Case law

Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

211 Cal. App. 3d 717 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1989

Ordering the worker to attend a medical examination 185 miles from his residence is unreasonable and should not be sanctioned by the Board under its own practice. (See Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. … Code, § 3202; LeBoeuf v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 234 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 547 , 666 P.2d 989 ]; Webb v. Workers’ Comp.

Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

256 Cal. App. 2d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1967

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Brown v. Cranston, 214 Cal.App.2d 660, 672 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 725 ].) … (County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie, 19 Cal.2d 634, 639 [ 122 P.2d 526 ] ; In re Kernan, 242 Cal.App.2d 488, 491 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 515 ] ; Brown v.

Desert Turf Club v. Board of Supervisors

141 Cal. App. 2d 446 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1956

(Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401, 413 [ 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R.2d 90 ].) The opinion in Cunningham v. … Com., 170 Cal. 800, 801 [ 151 P. 423 ] ; Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners, 93 Cal.App. 65 [ 268 P. 1073 ] ; Thrasher v.

Arias v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

146 Cal. App. 3d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1983

And while the Board’s determination of what constitutes good cause is entitled to great weight, it is not conclusive. (Id., at p. 956; Aliano v. Workers' Comp. … Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

Brodsky v. California State Board of Pharmacy

173 Cal. App. 2d 680 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1959

Pharmacy v. … Control, 153 Cal.App.2d 740, 751 [ 315 P.2d 484 ]; Munro v. Alcoholic etc. Appeals Board, 154 Cal.App.2d 326, 330 [ 316 P.2d 401 ] ; Karides v. Department Alcoholic Bev.

Chaidez v. Board of Administration etc.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2014

Chaidez and the City suggest this case is comparable to the circumstances in Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567. … (City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 544.)

Hunt v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

87 Cal. App. 2d 98 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1948

Then mandate will issue to compel the board to perform the act which the statute requires. … The appellant board, in 1944, by rule increased the required number of academic hours to 4,000.

King v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

25 Cal. App. 3d 199 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1972

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Deering, op. cit. supra, § 15.25, pp. 280-281.) … A similar contention was made in Sherbert v.

O'Connell v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

149 Cal. App. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1983

(Perales v. … The third stage may be before the Board which independently weighs the evidence as shown in the ALJ’s hearing record together with new evidence which may be admitted; the Board includes a statement of facts in its written

Clementine v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

47 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1941

(Board of Education v. Common Council, 1 Cal. App. 311, 312 [ 82 Pac. 89 ]; Green v. Jordan, 216 Cal. 318, 319 [ 14 Pac. (2d) 297 ] ; Jones v. Clark, 355 Ill. 527 [ 189 N. E. 870, 872 ] ; State ex rel. Shelton v. … Cook v.

Wholesalers Board of Adjusters v. Norton

13 Cal. App. 2d 663 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1936

(Leonard v. Home Builders, 174 Cal. 65 [ 161 Pac. 1151 , L. R. A. 1917C, 322]; Browning v. McNear, 145 Cal. 272 [ 78 Pac. 722 ]; Tracy Brick etc. Co. v. Wurster, 44 Cal. App. 652 [ 187 Pac. 125 ].) … (Nevada Land & Investment Corp. v. Sistrunk, 220 Cal. 174 [ 30 Pac. (2d) 389 ]; First Nat. Bank v. Stansbury, 118 Cal. App. 80 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 13 ].)

Bobbitt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

143 Cal. App. 3d 845 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1983

Consequently, the board’s order denying jurisdiction must be annulled. … to the board for further proceedings.

Trevino v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

207 Cal. App. 3d 1012 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1989

The WCJ noted the Board’s decision in Gray v. Moss Lighting (1978) 43 Cal.Comp.Cases 586 (in bank). … The Board unanimously adopted the reasons stated in the WCJ’s report and denied reconsideration. The appellate court in Rodgers v. Workers’ Comp.

Fisk v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 4th 1078 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1993

In Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Recently, in Rouseyrol v. Workers’ Comp.

Perry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

28 Cal. App. 3d 828 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1972

(See Austin v. City of Santa Monica (1965) 234 Cal.App.2d 841, 844-845 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 857 ]; City of Palo Alto v. Industrial Acc. Com. [Gaudin] (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 305, 307 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 822 ]; and note Amborn v. … The award is vacated and the proceedings under review are remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board to revise its award by deleting the credit of $630. Molinari, P. J., and Elkington, J., concurred.

Crawford v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

185 Cal. App. 3d 1265 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1986

Petitioner’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was denied by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board). At the direction of the Supreme Court, we issued a writ of review. … Code, §§ 2780, 2787, 2788; People v. Wozniak (1965) 234 Cal.App.2d 162 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 215 ]; People v. Owens (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 403 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 91 ].)

Szabo v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners

129 Cal. App. 3d 958 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1982

A helpful discussion of the distinction is found in Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. … Savelli v.

Jacques, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

155 Cal. App. 2d 448 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1957

(Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125,131-132 [ 173 P.2d 545 ] ; Moore v. State Board of Equalization, 76 Cal.App.2d 758, 762-763 [ 174 P.2d 323 ]. See also Boren v. … (Moore v. State Board of Equalization (1946), 76 Cal.App.2d 758 [ 174 P.2d 323 ], and Hansen v. State Board of Equalization (1941), 43 Cal.App.2d 176 [ 110 P.2d 453 ].)

Van Voorhis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

37 Cal. App. 3d 81 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1974

I The board indicated that applicant’s hearing loss was an occupational disease. (See Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Since applicant was not regularly employed at that time the board relied upon principles found in Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Jenkins v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

137 Cal. App. 410 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1934

(Gilbert v. Civil Service Commission, 61 Cal. App. 459 [ 215 Pac. 97 ] ; Fitzsimmons v. O’Neill, 214 Ill. 494 [ 73 N. E. 979 ]; Griffin v. Williams, 168 App. Div. 63 [ 153 N. Y. Supp. 926 ]; Gardner v. … E. 937 ]; People v. Mayor of City of Brooklyn, 149 N. Y. 215 [ 43 N. E. 554 ]; People v. Waring, 7 App. Div. 204 [ 40 N. Y. Supp. 275 ] ; Kenny v. Kane, 27 Misc. 680 [ 59 N. Y. Supp. 555 ]; Vansuch v.