Case law

Selden v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

176 Cal. App. 3d 877 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1986

In its accompanying opinion the Board majority concluded that applicant’s reliance on Bland v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Royster v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 412, 414 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 210 ].) Bland v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Krohn v. Board of Water & Power Commissioners

95 Cal. App. 289 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1928

(People v. Thompson, 94 N. Y. 451 ; People v. La Grange, 2 App. Div. 444 [ 37 N. Y. Supp. 991 ]; People v. Cruger, 17 App. Div. 483 [ 45 N. Y. Supp. 519 ]; People ex rel. Lawson v. Coler, 40 App. Div. 65 [ 57 N. Y. … The case of Price v.

Brock & Co. v. Board of Supervisors

32 Cal. App. 2d 550 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1939

(Brock & Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal. (2d) 286 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 791 , 110 A. L. … The judgment denying such petition was affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court in Brock & Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal. (2d) 286 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 791 , 110 A. L. R. 700], herein referred to as the Brock case.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

212 Cal. App. 2d 106 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1963

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, supra, pp. 246-247.) … (Swegle v. State Board of Equalization (1954) 125 Cal.App.2d 432, 437-438 [ 270 P.2d 518 ] ; Cooper v. State Board of Public Health (1951) 102 Cal.App.2d 926, 932 [ 229 P.2d 27 ]; Moyer v.

L.A.J., Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

38 Cal. App. 3d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1974

‘If reasonable minds may well be divided as to the wisdom of an administrative board’s action, its action is conclusive.’ (Rible v. Hughes, supra, at p. 445 .) … (Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 272 Cal.App.2d 728, 734 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 373 ]; Automatic Canteen Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 238 Cal.App.2d 372, 381 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 848 ].)

Kaczorowski v. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors

106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 14 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2001

Bk. v. Superior Court (1942) 19 Cal.2d 409, 415 [ 121 P.2d 729 ]; Lushing v. … If the court had entered a judgment against the Board, that judgment would not bind the Commission and would be vulnerable to collateral attack by the Commission. (Silver v.

Mesmer v. Board of Public Service Commissioners

23 Cal. App. 578 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1913

Gunn and People v. … A. 755, 28 Pac. 272, 675 ]; Robertson v. Board of Library Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 , [ 69 Pac. 88 ].)

Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

211 Cal. App. 3d 717 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1989

Ordering the worker to attend a medical examination 185 miles from his residence is unreasonable and should not be sanctioned by the Board under its own practice. (See Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. … Code, § 3202; LeBoeuf v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 234 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 547 , 666 P.2d 989 ]; Webb v. Workers’ Comp.

Bogart v. Board of Medical Examiners

99 Cal. App. 2d 170 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1950

Petitioner further claims that the board’s finding of *171 guilt “is not supported by any evidence whatsoever . . . and is contrary to law.” … might make to said patients to the effect that she had lost her license would destroy the confidence of her patients in her and would result in her loss of livelihood.” *172 As stated in West Coast Home Improvement Co. v.

Hulbert v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

47 Cal. App. 3d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1975

This statute applies equally to “the courts” and to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (see Beaida v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Exchange v. Ind. Acc.

Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

256 Cal. App. 2d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1967

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Brown v. Cranston, 214 Cal.App.2d 660, 672 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 725 ].) … (County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie, 19 Cal.2d 634, 639 [ 122 P.2d 526 ] ; In re Kernan, 242 Cal.App.2d 488, 491 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 515 ] ; Brown v.

Arias v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

146 Cal. App. 3d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1983

And while the Board’s determination of what constitutes good cause is entitled to great weight, it is not conclusive. (Id., at p. 956; Aliano v. Workers' Comp. … Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

Brodsky v. California State Board of Pharmacy

173 Cal. App. 2d 680 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1959

Pharmacy v. … Control, 153 Cal.App.2d 740, 751 [ 315 P.2d 484 ]; Munro v. Alcoholic etc. Appeals Board, 154 Cal.App.2d 326, 330 [ 316 P.2d 401 ] ; Karides v. Department Alcoholic Bev.

Chaidez v. Board of Administration etc.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2014

Chaidez and the City suggest this case is comparable to the circumstances in Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567. … (City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 544.)

Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

110 Cal. App. 3d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1980

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners (1946) 75 Cal.App.2d 161, 161-162 [ 170 P.2d 510 ]; Hohreiter v. … (Petrucci v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 83, 88 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 735 ]; Webster v.

Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors

222 Cal. App. 3d 1337 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1990

Perley v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 424, 434 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 53 ].) The courts should not substitute our own credibility determinations for those of the public agency. … (City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 229, 240 [ 227 Cal.Rptr. 899 ]; Schaeffer Land Trust v.

O'Connell v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

149 Cal. App. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1983

(Perales v. … The third stage may be before the Board which independently weighs the evidence as shown in the ALJ’s hearing record together with new evidence which may be admitted; the Board includes a statement of facts in its written

Clementine v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

47 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1941

(Board of Education v. Common Council, 1 Cal. App. 311, 312 [ 82 Pac. 89 ]; Green v. Jordan, 216 Cal. 318, 319 [ 14 Pac. (2d) 297 ] ; Jones v. Clark, 355 Ill. 527 [ 189 N. E. 870, 872 ] ; State ex rel. Shelton v. … Cook v.

Wholesalers Board of Adjusters v. Norton

13 Cal. App. 2d 663 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1936

(Leonard v. Home Builders, 174 Cal. 65 [ 161 Pac. 1151 , L. R. A. 1917C, 322]; Browning v. McNear, 145 Cal. 272 [ 78 Pac. 722 ]; Tracy Brick etc. Co. v. Wurster, 44 Cal. App. 652 [ 187 Pac. 125 ].) … (Nevada Land & Investment Corp. v. Sistrunk, 220 Cal. 174 [ 30 Pac. (2d) 389 ]; First Nat. Bank v. Stansbury, 118 Cal. App. 80 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 13 ].)

Pope v. State Board of Equalization

202 Cal. App. 3d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1988

(Stats. 1933, ch. 1020, §§ 1-35, pp. 2599-2612; Engs Motor Truck Co. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d at p. 1471, fn. 5 ; also see Satco, Inc. v. … (See, e.g., Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 1036, 1039 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 74 ].)