Case law

Cupertino Sanitary District v. Board of Supervisors

208 Cal. App. 2d 52 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1962

In Wallace v. Ansill, etc., et al. (No. 72023, May 16, 1957), the Superior Court of Orange County was called upon to interpret the same code sections. … (See City & County of San Francisco v. Boyd (1943) 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 [ 140 P.2d 666 ].)

Stocker Resources, Inc. v. Assessment Appeals Board

49 Cal. App. 4th 391 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 1996

(Piarulle v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1035 (1983); Schenk v. Commissioner, 35 T.C.M. (CCH) 1652 (1976).) … [Lignos v. United States (2d Cir. 1971) 439 F.2d 1365, 1368 .]’” (Herschler v. Commissioner, supra, 48 T.C.M. (CCH) 1475, 1478 .)

United States v. State Water Resources Control Board

182 Cal. App. 3d 82 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1986

.; Johnson *114 Rancho County Water Dist. v. State Water Rights Board, supra, 235 Cal.App.2d 863 .) Mountain Defense League v. … “Pat” Brown in guiding the critical funding measure through political thickets resulting in the passage of the 1959 Bums-Porter Act (Cal. Water Resources Development Bond Act; § 12930 et seq.).

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

219 Cal. App. 3d 1265 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1990

In Dickow v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 762 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 317 ], this district, following Argonaut Mining v. Ind. Acc. … In Van Voorhis v. Workmen’s Comp.

Interinsurance Exchange v. State Board of Equalization

156 Cal. App. 3d 606 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1984

Co. v. … Co. v.

Hibernia Bank v. State Board of Equalization

166 Cal. App. 3d 393 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1985

Co. v. … (Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 866 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 820 , 616 P.2d 802 ].)

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

104 Cal. App. 3d 528 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1980

affected by an order, decision, or award of the appeals board.” 1 In Gumilla v. … The Board determined that his special mission did not end until he had entered the “safety of his house.” The only case cited by any party on that issue is Charak v.

Capiscean Corp. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

87 Cal. App. 3d 996 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 2, 1979

this extraordinary writ proceeding, authorized by section 23090 of the Business and Professions Code, 1 we consider the validity of fair trade laws regulating the sale of wine in this state, in light of the ruling in Rice v. … On appeal to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (hereafter Board), the Board, following Rice , reversed the decision of the Department with respect to the counts alleging sale of distilled spirits below the minimum

City National Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 2007

Relying upon State Bd. of Equalization v. … (See Schatz v.

County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare Board

199 Cal. App. 2d 468 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1962

(Drummery v. State Board of Funeral Directors, 13 Cal.2d 75 [ 87 P.2d 848 ] ; Ldisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Dare v. … (McDonough v. Goodcell, 13 Cal.2d 741 [ 91 P.2d 1035 , 123 A.L.R. 1205 ] ; Eousman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 84 Cal.App.2d 308 [ 190 P.2d 653 , 192 P.2d 45 ] ; McDonough v.

County of Amador v. State Board of Equalization

240 Cal. App. 2d 205 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1966

(See Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 535, 543-544 [32 P.2d 135]; Hanks v. State Board of Equalization, 229 Cal.App.2d 427, 433-436 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 478 ]; Michels v. … (County of Tuolumne v. State Board of Equalization, supra.)

Lin v. Medical Board of California

52 Cal. App. 4th 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1997

(In re Ross (1937) 8 Cal.2d 608, 609 [ 67 P.2d 94 , 110 A.L.R. 217 ]; Lee v. … (a); see Asdourian v. Araj (1985) 38 Cal.3d 276, 289, fn. 8 [ 211 Cal.Rptr. 703 , 696 P.2d 95 ].) The advice to get board approval to change their names was, however, correct.

Griswold v. Mt. Diablo Unified School District

63 Cal. App. 3d 648 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1976

In Savoy Club v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 12 Cal.App.3d 1034, 1042 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 198 ], the court quoted Jenner v. … (Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 1, 5 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)

Bank of America v. State Board of Equalization

209 Cal. App. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1962

Co. v. California State Board of Equalization, supra.) … Co. v. California State Board of Equalization, supra-, Northwestern Pac. R.R. v. State Board of Equalization, 21 Cal.2d 524 [ 133 P.2d 400 ].) In Los Angeles etc. School Dist. v.

Eistrat v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

190 Cal. App. 2d 29 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1961

(Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 556 [ 261 P.2d 261 ]; Boyd v. Pendegast, 57 Cal.App. 504, 506 [ 207 P. 713 ].) Greene v. … Such boards are vested with a high discretion and its abuse must appear very clearly before the courts will interfere.” (Maxwell v. Civil Service Com., 169 Cal. 336, 339 [ 146 P. 869 ]; Nelson v.

Clar v. Board of Trade of San Francisco

164 Cal. App. 2d 636 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1958

(Gagne v. Bertran, 43 Cal.2d 481 [275 P.2d *645 15]; Gonsalves v. Hodgson, 38 Cal.2d 91 [ 237 P.2d 656 ]; Spreckels v. Gorrill, 152 Cal. 383 [ 92 P. 1011 ]; McMahon v. Grimes, 206 Cal. 526 [ 275 P. 440 ]; Richard v. … In Bagdasarian v.

Bontrager v. SISKIYOU COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD

118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 182 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 2002

Co. v. City and County of San Francisco (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 1142, 1150 [ 236 Cal.Rptr. 869 ] *331 (Prudential).) … (Lusardi Construction Co. v. California Occupational *333 Safety & Health Appeals Bd. (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 639, 645 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 297 ].)

Reader's Digest Ass'n v. Franchise Tax Board

94 Cal. App. 4th 1240 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 2001

In the 1959 decision Portland Cement Co. v. … RDS&S had its own board of directors, although there was some overlap with the RDA board membership; the trial court also noted, “[ojfficers and directors of RDS&S were also officers and directors of RDA.”

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

165 Cal. App. 3d 633 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1985

v. … The period of evaluation commenced on January 28, 1982, and terminated on June 28, 1982. 2 The Board’s interpretation of section 139.5 in Ponce de Leon v.

Rudick v. State Board of Optometry

California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 2019

(See People v. … (People v.