decision of the Board will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, including reasonable inferences from the testimony. (Alford v. … (See, e.g., Alford v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    38 Cal. App. 4th 820 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1995

    Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1986) 51 Cal.Comp.Cases 321 [writ den.] (Williams); Emporium-Capwells Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 48 Cal.Comp.Cases 801 [writ den.] (Tidwell); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. … Appeals Bd. (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 455, 462 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 130 ]), they are citable authority as to the holding of the Board (see Coltherd v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Current, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

    24 Cal. App. 4th 382 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1994

    Bellas Hess v. Dept, of Revenue (1967) 386 U.S. 753 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 505 , 87 S.Ct. 1389 ] (Bellas Hess), and again in Quill Corp. v. … Finally, in SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McGinn v. State Board of Harbor Commissioners

    113 Cal. App. 695 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1931

    In the early case of Breed v. … (San Leandro v. Le Breton, 72 Cal. 170, 175 [ 13 Pac. 405 ]; Davidow v. Griswold, 23 Cal. App. 188, 192 [ 137 Pac. 619 ]; Elliott v. McIntosh, 41 Cal. App. 763, 767 [ 183 Pac. 692 ].)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 540 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 2001

    (Telles) petitions this court by a writ of review challenging the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB or Board). … “Because the issue here is the applicability of section 5502, subdivision (d)(3) and the Board’s duty to develop the record, this court applies a de novo standard of review.” (Kuykendall v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    33 Cal. App. 4th 1242 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1995

    (Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board (1970) 3 Cal.3d 745, 749 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 616 , 478 P.2d 48 ].) … (Allied-Signal v. Director, Tax.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oranen v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

    77 Cal. App. 4th 258 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1999

    The Legality of the Board’s Cost-reimbursement Regulation The ALJ’s decision, later adopted by the full Board, requires appellant to pay the Board the sum of $7,844 by way of costs related to the reimbursement hearing. … It so happens that the Board is one of the few such licensing and disciplinary boards not within the State Department of Consumer Affairs. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 101.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • County of Alameda v. State Board of Control

    14 Cal. App. 4th 1096 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1993

    (See, e.g., People v. Blankenship (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 992 [ 262 Cal.Rptr. 141 ]; People v. … In County of San Diego v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Haldeman v. Franchise Tax Board

    141 Cal. App. 3d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1983

    Haldeman filed a “Complaint for Refund of Personal Income Taxes” for the years 1974, 1975 and 1976 against the Franchise Tax Board (hereafter Board). … (See Commissioner v. Tellier (1966) 383 U.S. 687, 689 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 185 , 86 S.Ct. 1118 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hall CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 2026

    Filed 3/3/26 Brown v. … ] official capacity as [] Board Member[s]” (Brown action).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. Board of Police & Fire Pension Commissioners

    74 Cal. App. 2d 919 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1946

    It is conceded that the issues raised on this appeal are identical with those presented in the ease of Larson v. Board, of Police etc. … Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated in the case of Larson v. Board of Police etc. Commissioners, supra, the judgment from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. York, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mak v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board

    240 Cal. App. 4th 60 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 2015

    (Action Apartment Assn., Inc. v. … Borello & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.