Case law

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

245 Cal. App. 2d 919 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1966

Department cites also Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 197 Cal.App.2d 172 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 315 ]; Mercurio v. … Brown, P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred. 1 "143. Female Employees of On-Sale licensees Soliciting or Accepting Alcoholic Drinks.

O'Mara v. California State Board of Pharmacy

246 Cal. App. 2d 8 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1966

It was squarely *11 decided in Frost v. State Personnel Board, 190 Cal.App.2d 1, 5-6 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 718 ], and Kramer v. … (Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 62 Cal.2d 589, 594 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 400 P.2d 745 ].)

Helene Curtis, Inc. v. Assessment Appeals Board

90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 31 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1999

(Lavin v. … (Masonite Corp. v.

Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board

62 Cal. App. 4th 1409 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1998

The Second Board Appeal (Yee IV) On the second appeal from the Board’s rate-setting decision (Yee v. City of Escondido, supra, D022341 [nonpub. opn.] … Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board—Due Process 1.

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

33 Cal. App. 3d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1973

, Inc. v. … The Board’s conclusion is in direct conflict with the holdings in Cooper v. State Board of Equalization (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 676 [ 290 P.2d 914 ]; Hobson v.

People's Lobby, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

30 Cal. App. 3d 869 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1973

Stringham (1925) 195 Cal. 672 [ 235 P. 448 ]; Riedman v. Brison (1933) 217 Cal. 383 [ 18 P.2d 947 ]; Wallace v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 2 Cal.2d 109 [ 39 P.2d 423 ]; Mervynne v. … (Galvin v. Board of Supervisors (1925) 195 Cal. 686 [ 235 P. 450 ]; *873 Newsom v. Board of Supervisors (1928) 205 Cal. 262 [ 270 P. 676 ].) Hurst v.

A.F. Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Electric Supply, Inc.

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 2006

and one of Brown’s employees. … As recognized in Sunlight Electric Supply Company v.

Farah v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

159 Cal. App. 2d 335 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1958

(Ritz v. Lightston, 10 Cal.App. 685, 689 [ 103 P. 363 ] ; People v. Baker, 38 Cal.App. 28, 34 [ 175 P. 88 ] ; Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App.2d 178, 187 [ 273 P.2d 572 ].) … (Dethlefsen v. State Board of Equalization, 145 Cal.App.2d 561, 567 [ 303 P.2d 7 ] ; Young v. State Board of Equalization, 90 Cal.App.2d 256 [ 202 P.2d 587 ].)

Aengst v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

110 Cal. App. 3d 275 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1980

In People v. … We held in that case, as did our Supreme Court in People v.

Tanimura & Antle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 127 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2007

Similar views have been expressed recently in Vera v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 154 Cal.App.4th at pages 1003-1004; Chang v. Workers’ Comp. … (Vera v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 154 Cal.App.4th at p. 1009 .)

Pating v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

130 Cal. App. 3d 608 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1982

(Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini, supra, 93 Cal.App.3d 669 .) … (See, e.g., Camacho v. Youde (1979) 95 *624 Cal.App.3d 161, 164 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 26 ]; Brown v. State Department of Health (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 548, 556 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 344 ].)

Hammond Lumber Co. v. Board of Supervisors

85 Cal. App. 2d 568 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1948

Dist. v. McClellan, 55 Cal.App. 244 [ 203 P. 147 ].) … Dist. v. McClellan, supra.)

Lucent Technologies v. State Board of Equaliz.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2015

Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 20, 24 [“Sales tax statutes do not impose a tax on services . . .”]; Preston v. … For support, the Board cites Pierce v. Underwood (1987) 487 U.S. 552, 569 (Pierce).

Reece v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

64 Cal. App. 3d 675 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1976

Inc. v. … Inn, Inc. v.

McCrae v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

30 Cal. App. 3d 89 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1973

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate. … In King v. Unemployment Ins.

Johnson v. State Water Resources Control Board

20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 2004

Quality Control Bd. v. Barry (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 158 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 349 ] (Barry), *1110 on which the trial court relied, was wrongly decided or is inapplicable here. … PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Because the challenged ruling arises in the context of a demurrer, we accept as true the material factual allegations of the first amended petition for writ of mandate and complaint for damages (Olszewski v.

Rondon v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 295 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2007

The Agencies Both the Department and the Board are “constitutional agencies upon which limited judicial powers have been conferred.” (Walker v. Munro (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 67, 73 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 737 ]; see also Martin v. … (Cf., e.g., Nasha v.

Yazdi v. Dental Board of Cal.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2020

[Citations.]’ ” (Williamson v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1343, 1347, quoting Lake v. … (Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 667.)

Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

238 Cal. App. 4th 710 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 2015

a question of law is presented, we undertake a de novo review of the Board’s ruling (Pollak v. … (Wiles v. State Personnel Board (1942) 19 Cal.2d 344, 347 (Wiles); see § 19172.)

IBM Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

77 Cal. App. 3d 279 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1978

We apply a liberal interpretation of the rule as mandated by Wiseman v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1956) 46 Cal.2d 570 [ 297 P.2d 649 ]. … In Wiseman v. Industrial Acc.