Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.23s
Frazer v. Dixon Unified School District
18 Cal. App. 4th 781 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1993
(Joiner v. … (Set D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1,22 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)
Cited 29 timesPublishedRuiz v. Department of Corrections
77 Cal. App. 4th 891 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2000
He cites State Personnel Bd. v. … Otherwise, they are bound by the factual findings of the Board in future litigation. (Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 235, 240-244 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 764 ]; Oquendo v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSultan Turkish Bath v. Board Police Comrs.
169 Cal. App. 2d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1959
Board, 108 Cal.App.2d 48, 49 [ 238 P.2d 23 ].) [3] In reviewing proceedings before the board this court is bound to disregard all evidence contrary to that received in support of the findings of the board. (Thompson v. … (Wotton v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Industrial Accident Commission
3 Cal. App. 2d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1934
After a hearing, the respondent commission decided that the county of Los Angeles was the general employer and that the Board of Education was the special employer; that the board received the benefit of his service and that … These conclusions are clearly consistent with and sustained by the decision in the case of McBurney v. Industrial Acc.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAnthony v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
179 Cal. App. 2d 262 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1960
In Endo *266 v. State Board of Equalization, 143 Cal.App.2d 395 [ 300 P.2d 366 ], the court said at pages 401-402: “. . . … In Greenblatt v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAtlantic Richfield Co. v. Board of Supervisors
40 Cal. App. 3d 1059 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1974
Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 434 [271 p. 487]; Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477, 495 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ]; West Coast Advertising Co. v. … (See Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 39 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ]; Brougher v. Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 432-435 [ 271 P. 497 ].)”
Cited 10 timesPublishedMadrigal v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims Board
6 Cal. App. 5th 1108 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2016
Co. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 1247, 1275 [ 109 Cal.Rptr.2d 611 ].) … (Joannou v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 746, 752 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 158 ] (Joannou).)
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited Enterprises, Ltd. v. Assessment Appeals Board
22 Cal. App. 4th 152 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1994
Western E & P, Inc. v. County of Lake (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 974, 984-985 [ 274 Cal.Rptr. 313 ].) … Dismissal is the remedy, for a lawsuit filed before administrative remedies are exhausted (Park ’N Fly of San Francisco, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMission Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
84 Cal. App. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1978
Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board (1967) 66 Cal.2d 944 . . . .) … . ; Adams v. Tuxedo Land Co., 92 Cal.App. 266 . . . ; Carnes v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 21 Cal. App. (2d) 568 . . . ; Helm v. Bagley, 113 Cal.App. 602 . . . ; Cain v. Marquez, 31 Cal.App. (2d) 430 . . . ; Martinelli v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCampbell v. Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
142 Cal. App. 3d 123 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1983
(Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 204, 211 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 894 ].) … Employers Council v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2018
(Board). … Brown subsequently appealed this denial of benefits, but the Board affirmed it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFettgather v. Board of Psychology
California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2017
health. (§ 820; 16 C.C.R. § 1380.4 [authorizing Board’s executive officer to conduct examinations pursuant to section 820]; Arnett v. … (Arnett, supra,14 Cal.4th at p. 9; Kees v. Medical Board (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1801, 1814 (Kees); Alexander D. v. State Bd. of Dental Examiners (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 92, 97 (Alexander D.).)
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. San Bernardino Real Estate Board
168 Cal. App. 2d 661 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1959
The San Bernardino Real Estate Building Board Association was joined as a defendant on the theory that it was the alter ego of defendant San Bernardino Real Estate Board. … Plaintiff protested his loss of membership and demanded reinstatement, and on March 23, 1955, was advised by the board as follows: “If you can certify to the Board of Directors of the San Bernardino Real Estate Board that
Cited 3 timesPublishedMapo, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
53 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1975
Thus in Valier Coal Company v. … Productions thus fully complied with the spirit of the Board’s contemporaneous interpretation of section 6006, an interpretation which we are entitled to weigh in construing the statute. (Coca-Cola Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMarble Mortgage Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
241 Cal. App. 2d 26 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1966
Bank v. Franchise Tax Board, 55 Cal.2d 407 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 359 P.2d 625 ], appeal dismissed 368 U.S. 3 [ 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 ]). … Franchise Tax Board, 231 Cal.App.2d 278 [41 Cal.Rptr. 673]; Peterson Tractor Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAnderson v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
11 Cal. App. 3d 963 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1970
(Barkin v. Board of Optometry, 269 Cal.App.2d 714 [ 75 Cal.Rptr. 337 ]; Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 153 Cal.App.2d 249 [ 314 P.2d 500 ].) … The judgment is reversed, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of Board. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCambell Industries v. State Board of Equalization
167 Cal. App. 3d 863 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1985
The ultimate resolution, however, of whether the Board has correctly interpreted its own regulations rests with the courts. (Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v. … In resolving the issue, we preliminarily note that the Board’s interpretation of its own regulations finds support in Union Oil Co. v. State Bd. of Equal. (1963) 60 Cal.2d 441 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ].
Cited 7 timesPublishedCalifornia Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education
129 Cal. App. 3d 826 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1982
(Fry v. Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]; Rible v. Hughes (1944) 24 Cal.2d 437 [ 150 P.2d 455 , 154 A.L.R. 137 ]; Lawe v. … El Monte School Dist. (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 20 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 554 ]; Sayre v. Board of Trustees (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 488 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 355 ].)
Cited 5 timesPublishedSmith v. California State Board of Pharmacy
37 Cal. App. 4th 229 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1995
(Banks v. Board of Pharmacy, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at p. 713 .) … (See also Wheeler v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedKirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
267 Cal. App. 2d 895 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1968
(Dethlefsen v. State Board of Equalization, 145 Cal.App.2d 561 [ 303 P.2d 7 ].) … (Farah v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 159 Cal.App.2d 335, 338 [ 324 P.2d 98 ]; Jacques, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 155 Cal.App.2d 448, 462-463 [ 318 P.2d 6 ]; People v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna