Case law

Cox v. State Social Welfare Board

193 Cal. App. 2d 708 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 1961

(Newbold v. Social Welfare Board, supra, 76 Cal.App.2d 844, 847 [ 174 P.2d 482 ].)” … In People v.

Burns v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

190 Cal. App. 3d 759 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1987

(Id., at p. 59.) 2 In Quintana v. … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd.

State v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

101 Cal. App. 3d 673 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1980

In Turner Gas Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. … Recently, in Department of Industrial Relations v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

City of Downey v. Board of Administration

47 Cal. App. 3d 621 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1975

(Board of Supervisors v. Dolan (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 237, 243 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 347 ] and cases cited therein.) … (Wallace v. City of Fresno, 42 Cal.2d 180, 185 [ 265 P.2d 884 ]; See Packer v. Board of Retirement, 35 Cal.2d 212, 214, 218-219 [ 217 P.2d 660 ].)

Terlau v. Board of Police Commissioners

126 Cal. App. 2d 116 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1954

Teed v. State Board of Equalization

12 Cal. App. 2d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1936

The petition alleged that on the 16th day ¡of August, 1935, the petitioner received from the State Board of Equalization the following letter dated July 1, 1935: "This office is in receipt of instructions from Sacramento … The letter does not constitute an order or decision of the board or any other official act of the respondent board, and it makes no direct application to the petitioner. It contains no threat of any kind.

Young v. State Board of Control

93 Cal. App. 3d 637 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1979

(See Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Reimel (1968) 69 Cal.2d 172, 175 [ 70 Cal.Rptr. 407 , 444 P.2d 79 ]; Mahdavi v. … Our Supreme Court in Los Angeles v.

Alexander v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

104 Cal. App. 3d 97 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1980

Appellant California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board appeals from a judgment granting a writ of mandate compelling the board to pay unemployment insurance benefits to respondent Marilyn Alexander. … The board challenges the trial court’s finding that respondent was available for work within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1253, subdivision (c).

Borders Online v. State Board of Equalization

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 176 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2005

(Michelson v. … (Scripto v.

Brainard v. State Board of Medical Examiners

68 Cal. App. 2d 591 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1945

Petitioner has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendant board. … (In re Hatch, 10 Cal.2d 147 [ 73 P.2d 885 ]; In re Rothrock, 16 Cal.2d 449 [ 106 P.2d 907 , 131 A.L.R. 226 ] ; State v. Mason, 29 Ore. 18 [ 43 P. 651 , 54 Am.St. Rep. 772] ; State Board of Medical Examiners v.

Benson v. Marin County Assessment Appeals Board

219 Cal. App. 4th 1445 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2013

Ct. v. No. CV 1003775) MARIN COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD, Defendant; JAMES D. … Brown, Jr., September 20, 1979, pp. 1–2.)

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

261 Cal. App. 2d 119 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1968

Code; Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 238, 245-246 [ 340 P.2d 1 ]; Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 212 Cal.App.2d 106, 113 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 74 ]; Reimel v. … For the reasons the court in Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 255 Cal.App.2d 40 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 778 ], distinguished Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, 40 Cal.2d 772 [ 256 P.2d 1 ], and Reimel v.

Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

250 Cal. App. 2d 673 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1967

(Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, 40 Cal.2d 772, 775 [ 256 P.2d 1 ].) … (Bowman v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Board, supra, pp. 471-472.)

Kopitske v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

74 Cal. App. 4th 623 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1999

Victoria Kopitske (Kopitske) petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying reconsideration of its ruling that the penalty assessed for unreasonable delay in paying PDA should … (Ritchie v. Workers’ Comp.

Honeywell, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

48 Cal. App. 3d 907 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1975

Board did not create the law of fixtures. The law of fixtures was recognized in California long prior to the enactment of the Sales Tax Act (Merritt v. … We hold that rule II is a proper exercise of Board’s rule-making authority. Gen. Elec. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra; Coast Elevator Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra.

Department of Transportation v. State Personnel Board

178 Cal. App. 4th 568 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 2009

The *576 Board’s interpretation of appellate opinions is minimally persuasive, so we independently review the Board’s decision as well. (Yamaha Corp. of America v. … (Governing Board v. Metcalf (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 546, 551 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 724 ].) The exclusionary rule does not apply to driver’s license suspension proceedings (Park v.

Nunes v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

88 Cal. App. 2d 632 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1948

Decker v. … (See also La Prade v. Department of Water & Tower, 27 Cal.2d 47 [ 162 P.2d 13 ]; Steen v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, 26 Cal.2d 716 [ 160 P.2d 816 ].)

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

8 Cal. App. 3d 1009 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1970

In Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners (1964) 229 Cal.App.2d 124 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 171 ] (hearing in Sup. … Insofar as Swegle v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 125 Cal.App.2d 432 , 437 and 439, Benedetti v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control, supra, 187 Cal.App.2d 213, 217 , and Sunseri v.

International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1999

Lungren v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 313 [ 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 855 , 926 P.2d 1042 ].) 3. LAXT’s board of directors is a legislative body within the meaning of the Brown Act. … (See Malibu Committee for Incorporation v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 397, 410 [ 271 Cal.Rptr. 505 ], review den.; Mir v.

Miller v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

193 Cal. App. 3d 1371 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1987

(See Kupka v. Board of Administration (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 791, 794-798 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 214 ].) The trial court relied on Service Employees International Union v. Hollywood Park, Inc., supra, 149 Cal.App.3d 745 . … (Aylward v. State Board etc. Examiners (1948) 31 Cal.2d 833, 839 [ 192 P.2d 929 ]; B. W. v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 219, 234 [ 215 Cal.Rptr. 130 ]; City and County of San Francisco v.