Case law

Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1999

Discussion The interpretation of a labor statute is a legal question which we review independently from the determination of the appeals board. (See *516 Rymer v. … For this proposition, State Fund offers only an opinion of the appeals board—Sharma v. CNA Cas. of Calif. (1993) OAK 195740, 22 Cal. Workers’ Comp. Rptr. 18.

City of Palmdale v. Board of Equalization

206 Cal. App. 4th 329 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 2012

On February 19, 2010, eight cities and one redevelopment agency filed a third petition against the Board (City of Alhambra v. State Board of Equalization (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2011, No. … (See Hardisty v. Hinton & Alfert, supra, 124 Cal.App.4th at p. 1007 .)

Maples v. Kern County Assessment Appeals Board

117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 663 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 2002

The Board, as a board of equalization, is a constitutional agency exercising quasi-judicial powers delegated to it by the California Constitution. (Shell Western E & P, Inc. v. … (Coca-Cola Co. v.

Eureka Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education

199 Cal. App. 3d 353 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1988

Government v. … In Jean v.

Equilon Enterprises LLC v. Board of Equilization

189 Cal. App. 4th 865 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2010

The trial court entered judgment against Shell and in favor of defendants Board of Equalization (the board) and State Department of Health Services (now the State Department of Public Health) (the department), concluding … Scientists v.

Leslie v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

234 Cal. App. 3d 117 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1991

(Collins v. Board of Medical Examiners (1972) 29 Cal.App.3d 439, 444 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 634 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 69 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 [ 435 P.2d 553 ].) … Since we find no abuse of discretion in imposing the discipline (Collins v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 29 Cal.App.3d at p. 446 ; Fick v.

Bookout v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

62 Cal. App. 3d 214 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1976

Appeals Board”). … (Mercier v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra; State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hutchinson), supra.)

Randle v. California State Board of Pharmacy

240 Cal. App. 2d 254 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1966

(Cooper v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 678 [ 290 P.2d 914 ].) Mrs. … In Cooper v.

Transactron, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

68 Cal. App. 3d 233 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1977

The board relied on Madin v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1956) 46 Cal.2d 90 [ 292 P.2d 892 ], and California Comp. & Fire Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. … The test of substantiality of evidence must be measured on the basis of the entire record, rather than by simply isolating evidence supportive of the board’s determination. (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Toohey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

32 Cal. App. 3d 98 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1973

Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 67 Cal.2d 925, 928 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 323 , 434 P.2d 619 ]) or the “personal convenience or comfort” (Nichols v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (See Western Greyhound Lines v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Brooks), 225 Cal.App.2d 517 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 580 ]; Workmen’s Compensation: The Personal Comfort Doctrine (1960) Wis. L.Rev. 91.)

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

168 Cal. App. 3d 1160 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1985

(Kulchar v. Kulchar (1969) 1 Cal.3d 467, 470-471 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 489 , 462 P.2d 17 , 39 A.L.R.3d 1368 ]; Jorgensen v. Jorgensen (1948) 32 Cal.2d 13, 17-19 [ 193 P.2d 728 ]; Pico v. … However the circumstances are manifestly insufficient to warrant setting aside the earlier orders after the Board had lost jurisdiction to rescind, alter or amend. (§ 5804; cf. Kulchar v.

Brannen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

46 Cal. App. 4th 377 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1996

The board cited Huston v. Workers’ Comp. … Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 116 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2006

V, § 13.) … (Regents of University of California v.

Kyles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

195 Cal. App. 3d 614 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1987

Thorp, Inc. v. Worker's Comp. … (Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 159, 166 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 157 , 666 P.2d 14 ]; Cedillo v. Workmen’s Comp.

Osbun v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

93 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1979

Petitioner thereafter filed an application for benefits with the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter the Board) against Hintz, Hintz’s insurer Zenith National Insurance Company, the subcontractor, Tom Veteran … Our review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board is limited in scope. We review factual findings only to determine whether they are supported by substantial evidence. (Lab. Code, § 5952; LeVesque v.

Gonzalez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

186 Cal. App. 3d 514 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1986

Relying on Ezzy v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 252 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 90 ], the Board ruled that Applicant’s participation was not a reasonable expectancy and set aside the prior award. … Goodman v.

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & Laflin

89 Cal. App. 3d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1979

Associates, Inc. (2d Cir. 1962) 306 F.2d 534 , 538; N.L.R.B. v. Roblen (7th Cir. 1967) 385 F.2d 52, 58 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Local 248, Meat & Allied Food Wkrs., supra, 534 F.2d at p. 744, and cases there cited; Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., supra, 515 F.2d at pp. 1192-1193; Brown v.

Oliver v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

143 Cal. App. 3d 215 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1983

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her petition for a writ of mandate to overturn an adverse decision of respondent board. We reverse. … I In Social Security Board v.

Federal Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

221 Cal. App. 4th 1116 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2013

ADJ7224961) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, ADRIENNE JOHNSON, Respondents. … This amendment does not apply retroactively. 11 Johnson has only cited opinions of the Board. (See, e.g., Houston Comets v. W.C.A.B. (Kenlaw, Jessee) (2013) 78 Cal.Comp.Cases 1153.)

Associated Students v. Board of Trustees

56 Cal. App. 3d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1976

(See Nestle v. City of Santa Monica, 6 Cal.3d 920, 925 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 568 , 496 P.2d 480 ]; Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. … (See Baglione v. Leue, 160 Cal.App.2d 731, 733-734 [ 325 P.2d 471 ]; Alonso v. Hills, 95 Cal.App.2d 778, 788-789 [ 214 P.2d 50 ]; and see 4 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed. 1971) Trial, § 304, p. 3113.)