Case law

City of Fillmore v. Board of Equalization

194 Cal. App. 4th 716 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2011

(Sierra Club v. … Coachella Valley involved an unfair labor practice charge made to California’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) under the MeyersMilias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 3500 et seq.).

Eureka Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education

199 Cal. App. 3d 353 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1988

Government v. … In Jean v.

Equilon Enterprises LLC v. Board of Equilization

189 Cal. App. 4th 865 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2010

The trial court entered judgment against Shell and in favor of defendants Board of Equalization (the board) and State Department of Health Services (now the State Department of Public Health) (the department), concluding … Scientists v.

Randle v. California State Board of Pharmacy

240 Cal. App. 2d 254 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1966

(Cooper v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 678 [ 290 P.2d 914 ].) Mrs. … In Cooper v.

Hochstetler v. Board of Pilot Commissioners

6 Cal. App. 4th 1659 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1992

(See Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia (1851) 53 U.S. [12 How.] 299, 314-315 [ 13 L.Ed. 996, 1002-1003 ].) … (Ibid., citing Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia, supra, 53 U.S. at pp. 320-321 [13 L.Ed. at pp. 1005-1006], italics added.)

Williams v. Inglewood Board of Realtors, Inc.

219 Cal. App. 2d 479 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1963

Cason v. … (See, also, Brown v. Lehman, 141 Pa. Super. 467 [ 15 A.2d 513, 156-517 ].)” The award of damages for plaintiff’s expulsion from defendant Board of Realtors worked a miscarriage of justice.

Fullerton v. State Water Resources Control Board

90 Cal. App. 3d 590 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1979

In Irwin v. … Dist. v. Dept. of P. Wks., 1 Cal.2d 476, 477-478, [ 35 P.2d 1027 ]. However, the inclusion of such a condition would be discretionary with the Board.

Brannen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

46 Cal. App. 4th 377 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1996

The board cited Huston v. Workers’ Comp. … Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Cooper v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

118 Cal. App. 3d 166 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1981

Appellants appealed to respondent California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which affirmed the administrative law judges and adopted their statement of reasons. … J., and Barry-Deal, J., concurred. 1 Respondent relies upon Barrett v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Bd. (1961) 190 Cal.

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & Laflin

89 Cal. App. 3d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1979

Associates, Inc. (2d Cir. 1962) 306 F.2d 534 , 538; N.L.R.B. v. Roblen (7th Cir. 1967) 385 F.2d 52, 58 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Local 248, Meat & Allied Food Wkrs., supra, 534 F.2d at p. 744, and cases there cited; Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., supra, 515 F.2d at pp. 1192-1193; Brown v.

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

123 Cal. App. 719 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1932

(Attkisson v. Reynolds, 94 Cal. App. 185 [ 270 Pac. 686 ] ; Griffin v. Kent, 206 Cal. 263 [ 274 Pac. 56 ]; Ritter v. Ritter, 208 Cal. 27 [ 280 Pac. 112 ]; Sterling Corp. v. … Superior Court, 207 Cal. 370 [ 278 Pac. 859 ]; Smith v. Wall, 97 Cal. App. 674 [ 275 Pac. 983 ] ; Shultz v. O'Rourke, 118 Cal. App. 207 [ 4 Pac. (2d) 797 ]; Davilla v. Liberty Life Ins. Co., 114 Cal.

McGinty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board.

266 Cal. App. 2d 280 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1968

Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com., 89 Cal.App. 197 [ 264 P. 514 ]; London Guar. & Acc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 190 Cal. 587 [ 213 P. 977 ]; Sun Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. … The board erred in denying compensation. The order of the board is annulled. Kerrigan, J., and Tamura, J., concurred.

Associated Students v. Board of Trustees

56 Cal. App. 3d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1976

(See Nestle v. City of Santa Monica, 6 Cal.3d 920, 925 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 568 , 496 P.2d 480 ]; Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. … (See Baglione v. Leue, 160 Cal.App.2d 731, 733-734 [ 325 P.2d 471 ]; Alonso v. Hills, 95 Cal.App.2d 778, 788-789 [ 214 P.2d 50 ]; and see 4 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed. 1971) Trial, § 304, p. 3113.)

State Board of Barber Examiners v. Star

8 Cal. App. 3d 736 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1970

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … (See Paul v. Allied Dairymen, Inc., 209 Cal.App.2d 112, 121 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 595 ].) The Board cites Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v.

Zenith Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 724 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2008

Fund v. Workers’ Comp. … A. v. Indus. Acc.

Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources Board

128 Cal. App. 3d 789 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1982

Rptr. 550 STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AIR RESOURCES BOARD et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 52134. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. … App.3d 940, 947 ) and supportive findings are not required. ( City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation Com., supra, 76 Cal. App.3d at pp. 390-391; Board of Supervisors v. California Highway Commission (1976) 57 Cal.

Pooled Money Investment Board v. Unruh

153 Cal. App. 3d 155 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1984

The Attorney General v. Johnson (1856) 6 Cal. 499, 500-501 , disapproved on other grounds in People ex rel. Deukmejian v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 150, 159 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 624 P.2d 1206 ].) … (Veterans' Welfare Board v. Jordan, supra, 189 Cal. at pp. 130-131, 134.) Stressing the limited application given the appropriation doctrine throughout the United States (at p. 134, citing inter alia, Rowley v.

Honeywell, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

48 Cal. App. 3d 897 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1975

They are also in conflict with the Board’s Regulation 1615 (formerly rule 12—Appendix C p. C-8). VI The case of Gen. Elec. Co. v. … Co. v. State Bd., etc., supra. For the same reasons, it is upheld here.

Martinez v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

63 Cal. App. 3d 500 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1976

(See Hicks v. Sheffield, 23 Cal.App.3d 441 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 274 ]; Perez v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd., 4 Cal.App.3d 62 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 871 ]; Fermin v. Department of Employment, 214 Cal.App.2d 586 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 642 ].) … (Lacy v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 17 Cal.App.3d 1128, 1135 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 556 ]; Young v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 37 Cal.App.3d 606, 610 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 460 ].)

Simpson v. Unemployment Insurance Compensation Appeals Board

187 Cal. App. 3d 342 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1986

Simpson filed an appeal with the Appeals Board. The Appeals Board affirmed the decision of the ALJ, adopting the ALJ’s statement of facts and reasons for decision as its own. … An alternative writ of mandate was later filed, ordering the Appeals Board to show cause why its decision in Simpson’s case should not be set aside. The Appeals Board filed an answer.