Case law

Standard Register Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

259 Cal. App. 2d 125 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1968

(Superior Oil Co v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 406 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 545 , 386 P.2d 33 ] ; see also Honolulu Oil Corp. v. … Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 417, 425 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 552 , 386 P.2d 40 ]; Household Finance Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, at p. 929.)” In Edison California Stores v.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

238 Cal. App. 2d 24 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1965

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 238, at p. 248 [ 340 P.2d 1 ].) … Code, § 23084; see also Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, supra, p. 243.)

Kammerer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

259 Cal. App. 2d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1968

In McCoy v. Industrial Acc. … Applicant also contends that the appeals board acted arbitrarily in changing the findings of the referee without a transcript of the testimony. In Allied Comp. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Symmar, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

135 Cal. App. 3d 65 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1982

We affirm the order of the Board. The applicant was employed as the chairman of the board and chief executive officer by Symmar, Inc./Clarott II (the employer). On September 8, 1977, Mr. … Both the applicant and Fremont Indemnity Company sought reconsideration of the Board’s opinion and decision after reconsideration, but reconsideration was denied by the Board.

Torrance Education Assn. v. Board of Education

21 Cal. App. 3d 589 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1971

The history and purposes of the Winton Act are reviewed in Berkeley Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 660 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 515 ] and California Federation of Teachers v. … (See Anderson v. Stansbury (1952) 38 Cal.2d 707, 717 [ 242 P.2d 305 ]; Haley v. L. A. County Flood Control Dist. (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 285, 292 [ 342 P.2d 476 ].) The judgment is affirmed.

Chrysler Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

89 Cal. App. 3d 1034 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1979

(D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 18-19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ]; Davey v. Southern Pacific Co. (1897) 116 Cal. 325, 329 [ 48 P. 117 ].) … v.

Honeywell, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

128 Cal. App. 3d 739 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1982

(People v. Schwartz (1947) 31 Cal.2d 59, 64 [ 187 P.2d 12 ]; Maganini v. Quinn (1950) 99 Cal.App.2d 1, 8 [ 221 P.2d 241 ].) … He cannot assert error and thus shift to the state the burden to justify the tax. .. . ” (Hall v. Franchise Tax Board (1966) 244 Cal.App.2d 843, 848 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 597 ].)

Zenith Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 2007

We also observe that the Board has, since its decision in the present case, reached the same conclusion as the court in Costco. In Pendergrass v. … v.

Winters v. State Board of Equalization

93 Cal. App. 2d 87 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1949

(People v. Skinner, 18 Cal.2d 349, 357 [ 115 P.2d 488 , 149 A.L.R. 299 ]; Mudd v. McColgan, 30 Cal.2d 463 [ 183 P.2d 10 ].) … (People v. Skinner, supra.)

Kelley v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

223 Cal. App. 4th 1067 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 2014

BS 135139) v. CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, INC., Real Party in Interest and Appellant. … (See Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board (1980) 26 Cal.3d 770, 775-776.)

Delorey v. Board of Public Works

114 Cal. App. 20 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1931

The judgment herein was on appeal (Delorey v. Board of Public Works, 110 Cal. … In Petersen v. Civil Service Board, 68 Cal.

Parker v. Board of Dental Examiners

108 Cal. App. 156 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1930

Many authorities following the same rule are cited, including Wood v. Board of Fire Commrs., 50 Cal.

Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Dean

118 Cal. App. 2d 628 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1953

(See annotation to Miller v. Buhl, [ 48 Idaho 668 ( 284 P. 843 )] 72 A.L.R 687.) Our courts have subscribed to this rule. (Mesmer v. Board of Public Service Comm’rs, 23 Cal.App. 578 [ 138 P. 935 ]; Shelton v. … The reasoning in Garrett v.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

245 Cal. App. 2d 919 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1966

Department cites also Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 197 Cal.App.2d 172 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 315 ]; Mercurio v. … Brown, P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred. 1 "143. Female Employees of On-Sale licensees Soliciting or Accepting Alcoholic Drinks.

Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

130 Cal. App. 3d 506 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1982

(See also, Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra.) C. … (Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 49 Cal.App.3d at p. 950 ; 3 Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 81 Cal.App.3d 564, 579 ; Skelly v.

Souliotes v. California Victim Compensation Board

California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2021

(Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126.) In Dhillon v. … Citing Times Mirror Co. v.

Allen v. Sutter County Board of Equalization

139 Cal. App. 3d 887 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1983

In September 1979, real party in interest, one of the grandchildren, applied to the Sutter County Board of Equalization (Board) to have the assessment reduced to its original figure. … (Gonsalves v. Hodgson (1951) 38 Cal.2d 91, 98 [ 237 P.2d 656 ]; Rest.2d Trusts, § 2, com. f, p. 9.)

People's Lobby, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

30 Cal. App. 3d 869 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1973

Stringham (1925) 195 Cal. 672 [ 235 P. 448 ]; Riedman v. Brison (1933) 217 Cal. 383 [ 18 P.2d 947 ]; Wallace v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 2 Cal.2d 109 [ 39 P.2d 423 ]; Mervynne v. … (Galvin v. Board of Supervisors (1925) 195 Cal. 686 [ 235 P. 450 ]; *873 Newsom v. Board of Supervisors (1928) 205 Cal. 262 [ 270 P. 676 ].) Hurst v.

Eureka Teacher's Assn. v. Board of Education

202 Cal. App. 3d 469 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1988

Similarly, the court in Snipes v. … (Dilts v. Cantua Elementary School Dist. (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 27, 32 [ 234 Cal.Rptr. 612 ]; Loehr v. Ventura County Community College Dist. (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 1071, 1080 [ 195 Cal.Rptr. 576 ]; Hanson v.

O'Mara v. California State Board of Pharmacy

246 Cal. App. 2d 8 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1966

It was squarely *11 decided in Frost v. State Personnel Board, 190 Cal.App.2d 1, 5-6 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 718 ], and Kramer v. … (Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 62 Cal.2d 589, 594 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 400 P.2d 745 ].)