Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • Frazer v. Dixon Unified School District

    18 Cal. App. 4th 781 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1993

    (Joiner v. … (Set D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1,22 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Ruiz v. Department of Corrections

    77 Cal. App. 4th 891 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2000

    He cites State Personnel Bd. v. … Otherwise, they are bound by the factual findings of the Board in future litigation. (Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 235, 240-244 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 764 ]; Oquendo v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sultan Turkish Bath v. Board Police Comrs.

    169 Cal. App. 2d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1959

    Board, 108 Cal.App.2d 48, 49 [ 238 P.2d 23 ].) [3] In reviewing proceedings before the board this court is bound to disregard all evidence contrary to that received in support of the findings of the board. (Thompson v. … (Wotton v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Industrial Accident Commission

    3 Cal. App. 2d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1934

    After a hearing, the respondent commission decided that the county of Los Angeles was the general employer and that the Board of Education was the special employer; that the board received the benefit of his service and that … These conclusions are clearly consistent with and sustained by the decision in the case of McBurney v. Industrial Acc.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Anthony v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

    179 Cal. App. 2d 262 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1960

    In Endo *266 v. State Board of Equalization, 143 Cal.App.2d 395 [ 300 P.2d 366 ], the court said at pages 401-402: “. . . … In Greenblatt v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Board of Supervisors

    40 Cal. App. 3d 1059 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1974

    Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 434 [271 p. 487]; Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477, 495 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ]; West Coast Advertising Co. v. … (See Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 39 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ]; Brougher v. Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 432-435 [ 271 P. 497 ].)”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Madrigal v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims Board

    6 Cal. App. 5th 1108 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2016

    Co. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 1247, 1275 [ 109 Cal.Rptr.2d 611 ].) … (Joannou v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 746, 752 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 158 ] (Joannou).)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United Enterprises, Ltd. v. Assessment Appeals Board

    22 Cal. App. 4th 152 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1994

    Western E & P, Inc. v. County of Lake (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 974, 984-985 [ 274 Cal.Rptr. 313 ].) … Dismissal is the remedy, for a lawsuit filed before administrative remedies are exhausted (Park ’N Fly of San Francisco, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mission Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    84 Cal. App. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1978

    Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board (1967) 66 Cal.2d 944 . . . .) … . ; Adams v. Tuxedo Land Co., 92 Cal.App. 266 . . . ; Carnes v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 21 Cal. App. (2d) 568 . . . ; Helm v. Bagley, 113 Cal.App. 602 . . . ; Cain v. Marquez, 31 Cal.App. (2d) 430 . . . ; Martinelli v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

    142 Cal. App. 3d 123 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1983

    (Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 204, 211 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 894 ].) … Employers Council v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2018

    (Board). … Brown subsequently appealed this denial of benefits, but the Board affirmed it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fettgather v. Board of Psychology

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2017

    health. (§ 820; 16 C.C.R. § 1380.4 [authorizing Board’s executive officer to conduct examinations pursuant to section 820]; Arnett v. … (Arnett, supra,14 Cal.4th at p. 9; Kees v. Medical Board (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1801, 1814 (Kees); Alexander D. v. State Bd. of Dental Examiners (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 92, 97 (Alexander D.).)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. San Bernardino Real Estate Board

    168 Cal. App. 2d 661 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1959

    The San Bernardino Real Estate Building Board Association was joined as a defendant on the theory that it was the alter ego of defendant San Bernardino Real Estate Board. … Plaintiff protested his loss of membership and demanded reinstatement, and on March 23, 1955, was advised by the board as follows: “If you can certify to the Board of Directors of the San Bernardino Real Estate Board that

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mapo, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

    53 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1975

    Thus in Valier Coal Company v. … Productions thus fully complied with the spirit of the Board’s contemporaneous interpretation of section 6006, an interpretation which we are entitled to weigh in construing the statute. (Coca-Cola Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Marble Mortgage Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

    241 Cal. App. 2d 26 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1966

    Bank v. Franchise Tax Board, 55 Cal.2d 407 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 359 P.2d 625 ], appeal dismissed 368 U.S. 3 [ 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 ]). … Franchise Tax Board, 231 Cal.App.2d 278 [41 Cal.Rptr. 673]; Peterson Tractor Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

    11 Cal. App. 3d 963 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1970

    (Barkin v. Board of Optometry, 269 Cal.App.2d 714 [ 75 Cal.Rptr. 337 ]; Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 153 Cal.App.2d 249 [ 314 P.2d 500 ].) … The judgment is reversed, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of Board. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cambell Industries v. State Board of Equalization

    167 Cal. App. 3d 863 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1985

    The ultimate resolution, however, of whether the Board has correctly interpreted its own regulations rests with the courts. (Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v. … In resolving the issue, we preliminarily note that the Board’s interpretation of its own regulations finds support in Union Oil Co. v. State Bd. of Equal. (1963) 60 Cal.2d 441 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ].

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • California Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education

    129 Cal. App. 3d 826 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1982

    (Fry v. Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]; Rible v. Hughes (1944) 24 Cal.2d 437 [ 150 P.2d 455 , 154 A.L.R. 137 ]; Lawe v. … El Monte School Dist. (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 20 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 554 ]; Sayre v. Board of Trustees (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 488 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 355 ].)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. California State Board of Pharmacy

    37 Cal. App. 4th 229 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1995

    (Banks v. Board of Pharmacy, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at p. 713 .) … (See also Wheeler v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

    267 Cal. App. 2d 895 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1968

    (Dethlefsen v. State Board of Equalization, 145 Cal.App.2d 561 [ 303 P.2d 7 ].) … (Farah v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 159 Cal.App.2d 335, 338 [ 324 P.2d 98 ]; Jacques, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 155 Cal.App.2d 448, 462-463 [ 318 P.2d 6 ]; People v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.