Case law

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

118 Cal. App. 416 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1931

City Council of Los Angeles, 178 Cal. 610 [ 174 Pac. 45 ], this court declined to follow the case of Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors ( 131 Cal. 364 [ 82 Am. St. … Or just as said in Wolfskill v.

Tripp v. Board of Fire & Police Pension Commissioners

94 Cal. App. 720 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1928

V.) … In State v. Board of Trustees, 192 Mo. App. 583 [ 184 S.

Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

38 Cal. App. 4th 820 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1995

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1986) 51 Cal.Comp.Cases 321 [writ den.] (Williams); Emporium-Capwells Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 48 Cal.Comp.Cases 801 [writ den.] (Tidwell); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. … Appeals Bd. (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 455, 462 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 130 ]), they are citable authority as to the holding of the Board (see Coltherd v. Workers’ Comp.

Bassett-McGregor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

205 Cal. App. 3d 1102 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1988

On review, a decision of the Board will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, including reasonable inferences from the testimony. (Alford v. … (See, e.g., Alford v.

Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors

157 Cal. App. 3d 1122 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1984

(Eu v. Chacon (1976) 16 Cal.3d 465, 470 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 546 P.2d 289 ]; Friends of Lake Arrowhead v. Board of Supervisors (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 497, 506 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 539 ]; see County of Sacramento v. … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; California Teachers Assn. v.

Current, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

24 Cal. App. 4th 382 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1994

Bellas Hess v. Dept, of Revenue (1967) 386 U.S. 753 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 505 , 87 S.Ct. 1389 ] (Bellas Hess), and again in Quill Corp. v. … Finally, in SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v.

Davie v. Board of Regents, University of California

66 Cal. App. 693 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1924

Jur., 518; Tollefson Admx. v. City of Ottawa, 228 Ill. 134 [11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 990, 81 N. E. 823 ]; Summers v. Board of Commissioners, 103 Ind. 262 [ 53 Am. Rep. 512 , 2 N. E. 725 ]; Zummo v. … (Perkins v. Blauth, 163 Cal. 782 [ 127 Pac. 50 ].) Lundy v.

Ybarra v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

103 Cal. App. 4th 987 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2002

(LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 637 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 463 P.2d 432 ].) … Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 856, 859 [ 193 P.2d 745 ]; Coborn v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 713, 716 [ 192 P.2d 959 ].)

Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

26 Cal. App. 3d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1972

McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 432, 441 [ 110 P.2d 419 , 134 A.L.R. 1424 ]; Burnham v. Franchise Tax Board (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 438, 445 [ 341 P.2d 844 ]). … (Woodland Production Credit Assn. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 225 Cal.App.2d at p. 298 .)

Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. App. 4th 227 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1993

Western filed with the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) a petition for reconsideration pursuant to section 5900. Industrial also filed a petition for reconsideration. … V.

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 19, 2026

Filed 5/19/26 P. v. … No. 21FE020034) v. JULIAN JASON BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. Defendant Julian Jason Brown participated in a drive-by shooting at a birthday party attended by rival gang members.

San Diegans for Open Government v. City of Oceanside

4 Cal. App. 5th 637 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 2016

The Brown Act With respect to the Brown Act, we begin by noting that where, as is the case here, the facts are undisputed, we determine a local agency's compliance de novo. (Castaic Lake Water Agency v. … When the Legislature enacted the Brown Act, it declared that "the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business.

Holbrook v. City of Santa Monica

51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2006

The term “any interested person” has been defined broadly for purposes of the Brown Act. In McKee v. … Support for this state-citizenship-based right came from Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ], a non-Brown Act case that was nonetheless instructive.

United Steelworkers of America v. Board of Education

162 Cal. App. 3d 823 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1984

(See Turner v. Board of Trustees, supra, 16 Cal.3d at p. 823 ; Lindros v. Governing Bd. of the Torrance Unified School Dist., supra, 9 Cal.3d at p. 532; Bekiaris v. Board of Education, supra, 6 Cal.3d at pp. 586-587.) … It was, therefore, unclear whether this language was to have the same meaning as under the Brown Act, or if instead the school board’s duty was somehow broader than it had previously been.

Page v. Miracosta Community College District

180 Cal. App. 4th 471 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 2009

Brown Act” (italics added)]; Wolfe v. … The policy underlying the Brown Act is that public boards and agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business; the law is intended to mandate open and public actions and deliberations. (§ 54950; Epstein v.

Borten v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 178 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2006

In Bisno v. … We reject the board’s claim that the appeal is moot because Lard vacated her apartment (People v.

People Ex Rel. Lynch v. San Diego Unified School District

19 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1971

In Brown v. … (Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, supra, 347 U.S. 483, 493 [ 98 L.Ed. 873, 880 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 ].)

Californians Aware v. Joint Labor/Management Benefits Committee

200 Cal. App. 4th 972 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 2011

‘into existence’ ” the commission, committee, board, or other body. (Epstein v. Hollywood Entertainment Dist. II Bus. … (See also Shapiro v. Board of Directors (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 170, 183, fn. 17 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 826 ] [quoting Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v.

Cano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

81 Cal. App. 4th 225 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 2000

(Johnson v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 197, 200 [ 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 422 ].) … The Board adopted this reasoning. The Board’s conclusion conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Los Angeles v. Indus. Acc. Com. (1927) 202 Cal. 437 [ 261 P. 295 ] (County of Los Angeles).)

Garcia v. Bellflower Unified School District Governing Board

220 Cal. App. 4th 1058 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 2013

VC060235) v. GOVERNING BOARD OF BELLFLOWER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Philip H. Hickok, Judge. … (Morcos v. Board of Retirement (1990) 51 Cal.3d 924, 927-928.)