Case law

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

3 Cal. App. 3d 209 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1969

(Big Boy Liquors, Ltd. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 71 Cal.2d 1226, 1230 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 258 , 459 P.2d 674 ]; Lacabanne Properties, Inc. v. … (Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners, 229 Cal. App.2d 124, 134-135 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 171 ].)

Thomas v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners

93 Cal. App. 495 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1928

Thereafter the Board of Osteopathic Examiners held a trial. Evidence, both oral and documentary, was introduced and the matter was submitted to the board for its determination. … the implied findings by the trial court that there was such evidence before the Board of Osteopathic Examiners.

Sparks v. Board of Dental Examiners

22 Cal. App. 2d 216 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1937

Fontno v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

273 Cal. App. 2d 684 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1969

Pursuant thereto, we have concluded that the board has failed to meet the requirements of Labor Code section 5908.5. in deciding that issue. Petitioners, citing the ease of Clemmens v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 73 Cal.App.2d 555, 559-560 [ 166 P.2d 908 ] and eases cited therein.)

Davenport v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

24 Cal. App. 4th 1695 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1994

(See Nadler v. California Veterans Board (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 707, 718 [ 199 Cal.Rptr. 546 ].) Other Issues Davenport also raises several procedural issues which lack merit. … (Palm v. Schilling (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 63, 67 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 600 ]; City of Coachella v.

Rilcoff v. State Board of Medical Examiners

90 Cal. App. 2d 603 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1949

to secure a review of the suspension of appellant’s physician’s and surgeon’s certificate by said board. … an unlicensed practitioner in the practice of medicine. ’ ’ The hearing before the board lasted several days.

Board of Trustees v. Superior Court

274 Cal. App. 2d 377 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1969

(See Associated Brewers Distributing Co. v. Superior Court (1967) 65 Cal.2d 583, 586 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 772 , 422 P.2d 332 ]; Elmore v. Superior Court (1967) 255 Cal.App.2d 635, 638 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 307 ].) Laubscher v. … (See Whitfield v. Superior Court (1966) 246 Cal.App.2d 81, 86 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 505 ], hear. den.)

Guaranty Liquidating Corp. v. Board of Supervisors

22 Cal. App. 2d 684 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1937

(Ambassador Hotel, etc., v. Los Angeles County, 94 Cal. App. 143, 146 [ 270 Pac. 726 ].) … (McCreery v. Fuller, 63 Cal. 30, 31 ; Moore v. Schneider, 196 Cal. 380, 389 [ 238 Pac. 81 ].)

De Luna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

258 Cal. App. 2d 199 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1968

In Beveridge v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Huntsman v. Board of State Harbor Commissioners

17 Cal. App. 2d 749 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1936

Code, sec. 3513; Lukens v. Nye, 156 Cal. 498 [ 105 *753 Pac. 593 , 20 Ann. Cas. 158, 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 244].) … We refer to the litigation entitled Kennedy v.

Ware v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

78 Cal. App. 4th 508 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1999

Borello & Sons, Inc. v. … I dissent for the reasons stated by the workers’ compensation judge and the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Burns v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

190 Cal. App. 3d 759 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1987

(Id., at p. 59.) 2 In Quintana v. … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd.

Terlau v. Board of Police Commissioners

126 Cal. App. 2d 116 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1954

Teed v. State Board of Equalization

12 Cal. App. 2d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1936

The petition alleged that on the 16th day ¡of August, 1935, the petitioner received from the State Board of Equalization the following letter dated July 1, 1935: "This office is in receipt of instructions from Sacramento … The letter does not constitute an order or decision of the board or any other official act of the respondent board, and it makes no direct application to the petitioner. It contains no threat of any kind.

Young v. State Board of Control

93 Cal. App. 3d 637 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1979

(See Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Reimel (1968) 69 Cal.2d 172, 175 [ 70 Cal.Rptr. 407 , 444 P.2d 79 ]; Mahdavi v. … Our Supreme Court in Los Angeles v.

Alexander v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

104 Cal. App. 3d 97 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1980

Appellant California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board appeals from a judgment granting a writ of mandate compelling the board to pay unemployment insurance benefits to respondent Marilyn Alexander. … The board challenges the trial court’s finding that respondent was available for work within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1253, subdivision (c).

Faulder v. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors

51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 251 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2006

(Stephens, at p. 913; see also Curle v. … If the current challenger receives a majority of the votes, she will be elected; if not, then the Board of Supervisors will select a candidate for the position to serve the term provided by law.”

Borders Online v. State Board of Equalization

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 176 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2005

(Michelson v. … (Scripto v.

Nortel Networks Inc. v. Board of Equalization

191 Cal. App. 4th 1259 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 2011

(Mazer v. Stein (1954) 347 U.S. 201, 217 [ 98 L.Ed. 630 , 74 S.Ct. 460 ]; see also Kewanee Oil Co. v. … (Micro-Sparc, Inc. v. *1275 Amtype Corp.

Brainard v. State Board of Medical Examiners

68 Cal. App. 2d 591 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1945

Petitioner has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendant board. … (In re Hatch, 10 Cal.2d 147 [ 73 P.2d 885 ]; In re Rothrock, 16 Cal.2d 449 [ 106 P.2d 907 , 131 A.L.R. 226 ] ; State v. Mason, 29 Ore. 18 [ 43 P. 651 , 54 Am.St. Rep. 772] ; State Board of Medical Examiners v.