Case law

Sepatis v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

110 Cal. App. 3d 93 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1980

Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32, 45 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ] [overruled on other grounds, In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 851 ( 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 )].) … (Koss v. Dept.

Hall v. Board of State Harbor Commissioners

21 Cal. App. 2d 680 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1937

Prior to December 19, 1934, petitioner had held a noncivil service position as secretary-stenographer with the Board of State Harbor Commissioners for a period of more than six months. … Under the facts the case is governed by Lowy v. Reardon, 12 Cal.

Service Employees International Union, Local 99 v. Options—A Child Care & Human Services Agency

200 Cal. App. 4th 869 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 2011

Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) in meetings of its board of directors to the extent that the *873 meetings involved publicly funded programs. … Brown Open Meetings Act (‘Brown Act’), Government Code Sections 54950-54961.” 1 Options’s board of directors met on June 18, 2008.

Satco, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

144 Cal. App. 3d 12 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1983

(See Standard Oil Co. v. Johnson (1944) 24 Cal.2d 40 [ 147 P.2d 577 ], hereafter Standard Oil II; 6 Garrett Corp. v. State Board of Equal. (1961) 189 Cal.App.2d 504, 511 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 421 ]; cf. Standard Oil I, supra.) … (See, e.g., Western Contracting Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1968) 265 Cal.App.2d 568, 575 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 472 ].) We first note the airbills list Flying Tiger as the shipper, not Satco.

Adventist Health v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

211 Cal. App. 4th 376 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 2012

Fund v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 230, 240 [ 79 Cal.Rptr.3d 171 , 186 P.3d 535 ].) … (Slade v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1999) 64 Cal.Comp.Cases 597.) We do, however, consider questions of law de novo. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp.

Valenzuela v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

40 Cal. App. 3d 557 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1974

(Ludolph v. Board of Police Commrs., 30 Cal.App.2d 211, 216 [ 86 P.2d 118 ].) … Plaintiff cites numerous cases requiring notice and hearing: Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education (5th Cir. 1961) 294 F.2d 150 , R. R. v. Board of Education of Shore Reg. H. S.

Times Mirror Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

102 Cal. App. 3d 872 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1980

It is bound by the facts stipulated to, (Palmer v. … The Board of Equalization opinions all adopted reasoning similar to that in Southern Pacific Co. v. McColgan.

San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced

216 Cal. App. 4th 1167 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2013

(Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1972) 7 Cal.3d 652, 659, fn. 8; Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. Wade, supra, at p. 129.) … (See, e.g., Moreno v.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

201 Cal. App. 2d 567 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1962

On appeal by the club, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board reversed the decision of the department on the ground that it had erroneously interpreted the applicable law. … (Corey v. Knight, 150 Cal.App.2d 671, 680 [ 310 P.2d 673 ].) When a statute specifies an exception, no others may be added under the guise of judicial construction.

Frazer v. Dixon Unified School District

18 Cal. App. 4th 781 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1993

(Joiner v. … (Set D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1,22 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)

Southwest Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

234 Cal. App. 3d 1421 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1991

Mario Saikhon, Inc. v. … (Mario Saikhon, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd., supra, 140 Cal.App.3d at p. 582 ; United Farm Workers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 347, 350 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 437 ].)

Buhlert Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

199 Cal. App. 3d 1530 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1988

Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 67 AC 488 [(1967) 67 Cal.2d 483 ]; DeLuna v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 258 ACA 271 [(1968) 258 Cal.App.2d 199 ]; Miller v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 258 ACA 589 [(1968) 258 Cal.App.2d 490 ]; and Fruehauf Corporation v.

Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1992

(i).) *1466 Prior to the enactment of the Act, the Board had the authority to determine which amenities were included in the base rent for a unit. In Sterling v. … Corp. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 1548, 1556 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 636 ]; Jongepier v.

Yellen v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

174 Cal. App. 3d 1040 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1985

(Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 31 Cal.3d 124, 135 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 732 , 642 P.2d 792 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 69, 74, fn. 7 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ].) … (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 195-198 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ].)

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

223 Cal. App. 2d 563 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1963

State Board of Equalization (1958) 166 Cal.App.2d 109, 114-115 [ 333 P.2d 125 ], taken from Goldsmith v. … v.

Yoffie v. Marin Hospital District

193 Cal. App. 3d 743 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1987

Appellants sought an order commanding the MGH board and the other defendants to comply with the open meeting requirements of the Brown Act. … (People v. Craft (1986) 41 Cal.3d 554, 560 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 626 , 715 P.2d 515 ]; Sullivan v. Fox (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 673, 678 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 5 ]; Leeth v. Workers' Comp.

St. Cyr v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

196 Cal. App. 3d 468 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1987

Cyr seeks review of an order of the workers’ compensation Appeals Board (Board) which affirmed a decision of the workers’ compensation judge. … In denying reconsideration, the Board adopted the report of the judge.

Diebold, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

168 Cal. App. 2d 628 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1959

Code, §1647; Code Civ Proc., § I860; Walsh v. Walsh, 18 Cal.2d 439, 444 [ 116 P.2d 62 ] ; Restatement, Contracts, § 235 (d).) … For the reasons given, the judgment appealed from is affirmed except as to the three transactions wherein the parties expressly stipulated that title to the goods should pass when they were placed on board a common carrier

Kroger Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

210 Cal. App. 4th 952 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 2012

Sedgwick Attorney Brown was the only witness called. … The WCAB in Godinez v.

Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

161 Cal. App. 3d 1036 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1984

(Paine v. State Bd. of Equalization (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 438, 442 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 47 ]; Honeywell, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 739, 744 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 479 ].) … (See Hervey v. AMF Beaird, Inc., supra, 464 S.W.2d 557, 563, fn. 3 .)